We’ve had actual soil/plant material tests done twice in almost 20 years. That said, our operation is probably considered pretty low risk.originally posted by Oswaldo Costa:
originally posted by Brian C:
originally posted by VLM:
originally posted by Ian Fitzsimmons:
Eric - Are you offering evidence that organic certified in the U.S. is not 'for real?'
Is this a consensus view on the board? In the in-the-business community?
Yes, the consensus view is that US Organic certification isn't worth the paper it's printed on.
And it’s expensive paper. I pay $2500 to certify my small business annually.
We wrestle with this a lot in our decision to certify and I’m a bit conflicted on this take. While I agree the standards are not particularly strong in the US, having been diluted by years of lobbying by large scale producers, it is a quantifiable standard. It should by no means be considered an indicator of quality, but it does set a baseline of practices if you know what the standards are. Fwiw for vegetable and grain exports we have reciprocity with European standards. Wine exports have several additional criterion they must meet to be accepted by Euro standards.
As with anything agriculture-related, there’s no substitute for having a personal relationship with the producer to know what their practices/philosophy are. I’ll be the last person to defend the supposed ecological sanctity of USDA Organic tag but I know what it means unlike shady undefined terms like “natural” or IPM or regenerative.
In the end it’s probably mostly virtue signaling for marketing purposes rather than anything substantive. I could be a shitty farmer and be certified organic, that’s for sure. It also does not take into account labor practices in any way.
Brian, has it been your experience that inspectors just look at the accounting books instead of testing the actual soil?
It’s mostly record keeping audits.