I've been rushing to finish off most of my 2006 Cru Beaujolais. It's a reasonable enough vintage but one or two of the wines I bought have sort of been wearing their welcome on me in recent months.
But tonight we are drinking Coudert's 2006 Fleurie for the second time in the past week. At first there was that thing on the nose and palate that Mr. Dressner once told me meant the soil is iron-deficient or manganese-deficient or something-deficient, but once again after thirty minutes of being open, the wine seems like nearly perfect Fleurie. Ok, there's maybe this mineral/vitamin-deficiency issue that I can't remember and also a slight overripeness on the nose, but otherwise this is very good.
And while I might prefer slightly more red-fruitedness, for 2006 this Fleurie is about as good as it gets in 2006 Cru Beaujolais. Not overly heavy and precise (considering, that is).
But tonight we are drinking Coudert's 2006 Fleurie for the second time in the past week. At first there was that thing on the nose and palate that Mr. Dressner once told me meant the soil is iron-deficient or manganese-deficient or something-deficient, but once again after thirty minutes of being open, the wine seems like nearly perfect Fleurie. Ok, there's maybe this mineral/vitamin-deficiency issue that I can't remember and also a slight overripeness on the nose, but otherwise this is very good.
And while I might prefer slightly more red-fruitedness, for 2006 this Fleurie is about as good as it gets in 2006 Cru Beaujolais. Not overly heavy and precise (considering, that is).