originally posted by MLipton:
Whoa! Are you dipping into the personal stash to do this? You might as well call it "VLM-Approved Wines" and have done with it, but some diners are going to be in for a treat. Really attractive pricing, too. I hope people realize what a deal they're getting.
Mark Lipton
originally posted by Rahsaan:
Is something new about that list?
originally posted by VLM:
originally posted by Rahsaan:
Is something new about that list?
Yes, some of the same things, but more focused now on Baudry. I was giving away Rougeard, and no one bought any, so fuck 'em. I pulled it. My friend Michael at Vin Rouge is doing a huge Rougeard list (not up on the web yet, but 6-8 vintages of each wine, I helped a bit with that), so we decided to divide the world between us and I took Baudry.
originally posted by VLM:
Price=Current wholesale*(1 + 10%)^((current vintage + vintage bonus)-vintage)
Price*mark-up
I used standard time value of money to calculate Price.
10% is what you might make in a year at a restaurant if you get lucky.
Vintage bonus is either 0 or 1. It's a way to make starry vintages like 2002 and 2005 a little more expensive, so people will look at others. I may start adding up to 2.
Mark-up is on a decelerating scale with price from 3 for the cheapest to 2.1 for anything over $100. I sort of made this up in increments rather than write a function, but I'm working on a decelerating exponential with just the right shape for this. As of now, it could be a non-monotonic transformation for wines at certain price points.
originally posted by MLipton:
originally posted by VLM:
Price=Current wholesale*(1 + 10%)^((current vintage + vintage bonus)-vintage)
Price*mark-up
I used standard time value of money to calculate Price.
10% is what you might make in a year at a restaurant if you get lucky.
Vintage bonus is either 0 or 1. It's a way to make starry vintages like 2002 and 2005 a little more expensive, so people will look at others. I may start adding up to 2.
Mark-up is on a decelerating scale with price from 3 for the cheapest to 2.1 for anything over $100. I sort of made this up in increments rather than write a function, but I'm working on a decelerating exponential with just the right shape for this. As of now, it could be a non-monotonic transformation for wines at certain price points.
I think that you win the award for the most complex pricing formula in the history of restaurant wine lists. I like how you use a regressive scale for markup, which all too few restaurants employ. A place I dined at in France used a set markup for their wine regardless of price, so your VdT at 5 FF doubles in price with a 5 FF markup, whereas that bottle of '59 Latour also gets a 5 FF markup. It's a good way of encouraging people to try something special and not just limit themselves to the cheapest wines on the list. I also like that you use pricing to encourage people to investigate "off" vintages.
That's a pretty awesome non-reserve list, too.
Mark Lipton
originally posted by VLM:
I had to raise prices so mark e wouldn't drink them all...
originally posted by VLM:
Shameless self promotionI'm kind of proud.
Come try some Southern hospitality, you assholes.
originally posted by VLM:
Thanks, I've got the list right about where I want it, although I wish we sold more Champagne so I could justify expanding that a bit.
originally posted by Jeff Grossman:
So, when do you open a NYC branch with that list?
originally posted by JasonA:
originally posted by Jeff Grossman:
So, when do you open a NYC branch with that list?
Indeed.
Question, the list would bode well here in NYC, how is it received in the South?
And as stated above, the mark-ups on the wine are something we'd like to see more of here in the inhospitable North. They are reasonable but you are not giving the wines away. And then I go ahead and look at the food menu prices - here you seem to be indeed giving the food away. Can you shed some light on the dining scene in the triangle there? Where do these menu prices fit in with your competition?
All this begs the question in my mind, if the food is so cheap are your diners put off by the wine prices even though they are receiving very good value? There is nothing that disappoints me more than seeing good food go to waste by want of a glass (or another as need be) of wine.
originally posted by VLM:
Does this look fair?
![]()
originally posted by VLM:
Does this look fair?
![]()
originally posted by MLipton:
originally posted by VLM:
Does this look fair?
![]()
You know your business far better than I do, but I'd think that a Y asymptote of 1.5 would be more attractive than an asymptote of 2. 50% margin for a $100 wine is still pretty good, no? Likewise, how about an X asymptote of -5 to avoid the catastrophe at low price point? Looking at your graph, it would appear that the 2012 Pepiere would sell for about $50 on your list, which looks overly punitive to me.
Mark Lipton