Yannick

originally posted by Pavel Tchichikov:
originally posted by mark e:
originally posted by Jay Miller:
Jannik
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

Nah, we can't criticize Pete's choices in wine and then bring ourselves down to the same set of preferences in sports/entertainment.
Click to expand...
Um, wait just a #!**m minute! You probably thought you would get away with this not-so-subtle piece of sophistry, didn't you?

Well, I've got news for ya, buster. It ain't gonna cut it. Pete's wine choices aside (and, sure, there's more spoof in them thar tasting notes than you can shake a stick at). But nobody is doing any "bringing down" round here. Yeah, this shit is going to hang over his head for a while, and unfairly so. Let it go, my Tchichikovian friend.
 
originally posted by Keith Levenberg:
I'm very confused.
Click to expand...
Hmm . . . I should probably let Pavel explain/defend his post. How closely do you follow tennis? It would make no sense if you are not an aficionado.
 
originally posted by mark e:
originally posted by Keith Levenberg:
I'm very confused.
Click to expand...
Hmm . . . I should probably let Pavel explain/defend his post. How closely do you follow tennis? It would make no sense if you are not an aficionado.
Click to expand...

Rahsaan may be far more qualified to comment on the degree on spoof we were subjected to in Sunday's showdown.
 
originally posted by Pavel Tchichikov:
Rahsaan may be far more qualified to comment on the degree on spoof we were subjected to in Sunday's showdown.
Click to expand...

I like the extension of the concept to sport, but will leave it to you expound on the details!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top