Skin-Contact Whites and Ageing

Levi Dalton

Levi Dalton
There was some discussion on this board a bit ago about the ageability of Radikon whites. I expressed my opinion that I thought there was improvement with age, given the reference of some of the recent library releases. Others disagreed (cue Monkey).

I have begun to wonder a lot about the ageing curves of skin-contact whites, given my experience of late with Kante, Coenobium, Casa Coste Piane Tranquillo, Ageno, Carlaz, and others.

I have found that in general, there does seem to be a tendency for skin-contact/oxidative notes to come much more to the foreground in a relatively short span of time.

Might anyone have thoughts about this subject?

Might anyone care to help put together a somewhat comprehensive jeebus focusing on this?
 
Does anyone know how white Musar is made? Considering how atypically tannic it is for a white wine, I assumed it does see skin contact, but I don't know for sure. But from the '69 and '75 a few years back, it seems to have no problems aging. But I also would assume that skin contact isn't the only thing required for aging.
 
I'd be interested, for sure. I bet I know someone named Mike Lawton, and quite possibly someone named Joe Perry, who might be as well.

Do we have access to aged versions?
 
originally posted by Otto Nieminen:
I also would assume that skin contact isn't the only thing required for aging.

I would also assume that skin contact is one variable among many many others that relate to aging potential.
 
I'd be interested. What do you consider aged? I have some 1999. We tried some recently, and, I have to say, I didn't see any positive evolution. But I would love to have some more context.
 
It was the 1999 Radikon Ribolla. I remember loving it on release. It was one of the first orange wines I had tried. I brought one to a get together at Don's last spring. I think I was the only one who liked it at all. It was showing a bit more complexity, though not much, the flush of youth was gone, and it was showing quite a bit of something I took to be VA. I should add that a little VA doesn't put me off in general, but whatever this was, I thought it got in the way. Others were put off more than I was.
 
originally posted by Levi Dalton:
Skin-Contact Whites and AgeingThere was some discussion on this board a bit ago about the ageability of Radikon whites. I expressed my opinion that I thought there was improvement with age, given the reference of some of the recent library releases. Others disagreed (cue Monkey).

I have begun to wonder a lot about the ageing curves of skin-contact whites, given my experience of late with Kante, Coenobium, Casa Coste Piane Tranquillo, Ageno, Carlaz, and others.

I have found that in general, there does seem to be a tendency for skin-contact/oxidative notes to come much more to the foreground in a relatively short span of time.

Might anyone have thoughts about this subject?

Might anyone care to help put together a somewhat comprehensive jeebus focusing on this?
On the general question, consider the notable example Vina Tondonia Blanco Gran Reserva, of which I believe the current release is 1987. It rests nine years or so in barrel, then maybe an equal number in bottle prior to release. Then it might continue to develop in bottle for many more years.

It has been consistent practice for a long time at Lopez de Heredia to keep this wine on the skins for seven days during fermentation. Radikon on the other hand, though I haven't visited, seems to me to be inventive and experimental. I've heard some of his wines have been kept on the skins for as long as 35 days. With this approach you might expect greater variability in the results.

If anyone puts together a somewhat comprehensive jeebus focusing on this, might anyone consider inviting me?
 
Great idea.....am curious what a list of potential contenders (and their vintages) would look like. I wonder also -does "cloudy" or not make a difference with aging...and if so, in what way?
 
originally posted by Joel Stewart:
Great idea.....am curious what a list of potential contenders (and their vintages) would look like. I wonder also -does "cloudy" or not make a difference with aging...and if so, in what way?

Here are my general thoughts, open to comment/modification from the group/board.

To speak to the cloudy question, I think that is a separate issue: see for example Villa Dora "Vigna del Vulcano", certainly cloudy, but not, if I understand correctly, macerated on the skins.

In terms of aged (possible?) skin contact whites from elsewhere than Italy, certainly '59 Chateau Musar white was beautiful, haunting, exclamation, exclamation (one of the benchmark wines of my career), and certainly I have had Lopez white back into the '60s showing well. In terms of Italy, I think that it might be worthwhile to deal with amphorae separately, which is another way of saying I think Gravner is a whole together different deal (I don't know anybody else doing an amphorae white, maybe Lispida does?). I think that this is the case because you can actually taste the savory clay imprint in amphorae wines like Pithos, Guttarolo, and Gravner. So I think that is a different situation.

What I am proposing I don't think would be too expensive, because I am actually suggesting that certain not-that-expensive wines have undergone pretty radical changes in terms of taste in the last, uhm, 6 months or so. Which is to say generally that Italy is a hot bed of skin contact whites of late, and that there isn't much of a track record to speak of regarding the category, and that the wines produced in said fashion "can change on you" in a relatively short period of time.

There isn't much of a track record (so far as I know) for, for instance, Carlaz, Harmoge, Giacomelli "Boboli", Casa Costa Piane "Tranquilo", "Coenobium", "Nottediluna" and others. To some degree there is a record of Kante, Radikon, and Ageno.

What I am saying is this: a fair amount of interesting producers are using a technique, and no so many people, myself certainly one of them, understand how that technique will affect the ageability of the bottles produced. In a general sense. I mean, really, Casa Coste Piane Tranquilo has changed so much in such a short period of time that it is almost incomprehensible to me. This is not "White Burgundy", sur lie or otherwise

Jeebus-wise: I will offer donated space and time at a restaurant in Manhattan that I am familiar with, as well current vintages of all the Italian wines I have spoken about above, for those willing to contribute something to the context and breadth of the inquiry stated, as long as they shall agree to a certain date and time that are not too busy inside of a restaurant context.

Seriously. I wonder what is going on. If I buy a wine in a certain quantity, I would like to have some idea of how that wine will taste 6 months hence. But I can state flatly that I am unsure of certain skin-contact wines at this time, as far as their future development. Maybe we can all get a handle on the subject together. At least I put it out there.
 
I'm still interested.

I think the inherent variability of these wines is going to be an issue. Not an insurmountable one, but an issue nonetheless.

Re: Gravner, don't the pre-amphora wines constitute skin-contact examples? Or am I misremembering eras?

Re: track records...even Radikon isn't that old.

Still, the results would be interesting. Pending my presence in this country (never assured), let's do it.
 
I agree, sounds interesting if the schedule fits. I wonder, though, how much history we are going to study - I think anything Gravner pre-2001(?) might not be relevant due to the style change around that time, and older examples of other producers certainly don't exist in my cellar.

But I'd be very interested, and also have a few examples of younger wines.

Another thing I'm curious about is whether the philosophy/elevage obscures the grape/terroir. From what I've tasted so far, I'm inclined to feel that a skin-contact production method is much like botrytis in that it tends to overwhelm many of the characteristics that you might otherwise find. As an example, while I loved the Munjebel white, I'd be very interested to try it with some Vitovska because I think it would be an interesting comparison, despite the geographic, grape type and terroir differences.

OTOH, it's a great way to generate interest in grapes like Sauvignon Blanc and Chardonnay (e.g. Thevenet)
 
I had some late '90s Gravner Ribollas fermented on skin, with extended post-ferment maceration on a couple of occasions, one of which contributed to a hopeless, drunken argument with Thor. The wines in question were mostly fermented in large oak tanks, according to the information from the importer. Unless it's mistaken info, (always a possibility) I'm told that 2001 was the first vintage with an all amphora fermentation regimen. But prolonged skin contact in all cases.
 
oone of which contributed to a hopeless, drunken argument with Thor
Aren't they all?

But actually, it was two arguments. We had a fairly sober argument about that same wine at Zuni a few years earlier.

Maybe we should go for the hat trick...
 
OK, I was wrong. Older Gravner (up to 98?) would be relevant. But I still don't have any. Reading the linked article (thanks Jeff) makes me actually more interested in the wines than I was when I thought they were less interesting.

Note: I could rewrite that last sentence, but it looks nicely redundant, yet i think it retains a thread of sense - so I'll leave it.
 
the one that, to quote Coffee Talk, "gets me right here." I would very much like to be in on such a jeebus, should such occur.
 
Back
Top