Five more

Florida Jim

Florida Jim
Whites:

2005 Daniel Dampt, Chablis Cte de Lchet:
Day one: quiet but typical Chablis nose; layered, exotic fruit flavors that are rich, deep and honeyed, steely, crisp and long. Seems somewhat closed but what is showing is absolutely delicious and characteristic of this vineyard.
Day two: more open aromatically but much more mineral driven an almost salty element in the mouth, good fruit, intensity and concentration; considerable length. A superb wine from a producer that uses only stainless, hand harvests, keeps yields low and is aggressive with triage. This has the stuffing to age, its 13% alcohol, $30 (including shipping) and has a quality to price ratio that is becoming difficult to find in Chablis. Drink or hold.

1999 Nigl, Riesling Hochcker:
Way too fresh to be a decade old; smells of tangerine skin, rainwater and citrus; its dry, textural, intensely flavored to echo the nose and has a tang to it that I find often in Austrian riesling; exceedingly long and that tang is reiterated on the finish which has a slight pithy/resin quality to it. A very good wine that is still youthful, concentrated and balanced but shows an integration borne of its years. 13% alcohol and about $18, back in the day.

Reds:

2000 Belle Pente, Pinot Noir Estate Reserve:
Day one: tight, big, disjointed with some alcohol showing (14.3%).
Day two: more approachable with spice and dark fruit smells and flavors, pretty big in the mouth, alcoholic but not hot; moderate length. I think this is just a little too much for me. Solid wine but not in a style that I am partial to.
Day three: bordering on raisined and coming apart.
Drink.

1999 Michel Lafarge, Volnay Vendages Slectionnes:
Day one: still a bit tannic but this wine is so much better than three years ago (the last time I tried it); classic fresh cherry, beet, earth, stone nose; much the same in the mouth with some complexity, good intensity and a profile that is both hard-edged and approachable at the same time. As with all really good wines, there is a paradox (or two) in this; minerality but clear fruit; firm but open; strongly flavored but with finesse. These are the bottles we hope to find when we go back into the cellar after a decade and pull out Burgundy. With grilled chicken, rice with black pepper sauce and sauted brussel sprouts, beyond words.
Day two: this has wound back in upon itself its all about structure and tannin now, although, it comes alive accompanying pasta with tomato/almond sauce.
13% alcohol and about $35 on release.
Hold.

2002 Michaud, Brouilly Prestige de Vielles Vignes:
Day one: bright, pure gamay with an earthy/granite streak and considerable depth; aromatic, graceful and nicely integrated. Often times this bottling can be a bit tannic but this is pretty smooth.
Day two: even better, by magnitudes; there is finesse and a purity not evident yesterday; theres real complexity and still a smooth texture; and, above all, there is this deft balance as though all parts were meant to fit together just so. This is all a red wine I ever need and it pleases me no end to have more than a few bottles left in the cellar. Real old vine (greater than 85 years) quality. 13% alcohol and a bargain at $20.

Best, Jim
 
1999 Nigl, Riesling Hochcker:
Way too fresh to be a decade old; smells of tangerine skin, rainwater and citrus; its dry, textural, intensely flavored to echo the nose and has a tang to it that I find often in Austrian riesling; exceedingly long and that tang is reiterated on the finish which has a slight pithy/resin quality to it. A very good wine that is still youthful, concentrated and balanced but shows an integration borne of its years. 13% alcohol and about $18, back in the day.

Sounds great. You're killing me. I tried to buy some of this recently but it turned out only the 98 was available. I am guessing it won't be as fresh and fun as your 99.
 
I am under the impression that '98 was a strong year for Nigl. Others, say those who live in Tribeca but with West Coast nomenclature, might have more to say on the subject one way or another.
 
originally posted by Rahsaan:
1999 Nigl, Riesling Hochcker:
Way too fresh to be a decade old; smells of tangerine skin, rainwater and citrus; its dry, textural, intensely flavored to echo the nose and has a tang to it that I find often in Austrian riesling; exceedingly long and that tang is reiterated on the finish which has a slight pithy/resin quality to it. A very good wine that is still youthful, concentrated and balanced but shows an integration borne of its years. 13% alcohol and about $18, back in the day.

Sounds great. You're killing me. I tried to buy some of this recently but it turned out only the 98 was available. I am guessing it won't be as fresh and fun as your 99.

Rahsaan:
Bill Mayer has some available. He mistakenly told people he didn't have it. I bought two. One was oxidized but the other was excellent. It was fruity enough the acid didn't overwhelm the wine for me. Paired fantastically with sushi. Bill's is the Nigl Riesling Senftenberger Hochcker.
 
originally posted by Levi Dalton:
I am under the impression that '98 was a strong year for Nigl. Others, say those who live in Tribeca but with West Coast nomenclature, might have more to say on the subject one way or another.
I would prefer '99 to '98 consistently. I think the botrytis element in some of the '98s (haven't had this one in a while) is becoming too prominent for my personal taste. I think the '99s with their more even ripeness have quite a future, but my uncertainty about the future of my '98s, not just at Nigl, was such that I made a large donation at Christmas to my sister. The wine will go faster at her house where there is less competition.

I wouldn't hesistate to buy and drink a higher end '98 from Nigl now, but I wouldn't back up the truck for the long term. I would also usually opt for a '99 given the choice.
 
2005 Daniel Dampt, Chablis Cte de Lchet:
Day one: quiet but typical Chablis nose; layered, exotic fruit flavors that are rich, deep and honeyed, steely, crisp and long. Seems somewhat closed but what is showing is absolutely delicious and characteristic of this vineyard.
Day two: more open aromatically but much more mineral driven an almost salty element in the mouth, good fruit, intensity and concentration; considerable length. A superb wine from a producer that uses only stainless, hand harvests, keeps yields low and is aggressive with triage. This has the stuffing to age, its 13% alcohol, $30 (including shipping) and has a quality to price ratio that is becoming difficult to find in Chablis. Drink or hold.

Have you tried the 2004 of this? I did and was less than thrilled by it, but found it well made without manipulation, but there just wasn't much 'there' there. Perhaps it needs a riper year to show better?
 
originally posted by MarkS:
2005 Daniel Dampt, Chablis Cte de Lchet:

Have you tried the 2004 of this? I did and was less than thrilled by it, but found it well made without manipulation, but there just wasn't much 'there' there. Perhaps it needs a riper year to show better?

I have not tried the 2004's.
I think that Dampt's Chablis are usually considered vin de garde, although with riper vintages, such as 2002, I'd expect them to show better sooner.
Best, Jim
 
originally posted by SFJoe:
originally posted by Levi Dalton:
I am under the impression that '98 was a strong year for Nigl. Others, say those who live in Tribeca but with West Coast nomenclature, might have more to say on the subject one way or another.
I would prefer '99 to '98 consistently. I think the botrytis element in some of the '98s (haven't had this one in a while) is becoming too prominent for my personal taste. I think the '99s with their more even ripeness have quite a future, but my uncertainty about the future of my '98s, not just at Nigl, was such that I made a large donation at Christmas to my sister. The wine will go faster at her house where there is less competition.

I wouldn't hesistate to buy and drink a higher end '98 from Nigl now, but I wouldn't back up the truck for the long term. I would also usually opt for a '99 given the choice.

In the FWIW department, I have really liked the botrytized elements in the Knoll Schutt from 1998. But then, I quite like Thvenet Macon's.

I just pulled a 1999 Nigl Privat riesling to try. Am I being pre-mature?
 
originally posted by VLM:
I just pulled a 1999 Nigl Privat riesling to try. Am I being pre-mature?

I'm guessing Joe thinks these are for the longer term. I think they're pretty tasty now.
'Be interesting to hear what you think?
Best, Jim
 
originally posted by Florida Jim:
I'm guessing Joe thinks these are for the longer term. I think they're pretty tasty now.
I have some other things mostly ahead of these in the queue, but these are quite worthy.
 
Joe,
Ten years out on the vintage and, so far, everything I've tasted has been fresh, alive and showing almost no age. Heaven knows how long secondary development will take but it appears to be a very nice year in Austrian wine.
Best, Jim
 
That's a great Lafarge note! makes me want to open one but I'll resist awhile.
I never find Burgundy any good on day two.
 
originally posted by Tom Blach:
That's a great Lafarge note! makes me want to open one but I'll resist awhile.
I never find Burgundy any good on day two.
Really? Is that with all Burgs that you've had; young and old? Or just the higher end bottles? I believe you've probably had a wider range of Burgundies than I, but I find it surprising that none of them would be any better a day later.

I know it's not anything special, but I have to admit that I had the 2006 Bourgogne from Domaine Humbert about a month ago and thought it showed better the next day; a little smoother, fuller, a bit more complete.

Just curious.
 
For what it's worth, I was also surprised that Jim was getting so much out of tasting these wines on the 2nd and 3rd days. But that seems to be part of his style so he must know what he is doing.
 
originally posted by Rahsaan:
For what it's worth, I was also surprised that Jim was getting so much out of tasting these wines on the 2nd and 3rd days. But that seems to be part of his style so he must know what he is doing.

Actually, its not.
But I am trying to lose some weight and drinking the entire bottle with dinner is no longer on the program. So, a glass or two tonight and one tomorrow - that's the new deal for me - at least, for awhile.
BTW, lost 8 pounds in three weeks - not a lot but cutting back on the wine is all I'm doing.
How about that?
Best, Jim
 
Back
Top