Lorenzo Accomasso notes.

Levi Dalton

Levi Dalton
"I am the Last of the Mohicans" was a famous quote of Bartolo Mascarello's. But it would seem that in fact it would apply more aptly to Renzo Accomasso, a grower in La Morra whose first vintage was 1958 and who still works his vine rows today. Over the course of a few visits to Accomasso, I have compiled these notes. I was able to sample some more diverse vintages of Accomasso wines at two recent dinners held in New York by Chambers Street Wines, and will post my notes on those wines later.

Lorenzo Accomasso Quotes:

“I have never changed anything.”

“Luckily, there is someone still different than everyone else.”

He has avoided groups in his life, and has avoided taking on the philosophy of a group: “Do what you want, without looking around at the others.”

“You have to respect what someone else is doing.”

“I feel everyone has to stay in their own garden, and I stay in mine.”

“Eventually, we cannot complain.”

“I am out of the game. It is up to your generation.”

“I see it as a positive that many young people come to visit me. I see it as a positive that many people who do not have a background in farming, but are from some other field, come to visit me.”

“I think we are going to go to the better, although it seems a big world.”

“We make wine in the vineyard. Without a good exposure, there is no point.”

“When you take away the sulphur, something nasty can come up [in reference to not adding sulphur to wines].”

“If the land is more expensive now, we have to say thank you to the people who use barrique, because these land prices are something new.”

“If you sell your vineyard now, you lose a chance that comes once in a hundred years.”

“I tried to age some Dolcetto in barrique that was 7-8 years old, but I don’t do it anymore because it is boring to work with barrique. However, that wine was still pretty good, so I don’t mind barrique.”

Dolcetto:

“I drink Dolcetto. This is the wine that I drink.”

“The 2006 Dolcetto is still fresh (in 2015), lively, really nice.” The 2006 Dolcetto was hard to ferment: the fermentation wouldn’t start due to the high sugars.

“Dolcetto turns to the dark. You can get the color.”

Barbera:

“It is hard to find a soil that marries Barbera well. Barbera needs heavy soil, clay. Like in Monforte: Barbera needs the soil that is good for bricks [there is a brick factory in Monforte].”

“The grapes of Barbera taste good to eat.”

Sales:

Sold wine to Peter Matt in the 1980s for the American market.

Now 80-90% of sales are cellar door to visitors. Otherwise, Japan is his number one export market today.

“In 30 years the production of the region almost has doubled. There isn’t much else to plant. In La Morra I don’t see a spot where I could plant more.”

Vineyards:

His Dolcetto is planted on a steep, stony site near to Bovio in La Morra.

Rocche dell’Annunziata: His parcel faces full south, towards Castiglione Falletto. His parcel was planted in 1960. This has now been pulled out, and it has not been replanted yet.

Rocchette: Faces west. More elegant wines than Rocche. “Within a half hectare, you have four different soil types.” The production of his Rochette is about 4,000 bottles each year.

Planted rootstocks in 1958, overgrafted them in 1959 [I believe this refers to the Rocchette -LD].

The vineyard closest to his house was in the past bottled as “La Mie Vigne,” but now the name for that in terms of the MGA is Annunziata [not Rocche dell’Annunziata, just Annunziata].

In some rows the trelissing goes as high as 3 meters in his vineyards.

He planted some Michet (the low yielding clone 71) as an experiment (the first harvest was 2012), but has not fallen in love with it. “It gives a different wine.” He feels he has to learn how to deal with it.

The new clones are less resistant to mildew- he needs to spray sulphur more often. Doesn’t like clone 142. Clone 141 is a Lampia that is closer to a Michet. Clone 320 is an older clone that he always used a lot. He never tried the Picotendro. The clone 71 is probably the best clone (the Michet one). He is experimenting with clone 185. He had one ton and a half of Rosé clone: was approachable right away as a wine.

He has experienced some issues with Flavescenza Dorata amidst his Dolcetto vines recently, but otherwise it hasn’t been much of a problem for him yet.

He believes in green harvesting, rather than pruning back to begin with. In general, he keeps a lot of fruit on the vines [it seems to me, LD]. He does not hedge the vines. He ties the vine canes into a cappello (“hat”) to protect from hail/sun. He does not use herbicides [in Annunziata, I did not see the other vineyards].

Vintages:

Accomasso’s favorite four vintages: 1971, 1974, 1990, 1997. He also likes 1982, 1989, 1999.

2016: The soil is very dry. He has never seen the soil so dry. There are fissures in the ground.

2015: “I have the inspiration- it may be like 1990.”

2013: “Good, but tricky.”

2009: Not a fan. “Too much alcohol.”

2008: “Not as good as 2007. A wine that people will like, probably.” On 3/11/15 he said the 2008 Barolo was still half in oak, half in steel, and that he planned to bottle it after the 2015 harvest.

2004: Nice wines.

1990 Rocche Barolo: “The poetry of wine. A wine that I really liked, it had everything.”

1989: “Maybe will age longer than 1990.”

1976 and 1977: Not good vintages.

1974: he did not add sulphur. “It was 30 total, but this was in fact a little too low.”

1971: they picked in November.

Technique:.

Uses native yeasts.

A mix of stainless and concrete for the fermentations.

Punch downs manually, in steel and concrete.

At one point he said: 40-60 days of maceration for the Barolo. Racks in July.
At another point he said: 38-45 day maceration, racks when clear. Possibly this was for the Dolcetto.

Malolactic conversion usually happens in June or July. Malo happens in steel.

These days only a little of wine is aged in demijohns. At one time he used 250 glass demijohns, but only some of those are used now. In those cases, the wine goes into demijohn after the time in wood. The 1995 Barolo is still in demijohn as of 7/9/2016.

He has 2 pumps for moving wine.

He told me on my 2015 visit that he destems. During my 2016 visit he refused to answer the question of whether he uses some whole cluster.

He still today bottles a portion of the production by hand. “It takes 2-3 months for the wines to recover after bottling.”

Lately he has been doing more delegation of the cellar and vineyard to duties to hired help. These employees are not Italian.

Miscellaneous notes:

He makes olive oil from the trees near his house.

“Since 2010, the prices for bulk wine from the region have doubled.”

LD Tasting notes:

2010 Dolcetto d’Alba (13.5%):
Smells wonderful: grapey, blossom scent. The nose is great. Savory hints. Balsalmico, red dust. Unfortunately, the palate is a bit short.

2009 Barbera d’Alba “Pochi Filagn”:
Complex nose that I like: includes licorice and also a hint of toothpaste. Broad on the palate. Licorice, wild mint candy. Spearmint. Darker tones, brown tones to the fruit. Lingers on the palate, gets into the senses. Dusty, rustic. River pebbles. Melon.

2007 Rocche Barolo (14.5%):
“I like to drink this now,” says Accomasso.
Tastes volatile, dusty, savory, soulful. Balsalmico, pine needles, sage. Orange peel hinting at oxidation.

2007 Rocche Barolo Riserva:
Dusty nose, with dark bramble. Vegetable minerals and stalky nose (alludes to some stem inclusion for me). Slight cardboard hint on the nose. Dark, oily tones on the soft palate. Dusty red fruit on the finish. As this sits in the glass it gets better, but remains soft. Asked about stems in this 2007, Accomasso says “these are not things we can talk about, I must have my secrets.”

2004 Rocchette Barolo Riserva (14.5%):
Dark fruit, oily. Broad texture. Not as much grip as I might expect (this bottle turns out to have been open for a few days already). Some dusty tones. Orange mandarine. Some grittiness. Good wine.

* 1990 Nebbiolo (from a parcel near Rocche dell’Annunziata, but not labelled here as a Barolo):
This smells delicious. The palate is delicious. An utterly lovely wine, awesome. Bright cherry and rose. Some grittiness. Does have a short finish, though. This tightens some texturally on the palate with time in the glass.

1985 Rocchette Barolo:
Lorenzo is upset about some of the corks failing on this vintage.
Tastes dusty and volatile, but soulful from a bottle that has been open 4-5 days.
 
Thanks very much for these and all the wonderful notes, Levi.
Can Accomasso wines be purchased in the USA these days?
I think Chambers St had them for sale for a very brief moment, but I missed out, unfortunately.
 
originally posted by Marc D:
Thanks very much for these and all the wonderful notes, Levi.
Can Accomasso wines be purchased in the USA these days?
I think Chambers St had them for sale for a very brief moment, but I missed out, unfortunately.

He had a US importer many years ago, but he has long since focused on selling wine at the winery, and to Japan.
 
Thank you for an interesting post. Turns out I have a Barolo Cru Vigne Rocchette Riserva 2004 in the cellar, never tasted, but your post gives some nice background when the time comes.

Maybe Flavio Roddolo also may be one of these last mohicans?
 
originally posted by Odd Rydland:

Maybe Flavio Roddolo also may be one of these last mohicans?

Do you know when Roddolo started making wine? I do not. The oldest wine I have had from him was a 1996.
 
originally posted by Odd Rydland:
He only bottled from 93, but has been a grower all his life.....

Right. A couple of my Italian friends who were wine writers took me to visit him in the early 90s. I remember that the wines were very good and the production was very small - and he had just started to bottle them, but I cannot remember how long he'd been making wine.
 
Um well i started with a corkscrew...

Seriously i was in the company of experienced d barolo drinkers and i am sure we gave
Them tons of time and air but it has been a couple of years and i don't remember the details.
 
originally posted by maureen:
Um well i started with a corkscrew...

Seriously i was in the company of experienced d barolo drinkers and i am sure we gave
Them tons of time and air but it has been a couple of years and i don't remember the details.

I have found that it does tend to matter quite a lot, in regards to perceptions like "spoiled" vs. enjoyable. It isn't so much the air, it is the time without the sediment. Too much air can be unhelpful, actually.

I think, speaking for myself, I would be hesitant to call a producer's wines undrinkable if I wasn't sure of how they had been opened and served.
 
originally posted by Levi Dalton: I have found that it does tend to matter quite a lot, in regards to perceptions like "spoiled" vs. enjoyable. It isn't so much the air, it is the time without the sediment. Too much air can be unhelpful, actually.

Levi, rightly or wrongly, this is why I am loath to cavalierly decanting wines, especially too far ahead of time. I've seen a lot of wines that were decimated, probably due to over-aeration.

. . . . . Pete
 
originally posted by Levi Dalton:
It isn't so much the air, it is the time without the sediment. Too much air can be unhelpful, actually.
Interesting. Is it reasonable to generalize that older nebbiolo-based wines will improve if taken off their sediment without allowing them to sit open in a decanter?
 
originally posted by Jeff Grossman:
originally posted by Levi Dalton:
It isn't so much the air, it is the time without the sediment. Too much air can be unhelpful, actually.
Interesting. Is it reasonable to generalize that older nebbiolo-based wines will improve if taken off their sediment without allowing them to sit open in a decanter?

Double decanting older Nebbiolo is a standard practice for me, as it is for several other people who drink the wines regularly. I have had much better results taking the wine off the sediment, pouring it back into the cleaned bottle, and then stoppering that bottle with a cork than I have had with decanting the bottle and letting it sit in the decanter. In the case of older Accomasso, I would say double decanting 2 or 3 hours ahead and then serving the wine a bit cool can really be of benefit. As actually I have seen it to be in practice.
 
Well double decanting is what I always do when carrying a wine with any age into a restaurant which is where ti tried to drink these two bottles.

And I did not say the producer's wines were undrinkable. I said these two bottles were.
 
“If the land is more expensive now, we have to say thank you to the people who use barrique, because these land prices are something new.”

“If you sell your vineyard now, you lose a chance that comes once in a hundred years.”

The paradox of the family winemakers in Barolo and Burgundy.

Another great post, thanks.
 
originally posted by Levi Dalton:
Double decanting older Nebbiolo is a standard practice for me, as it is for several other people who drink the wines regularly. I have had much better results taking the wine off the sediment, pouring it back into the cleaned bottle, and then stoppering that bottle with a cork than I have had with decanting the bottle and letting it sit in the decanter. In the case of older Accomasso, I would say double decanting 2 or 3 hours ahead and then serving the wine a bit cool can really be of benefit. As actually I have seen it to be in practice.
Thank you, Levi. I'll try this soon. I had been going straight to decanter because older nebbiolo-based wines seem to have two modes: they open up with a half-hour of air (and fade relatively quickly, too) or they won't open up until 6 or 8 hours have passed (by which time the meal is over).
 
originally posted by Jeff Grossman:
originally posted by Levi Dalton:
Double decanting older Nebbiolo is a standard practice for me, as it is for several other people who drink the wines regularly. I have had much better results taking the wine off the sediment, pouring it back into the cleaned bottle, and then stoppering that bottle with a cork than I have had with decanting the bottle and letting it sit in the decanter. In the case of older Accomasso, I would say double decanting 2 or 3 hours ahead and then serving the wine a bit cool can really be of benefit. As actually I have seen it to be in practice.
Thank you, Levi. I'll try this soon. I had been going straight to decanter because older nebbiolo-based wines seem to have two modes: they open up with a half-hour of air (and fade relatively quickly, too) or they won't open up until 6 or 8 hours have passed (by which time the meal is over).

If you think about the amount of time that these older Nebbiolo - I am talking 60s and 70s Barolo - may have been on the lees in wood, it would make sense that there is a certain amount of reduction to contend with. As the winemaking shifts in the late 80s and into the 90s, for me I see it generally as a different situation, and a single decant ahead of service often seems to do well. Where that isn't true and a double decant still seems better (Cappellano Rupestris 10, for instance), the wine was three years in wood with little sulphur addition and long lees contact (you can do longer lees contact with less sulphur). I think it comes down to reduction and lees contact. If the winery is using new barrique (and getting less reduction off new wood) with a short maceration, there doesn't seem to be the same need for taking it off the sediment.

Of course this is all hypothetical and I am trying to learn as I go.

One point of reference is Emidio Pepe. As you may know, Pepe decants their red wines into new bottles before they ship. They also do not press, filter, or fine the red wine before that point. My feeling is that there are still some lees in that sediment that Pepe is decanting off. Essentially, it is a long lees contact in bottle. And the reason that I think this is that I was at a 50 year retrospective tasting of Pepe where none of the wines had been decanted into new bottles. They had been pulled from the cellar, single decanted, and served. This is because this is what the moderator of the tasting wanted to do, although it isn't how the wines are offered by the winery or sold. So anyway, I know the Pepe wines fairly well- I have had a lot of those older vintages many times (keep in mind, there is a limited set, they didn't release every year of the 60s and 70s, for instance). And my perception was distinctly that the younger wines in the lineup (from the 2000s) really benefited from what the moderator of the tasting had done (those wines tasted fresher and more vibrant than usual), and the older vintages suffered for it. This was especially true as the older vintages were served first in the tasting lineup. Those wines tasted more "wounded" than they usually do. I think something similar is at work with older Barolo. If you single decant and serve, it isn't ideal.
 
I doubled decanted a 76 Cavallotto yesterday. alas, the wine was corked but interestingly (to me anyway) the wine tasted great. i kept hoping the corkiness would blow off but after several hours it just wouldn't.
i usually find an umami like profile in old nebbiolo, and this Cavallotto showed that and also, a touch of soy sauce, faded dried cherry, and some acidity. an enjoyable wine but marred by a musty, corky nose. half the bottle remains so, once the fog clears ill see how it held up overnight.

Happy New Year!
 
Back
Top