Sheik Gabutti

Thor

Thor Iverson
Cappellano 2005 Dolcetto dAlba Gabutti (Piedmont) Something here just reaches down into the soul. Analytically, theres a rough start to deal with some chunky tannin, powerful (but not imbalanced) acidity, a textural chew to the fruit and while the wine never coheres in the way modern oenologists would wish, its all the better for it. Red tones abound. This cries out for food, and some of that missing cohesion appears when the marriage is finalized, but theres a style here that will carry great appeal for certain drinkers (and much less for others; one dining companion absolutely hates the wine until theres food on the table). Me, I think its gorgeous. (2/09)

Alandroal Pontual 2004 Alentejano (Portugal) 65% touriga naional, 35% trincadeira. Straightforward dark berries, walnut skins, some unsweetened chocolate, and what appears to be a thick, enveloping sheathe of oak (expressed more as tannin than aroma, so I could be wrong about this). Theres a lot of density here, but to little end, and I cant see anything source-specific about the wine either. Perhaps age will help. Theres nothing wrong with it, but its no joy to drink either. (2/09)

Bergqvist Vale da Clara by Quinta de la Rosa 2001 Douro (Portugal) Dark cherries and tobacco smoke, showing some resolution (in terms of maturity, not fortitude). Very pretty. This wine is gentling into maturity, yet retains a dark streak that speaks of its origins. (3/09)

Brovia 2006 Langhe Freisa La Villerina Secca (Piedmont) Corked. (2/09)

Fromm La Strada 2002 Pinot Noir (Marlborough) Smoother than the last few iterations, with the cottony tannin still very present, but less oppressive in relation to the fruit than it usually is. The fruit remains dark and brooding, yet with a clear eye of light in its midst that makes it more pinot noir than something heavier, and the finish is pure textural sensuality, albeit of a highly masculine bent. Despite the differences, theres nothing here that makes me question my general suspicion that this is a wine for earlier-term drinking, no matter the structural clues to the contrary. (3/09)

Tulocay 1999 Zinfandel (Amador County) 15%. And: wow. I remember drinking zin like this. Ridge used to make it, and then wed let it age, and much later on it would taste like this. Rolling tumblers of soft red fruit, spice (mostly of the baking genre, though there are various hues of pepper as well), earth, cinnamon cap mushrooms, and that delicious sensation of fruit-weight so crucial to zin, but without the all-too-common burn of Scotch on the finish. Long. Id call this at very early maturity, but with emphasis on the mature aspect. More, please. (3/09)

Verdier-Logel 2006 Ctes du Forez Cuve des Gourmets (Loire) Unmistakably gamay. Red fruit done in metallic shades, hints and dashes of herb, and a lively freshness full of spark and verve. Theres some dusty lead around the edges, as well. Quite linear, and the wine doesnt reward careful study, but its certainly tasty. (3/09)

Boutin Chteau La Roque 2004 Pic Saint Loup Cuve les vieilles vignes de Mourvdre (Languedoc) Totally disjointed for its first ten minutes of life, though this is hardly an unusual trick for a mourvdre to pull. Eventually, it calms down, though its no smooth-talker. Rough-grit sandpaper is the texture, earthy-smoky aromas of an old, wood-beam attic fill the glass, and the palate is thick without being sludgy. If theres fruit, its the sort grown from freshly-laid macadam, though there are suggestions of some deep black residue that might once, in another life, have been the last desiccated offspring of a berry. None of the preceding is particularly unusual for this wine at this stage, though there are some worrisome frays at the edge; coupled with a well-stained cork, I wonder if there might not have been a little more heat than would be ideal in this bottles history. (3/09)
 
...the wine never coheres in the way modern oenologists would wish
Do "modern oenologists" really seek coherence? I'm under the impression it's more like a checklist:
Ripe fruit? Check!
No green notes? Check!
Totally smoothed-out tannins? Check!
No oxidation? Check!
Such wines usually end up as coherent entities, but mainly because so many possible sources of distinction or eccentricity are removed that they are all transformed into perfect little organoleptic spheres.

...a textural chew to the fruit...
I'm always on the lookout for "textural chew" these days. Really. So many wines are so slick and smooth nowadays, it's all you can do to keep them from popping out of your mouth.
 
Your last sentence is actually what I'd say in response to your opening question. (If you can parse that sentence. I'm not sure I can.) The Cappellano was not "smooth," nor "round," nor "silky," nor any of the similar characteristics so prized by some (even me, occasionally), and yet it surpassed any need for those qualities.

(Except for Theresa, who hated it. I was really surprised by her reaction, but then I realized my foolishness. Because: more for me. I haven't been able to have more than a glass of a CFE for years now.)
 
...a textural chew to the fruit...
I'm always on the lookout for "textural chew" these days. Really. So many wines are so slick and smooth nowadays, it's all you can do to keep them from popping out of your mouth.

Speaking of Chew, which wines would you say are Flintstone vitamin chewable?>
Texturally, I'm thinking here of wines like: Montefalco (rossos & sagrantino), certain Italian whites (besides the oxidised kind), Bandol, Irrouleguy's,...
just off hand.
 
originally posted by Thor:

Boutin Chteau La Roque 2004 Pic Saint Loup Cuve les vieilles vignes de Mourvdre (Languedoc) Totally disjointed for its first ten minutes of life, though this is hardly an unusual trick for a mourvdre to pull. Eventually, it calms down, though its no smooth-talker. Rough-grit sandpaper is the texture, earthy-smoky aromas of an old, wood-beam attic fill the glass, and the palate is thick without being sludgy. If theres fruit, its the sort grown from freshly-laid macadam, though there are suggestions of some deep black residue that might once, in another life, have been the last desiccated offspring of a berry. None of the preceding is particularly unusual for this wine at this stage, though there are some worrisome frays at the edge; coupled with a well-stained cork, I wonder if there might not have been a little more heat than would be ideal in this bottles history. (3/09)

Why did you drink this wine so early in its lifetime? Granted, you may have caught a break if it was heat-damaged, but I'm still sitting on '98s, '99s and '01s of this wine. It's possibly my favorite monocepage Mourvedre outside of Bandol.

Mark Lipton
 
originally posted by MarkS:
...a textural chew to the fruit...
I'm always on the lookout for "textural chew" these days. Really. So many wines are so slick and smooth nowadays, it's all you can do to keep them from popping out of your mouth.

Speaking of Chew, which wines would you say are Flintstone vitamin chewable?>
Texturally, I'm thinking here of wines like: Montefalco (rossos & sagrantino), certain Italian whites (besides the oxidised kind), Bandol, Irrouleguy's,...
just off hand.

Hmm, I'd say winemaking technique is nearly as important as grape type or terroir in the case of "chewability". For example, Petite Sirah is an intrinsically chewable kind of grape, but I've had some alarmingly smoothed-out versions lately. I don't think of Zin as naturally chewable, but I'd had some that were. I'd say the list of best bets for chewables would have to include Madiran, Napa/Sonoma/Mendocino mountain Petite Sirah, "old-fashioned" mountain Cabs from Napa, Bandol and some of its California Mourvedre cousins, maybe Lagrein. It's not purely a matter of high tannin - Barolo and Barbaresco can be chewable but I would more likely call them severely drying. Ditto for Burgundies with high tannins. Alicante Bouschet doesn't taste as dry as those, but it does have kind of a chewable character. It's quite possible that none of this makes any sense to anyone but me.
 
originally posted by Thor:
Sheik GabuttiCappellano 2005 Dolcetto dAlba Gabutti (Piedmont) Something here just reaches down into the soul. Analytically, theres a rough start to deal with some chunky tannin, powerful (but not imbalanced) acidity, a textural chew to the fruit and while the wine never coheres in the way modern oenologists would wish, its all the better for it. Red tones abound. This cries out for food, and some of that missing cohesion appears when the marriage is finalized, but theres a style here that will carry great appeal for certain drinkers (and much less for others; one dining companion absolutely hates the wine until theres food on the table). Me, I think its gorgeous. (2/09

Thor,
Had a bottle of this recently, likely from the same source. I found it to be impenetrable (of course that may just be because I'm old). But it seemed that there was a lot of stuff in there that I'd like. My note says" A Dolcetto too tough for lamb!" Anyway, I went out and bought more.

The question for you, sir, is whether time will tame it in a good way or in a bad way. I want it tame but not domesticated.

Charles
 
I hope you left some, but I suspect not.

I can't imagine it won't benefit from time, but I'd prefer to let those with more experience with the wine speak up.
 
In a conversation w/ Baldo in April '04, he mentioned waiting a few years for his Dolcetto (and more than a few for his Barberas). He made a gift of an '01 Dolcetto and a '98 Barbera, both of which I opened with friends on the occasion of his passing. Each were still vibrant.
 
Thanks, Seth.

Scott, yes, they're all enticing and uncheap here, for sure. If that zin had been, say, an '04 I probably wouldn't have bit at that price.

You looked in the box?
Heisenberg's on my Twitter feed.
 
Back
Top