Assorted Italian TNs (July 2025-January 2026)

Yule Kim

Yule Kim
2018 Paolo Sordo Barbaresco: A little too tooty-fruity on the nose for me, although it is lifted. The palate is a little thin with bright, light red fruit, a hint of citrus good, and a tart acidity. Tannins already feel resolved with just a slight drying sensation on the finish.

2021 Poderi Colla Barbaresco Roncaglie: There's dark red cherry on the nose interwoven with a subtle hint of smoky tar. Classic Nebbiolo with flavors of red fruit and a subtle hint of smoky minerality. Very elegant with a light weight that hovers over the palate. Drying tannins coat the palate on the finish, but are still accessible. A very well-balanced and enjoyable wine.

2019 Cantina dei Produttori Nebbiolo di Carema Carema Riserva: This has a really fragrant nose of classic rose and red cherry with just a subtle lift to it. There's lots of depth with tart red fruit flavors and a gravelly, smoky minerality. Texturally quite silky with an acidity that is very refreshing and more-ish. Light on the palate, elegant, but intense, with great balance and good tension between the structure and the rich fruit. Just really well made and a great value.

2020 Fratelli Brovia Barolo Rocche di Castiglione: This is very fruity and young on both the nose and the palate. This lacks the earthiness and mineral complexity I normally associate with this cuvee. Acidity is there and provides energy and a cranberry tartness to the rich fruit. Tannins are ripe and soft, but still convey a drying sensation on the finish. The wine is certainly approachable now, but it feels a little too heavy, lush, and velvety for me. A Barolo for hedonists instead of eudaimonists.

2018 Cavallotto Barolo Riserva Bricco Boschis Vigna San Giuseppe: I'm getting more wet earth and forest on the nose here with an undertone of dark red cherry. This is subtle, elegant, but not super intense, but there's enough stuffing here to satisfy. Nice acidity and rather elegant. Tannins are grippy, but approachable, and there's a hint of spice on the finish. Not a blockbuster, but satisfying and showcases the minerality over the fruit.

2020 Bartolo Mascarello Barolo: There are red cherry aromas that are quite fruity and not particularly flora. The palate is very pure and elegant with pretty red fruit, but is, quite frankly, lacking some complexity except for a bit of earthy minerality on the finish. Acidity is decent, and the tannins are already extremely silky; I'm not getting any astringency or drying sensation at all. This is very pretty, very well-made and shaped, with a feathery lightness on the palate, but it comes across as a little soft structurally. Kind of underwhelming considering what this is.

2020 Nervi-Conterno Gattinara Vigna Molsino: An intensely mineral-forward wine with pronounced graphite and earth lying on top of a substrate of cool red fruit and herbs. Very balanced with a refreshing blast of slightly tart acidity. Lean, mean, and linear, but elegant and light on its feet. I imagine some may find this too austere, but, for me, the wine's strictness reminds me of the days of auld lang syne.

2000 Bruno Giacosa Barbaresco Santo Stefano: Quite delicate and ethereal on the palate, but with good depth and a real sweetness to the fruit that does not feel overdone with just a hint of spice to add an interesting grace note to the finish. Aromatically beautiful, with those classic rose and tar aromas that are just a touch lifted. Tannins are quite silky and not too astringent at this point. Acidity is on point and the wine is refreshing.

2000 Bruno Giacosa Barolo Falletto di Serralunga d'Alba: This wine showcased what makes Giacosa so inviting: plenty of finesse and elegance with well-managed tannins that are not too assertive or astringent. However, the red fruit came across as rather simple and uncomplicated and perhaps a touch too ripe. Not a bad wine, but a little boring and lacking the fireworks I normally expect from Giacosa.

2004 Poderi Aldo Conterno Barolo Romirasco: Presented awkwardly with toasty oak from the barrel being the most prominent feature on the palate. The tannins from the wood came across as rather coarse, marring the dark fruit underneath it. Oh well. From magnum.

2005 Fratelli Brovia Barolo Riserva 150 Anniversario: This showed really well, with a classic Nebbiolo nose of roses and tar married with a palate that was pure and elegant, showcasing dark red fruit, savory herbs, firm acidity, and a nice tannic bite on the finish. Definitely still grippy, but that's how I like my Barolo. Yum. From magnum.

1985 Azienda Bricco Asili (Ceretto) Barbaresco Bricco Asili: Fairly brown when decanted, it does have an interesting nose of wet earth and fading red fruit, but this has gone beyond tertiary. All you get is soy sauce at this point; otherwise pretty hollowed out. As an experiment, I kept it until the next day, and the nose got better, and the palate slightly fuller and more interesting, but otherwise pretty dead.

1982 Prunotto Barolo Riserva Bussia di Monforte: This was still lively and vibrant on the palate. Perhaps a touch lactic, but it blew off, revealing slightly dried dark fruit, earthy mushroom notes married with a bit of tar and tobacco. Quite a pleasant surprise how alive this wine was despite clearly being a mature bottle of Barolo.

1971 Francesco Rinaldi e Figli Barolo: Funky and old, but still alive and kicking despite being quite tertiary and savory; like a high-class bottle of shoyu without the salt. For some folks, this was a little too out there, but I liked it and appreciated it for what it was. Nice purity, quite elegant, tannins fully resolved and silky, and good acidity with a savory, umami-laden edge. What more could you want, especially from a Barolo this old?

2021 Nervi-Conterno Gattinara: Slick, polished dark fruit with tannins that already feel very silky and good acidity to maintain nice tension on the palate. Definitely denser and more extracted than what I normally get from the Alto Piemonte. Perhaps a touch too academically-correct? This would get a good grade at the UC Davis enology school.

2019 Giuseppe E Figlio Mascarello Barolo Monprivato: There seemed to be something off and clumsy about this bottle. It wasn't flawed, per se, but it lacked delineation and clarity of flavors. Something really weird was going on. From magnum.

2016 Rovellotti Ghemme Chioso dei Pomi: I was genuinely surprised how well this bottle showed. Elegant on the palate, beautiful red fruit, a slight touch of grip from the tannins, beautifully perfumed on the nose. Wow: this really demonstrated the potential of the Alto Piemonte and the greatness that can come from there.

2013 Vietti Barolo Brunate: This was totally shut down and was not ready for prime time. Very inexpressive. Reserving judgment.

1976 Tenuta San Guido Sassicaia: Unfortunately, this was quite over the hill, but you can still feel that silky texture from the melted tannins. Quite classy and aristocratic, like Annabel Lee in fine repose in a tomb by a sounding sea. And, just as dead as a doornail otherwise.
 
2016 Rovellotti Ghemme Chioso dei Pomi: I was genuinely surprised how well this bottle showed. Elegant on the palate, beautiful red fruit, a slight touch of grip from the tannins, beautifully perfumed on the nose. Wow: this really demonstrated the potential of the Alto Piemonte and the greatness that can come from there.

Agree on your assessment here. The few Rovellotti I have drunk have been excellent. Currently sitting on a mag of 2008 of Chioso Dei Pomi that I am looking for an excuse to open.
 
originally posted by Bill Lundstrom:
2016 Rovellotti Ghemme Chioso dei Pomi: I was genuinely surprised how well this bottle showed. Elegant on the palate, beautiful red fruit, a slight touch of grip from the tannins, beautifully perfumed on the nose. Wow: this really demonstrated the potential of the Alto Piemonte and the greatness that can come from there.

Agree on your assessment here. The few Rovellotti I have drunk have been excellent. Currently sitting on a mag of 2008 of Chioso Dei Pomi that I am looking for an excuse to open.

Yeah, I need to buy more of this producer. Really great value, and excellent wines.
 
originally posted by Yule Kim: Assorted Italian TNs (July 2025-January 2026)
2019 Cantina dei Produttori Nebbiolo di Carema Carema Riserva:Just really well made and a great value.

Yule, well said...and, in my view at least, can be said about most (all?) Produttori wines. They are a favorite go-to producer when I'm considering Italian wines. And often a sleeper value on winelists.

Thanks for the great wine notes.

. . . . Pete
 
originally posted by Peter Creasey:
...in my view at least, can be said about most (all?) Produttori wines. They are a favorite go-to producer when I'm considering Italian wines. And often a sleeper value on winelists.. . . . Pete

Produttori literally means producers.

Presumably you're talking about the coop in Barbaresco? Yule's note is from a completely different coop in Carema. And of course there are many other low-cost coops across the country, but perhaps not all 'sleeper value'.
 
originally posted by Rahsaan:
originally posted by Peter Creasey:
...in my view at least, can be said about most (all?) Produttori wines. They are a favorite go-to producer when I'm considering Italian wines. And often a sleeper value on winelists.. . . . Pete

Produttori literally means producers.

Presumably you're talking about the coop in Barbaresco? Yule's note is from a completely different coop in Carema. And of course there are many other low-cost coops across the country, but perhaps not all 'sleeper value'.

It does seem that Italy has a lot of terrific cooperatives. Produttori del Barbaresco gets most of the attention, but the Produttori di Carema wine was terrific as well. I definitely want to explore more (especially for $30 some-odd dollars).

Another great Italian cooperative is Cantina Terlan. I have had great experiences with their Quarz (Sauvignon Blanc) and Vorberg (Pinot Blanc) cuvees.
 
originally posted by Yule Kim:

2019 Cantina dei Produttori Nebbiolo di Carema Carema Riserva: This has a really fragrant nose of classic rose and red cherry with just a subtle lift to it. There's lots of depth with tart red fruit flavors and a gravelly, smoky minerality. Texturally quite silky with an acidity that is very refreshing and more-ish. Light on the palate, elegant, but intense, with great balance and good tension between the structure and the rich fruit. Just really well made and a great value.

Good hear, Yule. I've got a couple bottles of the '16, but have not yet dared to open one yet as they have generally been described as being quite backwards in their development. It sounds like your '19 was more open.

Mark Lipton
 
originally posted by MLipton:
originally posted by Yule Kim:

2019 Cantina dei Produttori Nebbiolo di Carema Carema Riserva: This has a really fragrant nose of classic rose and red cherry with just a subtle lift to it. There's lots of depth with tart red fruit flavors and a gravelly, smoky minerality. Texturally quite silky with an acidity that is very refreshing and more-ish. Light on the palate, elegant, but intense, with great balance and good tension between the structure and the rich fruit. Just really well made and a great value.

Good hear, Yule. I've got a couple bottles of the '16, but have not yet dared to open one yet as they have generally been described as being quite backwards in their development. It sounds like your '19 was more open.

Mark Lipton

It was a couple of months ago when I had this, but I remember it being pretty accessible. I do have a higher tannin tolerance than most, so ymmv (though I don't remember this being particularly tannic).

But, if you have multiple bottles of the '16, it might be worth taking one for a spin.
 
originally posted by Yule Kim:
2021 Poderi Colla Barbaresco Roncaglie: There's dark red cherry on the nose interwoven with a subtle hint of smoky tar. Classic Nebbiolo with flavors of red fruit and a subtle hint of smoky minerality. Very elegant with a light weight that hovers over the palate. Drying tannins coat the palate on the finish, but are still accessible. A very well-balanced and enjoyable wine.

I'm having some trouble figuring out this producer. I tried both the Barolo and Barbaresco from 2013 and 2016 young and bought them. I've tried both the 2013s in the past year and they've been pretty tough sledding.

originally posted by Yule Kim:
2020 Fratelli Brovia Barolo Rocche di Castiglione: This is very fruity and young on both the nose and the palate. This lacks the earthiness and mineral complexity I normally associate with this cuvee. Acidity is there and provides energy and a cranberry tartness to the rich fruit. Tannins are ripe and soft, but still convey a drying sensation on the finish. The wine is certainly approachable now, but it feels a little too heavy, lush, and velvety for me. A Barolo for hedonists instead of eudaimonists.

I bought but haven't tried any 2020 Brovias yet. Maybe I'll put one in the queue to check it out. I don't mind a richly fruited Barolo from time to time.

originally posted by Yule Kim:
2020 Nervi-Conterno Gattinara Vigna Molsino: An intensely mineral-forward wine with pronounced graphite and earth lying on top of a substrate of cool red fruit and herbs. Very balanced with a refreshing blast of slightly tart acidity. Lean, mean, and linear, but elegant and light on its feet. I imagine some may find this too austere, but, for me, the wine's strictness reminds me of the days of auld lang syne.

2021 Nervi-Conterno Gattinara: Slick, polished dark fruit with tannins that already feel very silky and good acidity to maintain nice tension on the palate. Definitely denser and more extracted than what I normally get from the Alto Piemonte. Perhaps a touch too academically-correct? This would get a good grade at the UC Davis enology school.

I'm pretty confused by these Nervi-Conterno wines as well. I bought some early vintages after the takeover and thought they showed promise, but have been underwhelmed when peeking back in. I've always found that the Conterno Barolos to give a good time even if they are not fully at peak.

originally posted by Yule Kim:
2000 Bruno Giacosa Barolo Falletto di Serralunga d'Alba: This wine showcased what makes Giacosa so inviting: plenty of finesse and elegance with well-managed tannins that are not too assertive or astringent. However, the red fruit came across as rather simple and uncomplicated and perhaps a touch too ripe. Not a bad wine, but a little boring and lacking the fireworks I normally expect from Giacosa.

I had the 2000 and 2001 Rocche di Falletto last summer from my FiLs cellar and both were outstanding. What I love about this era of Giacosa is the silky purity of the fruit. It sounds like the fruit was a bit simple for you, I wonder if you would have found the bottles I had to be the same.

originally posted by Yule Kim:
2005 Fratelli Brovia Barolo Riserva 150 Anniversario: This showed really well, with a classic Nebbiolo nose of roses and tar married with a palate that was pure and elegant, showcasing dark red fruit, savory herbs, firm acidity, and a nice tannic bite on the finish. Definitely still grippy, but that's how I like my Barolo. Yum. From magnum.

We discussed this in my post, but I'm glad you enjoyed this wine. It's great. I'm tempted to hunt down more bottles but I really need to drink what I have.

originally posted by Yule Kim:
1985 Azienda Bricco Asili (Ceretto) Barbaresco Bricco Asili: Fairly brown when decanted, it does have an interesting nose of wet earth and fading red fruit, but this has gone beyond tertiary. All you get is soy sauce at this point; otherwise pretty hollowed out. As an experiment, I kept it until the next day, and the nose got better, and the palate slightly fuller and more interesting, but otherwise pretty dead.

The 1970s and 80s were a great time for Ceretto, especially the 1982s.

originally posted by Yule Kim:
2013 Vietti Barolo Brunate: This was totally shut down and was not ready for prime time. Very inexpressive. Reserving judgment.

I've been out of the Vietti business for a while not really vibing with the style; however, I did grab a few bottles of the 2013 Rocche from auction recently at a good price and was going to open one to try. It sounds like that would be a very bad idea.

As always, thanks for the informative notes.
 
RE: 2000 Giacosa

I think if I had the 2000 Rocche di Falleto, I would have like it a lot. I thought the 2000 Santo Stefano I had was really terrific and complex. The straight Falleto just seemed a significant step down in complexity from the Santo Stefano; it sounds like the Rocche di Falleto has that extra gear that transcended the vintage like the Santo Stefano did. What the straight Falleto and Santo Stefano did share was that pure, luminescent fruit.

RE: 1985 Ceretto

Yeah, I think my issue with the Ceretto had more to do with the specific vintage than the winemaking. I had two bottles of 1985 Barale Rabaja Riserva and they both seemed kind of old and slightly tired, though neither were as advanced as the Ceretto. I also had a friend who said he had some issues with 1985 Giacosas being more advanced, but I have no first hand experience with that, so I can't say for certain.

'82 Prunotto in contrast was great, so maybe a longer-lived vintage? 1982 Musso Sebastiano Rio Sordo Barbaresco I opened with folks in New York was volatile, but the cork fell into the bottle when I tried to insert the Durand, so I'm blaming the volatility on a faulty closure.

RE: Nervi- Conterno

Yeah, they are definitely "good" wines, but perhaps a little soulless? Hard to put my finger on what I find off about them. I remember mentioning the Conterno wines to Cristiano Garella at that Le Pianelle tasting, and he kind of looked amused and said "we are going for a different type of wine" or something to that effect.

RE: Vietti

Yeah, they seem very slick and correct. Kind of the same issue I had with the Nervi-Conterno. "Good" wines that seem a little too academic. I remember Eric Texier wrote a comment about new modernist wines years ago that stuck with me: there's a certain genre of winemaking where they are preserving acidity and structure, but are clearly shaping the wine in a pre-determined direction rather than letting the vineyard and the vintage speak for itself. I kind of feel that's the case with Vietti.
 
Back
Top