originally posted by Jay Miller: They hit 1993 the way Roumier hit 1995 whereas those few 2000s I've tried have been disappointing for that usually friendly vintage.
so true on both points
originally posted by Jay Miller: They hit 1993 the way Roumier hit 1995 whereas those few 2000s I've tried have been disappointing for that usually friendly vintage.
originally posted by Jay Miller:
originally posted by Bwood:
Lafarge, on the other hand, increasingly strikes me as a producer who makes the same wines regardless of vintage and makes wines that take too long for me. The Lafarge Bourgognes are just too hard for my taste, although I will finish off the '07s I just bought and will not, I suppose, just pour them down the sink.
Whereas my experience has shown high variation. They hit 1993 the way Roumier hit 1995 whereas those few 2000s I've tried have been disappointing for that usually friendly vintage.
originally posted by Bwood:
originally posted by maureen:
originally posted by Bwood:2004 Clos de la Marechale from Rousseau
?????? Is this some inside joke?
Sorry, Maureen, it was. Long story.
(I've actually been drinking both the '04 Rousseau Lavaux St. Jacques and '04 Mugnier Clos de la Marchale and enjoying them both.)