Dinner in Paris, 1906

MLipton

Mark Lipton
After a particularly brutal few weeks of work, Jean and I took advantage of our recent “empty nester” status and traveled up to Chicago for an evening of food and wine, ostensibly to celebrate our 34th anniversary. On this occasion, we revisited Next, Grant Achatz’s other restaurant during its “Paris 1906” menu season. While I have gone on record here as stating that I have no desire to dine at Alinea, I have no such reservations (pun intended*) about Next. Their 8-course tasting menu homage to Escoffier featured prominent use of black truffles and had several truly spectacular dishes. We also opted for their “Prestige” wine pairing (the second of three tiers of cost), all featuring wines of France, natch. Alas, they weren’t entirely forthcoming with details about the wines served, so I’ve tried to interpolate where I can.

With the hors d’oeuvres, they served a 2010 Drappier Grande Sendrée Brut which was slightly oxidative in character, though not to an extent to bother my oxidatively sensitive spouse, but also delightfully lemony and fresh. Of the hors d’ouvres, the ouef bendictine and salmon mousse barquette were the standouts, the former perhaps even eclipsing the Arpege egg I ate at Manresa an eon ago.

With the phenomenal turtle soup (made with snapping turtle they hastened to inform us), they served the 2016 Fosse-Seche Saumur Blanc ‘Arcane’ which was bone dry and tasting of slightly bruised apples with zippy acidity. Jean, not normally a big fan of Chenin, loved it. I don’t have a whole lot of experience with Saumur Blanc, my one previous exposure having been Clos Rougeard ‘Breze.’ The sommelier was pleasantly surprised that we knew Chenin, especially when we mentioned the Huet in our cellar.

The filets of halibut amounted to a terrine of alternating layers of gelatinated halibut and gelatinated black truffle, which was one of the highlights of the meal. With this, they served a Chassagne-Montrachet, but I caught neither year or producer. It went passably well with the dish, standing up even to the truffle, but still was white Burgundy (meh).

The Financier chicken was another well-crafted dish with both mushrooms and truffle. With this, they served a 2017 Genot-Boulanger Chambolle-Musigny, which was painfully young , smelling of pine needles and oak, but showing some very pretty red fruit. Personally, I felt that an earthier Burgundy would have set off the dish better.

The lamb dish was notable primarily for the lamb rilette at bottom, which was outrageously tasty. They served with this the 2019 Georges Vernay Cote-Rotie which was shockingly light bodied with soft tannins, though the alcohol stick out a bit. I’ve only had the Condrieu from this producer before, though we were informed of a generational change there, with mother and daughter now in charge. We were informed that there was 10% Viognier added for its floral character, but the somm didn’t know whether it was a traditional co-fermentation or not (and looked puzzled by my question).

The Bombe and mignardises at the end made for a fine finish to a great meal. We also chose the Chartreuse off the digestif trolley because why not? We chatted about the scarcity for a bit with the server, who assured us that they get all that they need (what a shocker!).

This meal did live up to expectations, as we hoped it would, though again I felt that the wine pairings could have been better thought out. (FTR, the next tier up started with Krug — we were informed that they were all “highly rated wines,” a complete turnoff for us)

4AD06EF0-64B0-4EC0-A326-982B44461ACE.jpg
* in case you’re not familiar, Next operates on a “ticket “ model: you purchase tickets for a date and time that are all-inclusive of food, wine, tax and tip. They’re non-refundable and you pay up front. I noted to a Jean that I didn’t need to bring a wallet, really.

Your intrepid reporter,
Mark Lipton
 
originally posted by MLipton:
They served with this the 2019 Georges Vernay Cote-Rotie which was shockingly light bodied with soft tannins, though the alcohol stick out a bit. I’ve only had the Condrieu from this producer before, though we were informed of a generational change there, with mother and daughter now in charge. We were informed that there was 10% Viognier added for its floral character, but the somm didn’t know whether it was a traditional co-fermentation or not (and looked puzzled by my question).
I am not entirely sure how a wine about 14% abv can be shockingly light (particularly since you note it seemed a tad hot). Light in color and low in tannins, sure. Also very odd that the sommelier was flummoxed by your question. Not a good sign that they have "pointy wines" on the more expensive pairing; I would have hoped that option might have featured wines with more bottle age instead.
 
originally posted by mark e:
originally posted by MLipton:
They served with this the 2019 Georges Vernay Cote-Rotie which was shockingly light bodied with soft tannins, though the alcohol stick out a bit. I’ve only had the Condrieu from this producer before, though we were informed of a generational change there, with mother and daughter now in charge. We were informed that there was 10% Viognier added for its floral character, but the somm didn’t know whether it was a traditional co-fermentation or not (and looked puzzled by my question).
I am not entirely sure how a wine about 14% abv can be shockingly light (particularly since you note it seemed a tad hot). Light in color and low in tannins, sure. Also very odd that the sommelier was flummoxed by your question. Not a good sign that they have "pointy wines" on the more expensive pairing; I would have hoped that option might have featured wines with more bottle age instead.

As best as I can put it, there was a lack of dry extract vis-a-vis what I expect from that appellation. I don’t expect my Cote-Rotie to be Hermitage-lite or a La-La, but I do expect structure and a mid-palate presence that I didn’t find. It almost had the mouthfeel of a CM wine. Very strange.

Mark Lipton
 
originally posted by mark e:
originally posted by MLipton:
They served with this the 2019 Georges Vernay Cote-Rotie which was shockingly light bodied with soft tannins, though the alcohol stick out a bit. I’ve only had the Condrieu from this producer before, though we were informed of a generational change there, with mother and daughter now in charge. We were informed that there was 10% Viognier added for its floral character, but the somm didn’t know whether it was a traditional co-fermentation or not (and looked puzzled by my question).
I am not entirely sure how a wine about 14% abv can be shockingly light (particularly since you note it seemed a tad hot). Light in color and low in tannins, sure. Also very odd that the sommelier was flummoxed by your question. Not a good sign that they have "pointy wines" on the more expensive pairing; I would have hoped that option might have featured wines with more bottle age instead.

On a side note, on both of my visits I’ve been underwhelmed by their wine service. Because of their business model, buying wine by the bottle isn’t an option AFAICT. So, I would expect very thoughtful choices for the wine pairings, and fairly detailed discussions for those who are interested (as we so evidently were). I can only conclude that wine isn’t really a focus of theirs. Tant pis.

Mark Lipton
 
originally posted by MLipton:

The filets of halibut amounted to a terrine of alternating layers of gelatinated halibut and gelatinated black truffle, which was one of the highlights of the meal. With this, they served a Chassagne-Montrachet, but I caught neither year or producer. It went passably well with the dish, standing up even to the truffle, but still was white Burgundy (meh).

The Financier chicken was another well-crafted dish with both mushrooms and truffle. With this, they served a 2017 Genot-Boulanger Chambolle-Musigny, which was painfully young , smelling of pine needles and oak, but showing some very pretty red fruit. Personally, I felt that an earthier Burgundy would have set off the dish better.

were the two paragraphs written by the same person, or is this one of those team reviews a la Spectator? :-)
 
originally posted by Pavel Tchichikov:
originally posted by MLipton:

The filets of halibut amounted to a terrine of alternating layers of gelatinated halibut and gelatinated black truffle, which was one of the highlights of the meal. With this, they served a Chassagne-Montrachet, but I caught neither year or producer. It went passably well with the dish, standing up even to the truffle, but still was white Burgundy (meh).

The Financier chicken was another well-crafted dish with both mushrooms and truffle. With this, they served a 2017 Genot-Boulanger Chambolle-Musigny, which was painfully young , smelling of pine needles and oak, but showing some very pretty red fruit. Personally, I felt that an earthier Burgundy would have set off the dish better.

were the two paragraphs written by the same person, or is this one of those team reviews a la Spectator? :-)

Huh? You lost me there, tovarisch.

Mark Lipton
 
originally posted by MLipton:
originally posted by Pavel Tchichikov:
originally posted by MLipton:

The filets of halibut amounted to a terrine of alternating layers of gelatinated halibut and gelatinated black truffle, which was one of the highlights of the meal. With this, they served a Chassagne-Montrachet, but I caught neither year or producer. It went passably well with the dish, standing up even to the truffle, but still was white Burgundy (meh).

The Financier chicken was another well-crafted dish with both mushrooms and truffle. With this, they served a 2017 Genot-Boulanger Chambolle-Musigny, which was painfully young , smelling of pine needles and oak, but showing some very pretty red fruit. Personally, I felt that an earthier Burgundy would have set off the dish better.

were the two paragraphs written by the same person, or is this one of those team reviews a la Spectator? :-)

Huh? You lost me there, tovarisch.

Mark Lipton

but I got your attention, huh?

a properly aged white burgundy ( say a 1988-1993 chassagne from one of the good guys ) would be as fantastic with layered halibut/truffle as a young white burgundy would be, at best, useless. A subject nicely covered by the other reviewer in the second paragraph :-)
 
originally posted by Pavel Tchichikov:
originally posted by MLipton:
originally posted by Pavel Tchichikov:
originally posted by MLipton:

The filets of halibut amounted to a terrine of alternating layers of gelatinated halibut and gelatinated black truffle, which was one of the highlights of the meal. With this, they served a Chassagne-Montrachet, but I caught neither year or producer. It went passably well with the dish, standing up even to the truffle, but still was white Burgundy (meh).

The Financier chicken was another well-crafted dish with both mushrooms and truffle. With this, they served a 2017 Genot-Boulanger Chambolle-Musigny, which was painfully young , smelling of pine needles and oak, but showing some very pretty red fruit. Personally, I felt that an earthier Burgundy would have set off the dish better.

were the two paragraphs written by the same person, or is this one of those team reviews a la Spectator? :-)

Huh? You lost me there, tovarisch.

Mark Lipton

but I got your attention, huh?

a properly aged white burgundy ( say a 1988-1993 chassagne from one of the good guys ) would be as fantastic with layered halibut/truffle as a young white burgundy would be, at best, useless. A subject nicely covered by the other reviewer in the second paragraph :-)

But the first paragraph stated neither year nor producer. And didn't speak highly of the wine, so what is the contradiction you note?
 
originally posted by Tom Blach:
As I understand it Escoffier was in London in 1906, not in Paris.

There's a decent book about that time -- Ritz and Escoffier: The Hotelier, the Chef, and the Rise of the Leisure Class by Luke Barr.
 
Back
Top