Joe Dressner
Joe Dressner
I'm all for you being able to buy from any state you want to buy from. Furthermore, so should your 18-year-old child.
So, what's the big deal? Why don't you get involved with a more politically important cause that might actually help people.
What's your agenda here? You come onto a niche wine board talking about how people can't buy Clos Roche Blanche in Illinois. In reality, it is available in that state because we have a distributor there who buys it for the same price our distributor in New York buys the wines.
As a licensed importer and a licensed distributor I am for an end to all restrictive federal and state legislation involving wine sales, even if it financially hurts me.
But let me assure no millions of dollars are being made on these wines. Money is being made on brand wines, but who really cares?
Again, I'd like to know your agenda here. Consumers don't happen to know Maverick salespeople.
You write:
Millions are being made on *every* *single* *bottle* of alcohol that must pass through their monopoly. Every critter labled bottle. Every bottle of Ghost horse. All of them, without exception. If there are not millions being made, how can IL distributors afford to have given $3.5 million in political contributions in just the last five years?
What argument can you make that supports the funding and lobbying that the distributors have mustered to support this law that does not end up with legislating their profit margin?
Let me assure you that the critter bottles would be nowhere if it wasn't for the legislated three-tier-system.
3.5 million dollars is bubkes, as my cousin, Dr. Barbara Hirsch the famous Great Endocrinologist would put it.
Again, what do you do for a living?
So, what's the big deal? Why don't you get involved with a more politically important cause that might actually help people.
What's your agenda here? You come onto a niche wine board talking about how people can't buy Clos Roche Blanche in Illinois. In reality, it is available in that state because we have a distributor there who buys it for the same price our distributor in New York buys the wines.
As a licensed importer and a licensed distributor I am for an end to all restrictive federal and state legislation involving wine sales, even if it financially hurts me.
But let me assure no millions of dollars are being made on these wines. Money is being made on brand wines, but who really cares?
Again, I'd like to know your agenda here. Consumers don't happen to know Maverick salespeople.
You write:
Millions are being made on *every* *single* *bottle* of alcohol that must pass through their monopoly. Every critter labled bottle. Every bottle of Ghost horse. All of them, without exception. If there are not millions being made, how can IL distributors afford to have given $3.5 million in political contributions in just the last five years?
What argument can you make that supports the funding and lobbying that the distributors have mustered to support this law that does not end up with legislating their profit margin?
Let me assure you that the critter bottles would be nowhere if it wasn't for the legislated three-tier-system.
3.5 million dollars is bubkes, as my cousin, Dr. Barbara Hirsch the famous Great Endocrinologist would put it.
Again, what do you do for a living?