Joel Stewart
Joel Stewart
Langlois-Chateau, Cremant de Loire, Brut Rose, 100% Cab. Franc.,12.5 abv. grapes purchased from Montreuil-Bellay. Blushing pink-copper in glass. Fresh nose of allspice, tinge of fresh sliced jalapeno and ripe white fruits. On the palate, the wine floats in layers: a slight fruit burst, then jalapeno (without the heat) crosses the mid, covered in a lace-like foam of honey on top, good acidity on the mid-to-finish and a nice subtle grippy follow through....not cloying. poured into slight curve flutes, the bead is gentle, if less persistent and dulls over time. the nose is very well developed and balanced. there is a lovely mellow spiciness to this wine that airtime is bringing out...and with even more time, fresh raspberries show on the palate...acidity included. those that shun even subtly sweeter bubblies may be less inclined, and though i tend to prefer dry and citric myself, this wine still charms. the varietal is well represented in the style and would make a great apertif, tho i suspect it could hold it's own with a range of flavors and weights.
Langlois-Chateau, Cremant de Loire, Brut, NV, chenin blanc/chard/cab franc in a 60/20/20 blend. 12.5% abv. pale gold in the glass..served at cool cellar temp. developed attractive nose of various dessert spices, white chocolate, white fruit and touches of graham cracker. the palate is both rich and dry, with a brightly acidic lemony attack segueing into leesey nutty notes and moving into a dry slightly anise, sweet ginger/green apple touch on the finish. the lemony zing on the attack is lovely and the herby sweet finish interesting. lemon juice hangs on the lips.
overall, this wine comes off slightly more complex than the brut rose....but i found myself asking is complexity always the best measure? it usually is to me, but then again the 100% cab franc brut rose shows a character with another type of charm all it's own. it's like comparing duke ellington with thelonius monk. on the surface at least, ellington can often sound more complex (and for serious monk fans i realize this reasoning is dubious in some ways) but monk has the charm of his clunky brilliance...(or the brilliance of that clunkiness?) anyway, i listen to them both and so i will buy more of both.
Langlois-Chateau, Cremant de Loire, Brut, NV, chenin blanc/chard/cab franc in a 60/20/20 blend. 12.5% abv. pale gold in the glass..served at cool cellar temp. developed attractive nose of various dessert spices, white chocolate, white fruit and touches of graham cracker. the palate is both rich and dry, with a brightly acidic lemony attack segueing into leesey nutty notes and moving into a dry slightly anise, sweet ginger/green apple touch on the finish. the lemony zing on the attack is lovely and the herby sweet finish interesting. lemon juice hangs on the lips.
overall, this wine comes off slightly more complex than the brut rose....but i found myself asking is complexity always the best measure? it usually is to me, but then again the 100% cab franc brut rose shows a character with another type of charm all it's own. it's like comparing duke ellington with thelonius monk. on the surface at least, ellington can often sound more complex (and for serious monk fans i realize this reasoning is dubious in some ways) but monk has the charm of his clunky brilliance...(or the brilliance of that clunkiness?) anyway, i listen to them both and so i will buy more of both.