NC plus Me

Rahsaan

Rahsaan
So found myself in Durham and Nathan was available with a crew of merry drinkers at Rue Cler. Which was as delicious as I have been led to expect.

Plus the wine.

We started with my bottle of 2002 Alzinger Steinertal Grner Veltliner Smaragd which had been travelling all day in the car but still showed pretty well. Rich and ripe but supple around the corners on the acids and showing very friendly and expressive. Nice way to start tasting spring dishes.

But we were on to the fresh reds.

My favorite was the 2004 Domaine le Briseau Cteaux-du-Loir Les Mortiers which started out with a bit of the peppery goodness but had such rippling fresh and character-filled fruit. Saturated for what it was and always fresh and appealing. Lovely with every dish and afterwards as well.

There was also a lot to be said for the 2004 Clos de Tue Boeuf Cheverny La Guerrerie but as Ive complained in the past, the carbonic process was a bit too evident for my tastes (you may place yourself elsewhere on the spectrum) although it was far from a chore to drink and there were some nice elements to roll around the mouth on the finish.

Similarly, I might have liked the 1996 Druet Bourgueil Vaumoreau better if it were on its own. But it had plenty going for it and only showed more finesse as the evening wore on. Much like the rest of us!

The 1991 Mayacamas Cabernet Sauvignon was sweet in comparison to the other wines. At least at first and at least for my palate. But it had plenty of detail and depth to show later. Not bad at all.

But the pace was fast and the 2004 Paul Pernot Btard-Montrachet was sent around to evoke memories of lemon chess pie for all the Southerners at the table. It evoked memories of nice fine spearminty chardonnay for me. Nothing wrong with it. In fact I liked it a lot. But then Im just a heathen. And always looking for other grapes.

So the 2005 Domaine de Bellivire Jasnires Elixir de Tuf was promising but it was prefaced with a story of leaking cork and various other problems, and it tasted like a bacterial disaster. With plenty of rich fruit along with it. Who knows?

I do know that the 2006 Domaine Bernard Baudry Chinon Franc De Pied was lovely and pure as I walked out the door. And was thankful that my wife was driving

Good times
 
originally posted by maureen:
see, we let you go out of town and there you go - drinking chardonnay!

Some people thought there was pinot noir in the La Guerrerie, but it was just the gamay plus the terroir plus the fun..
 
originally posted by Thor:
Mayacaymus
Unfortunate conflation.

Perhaps. But that is the correct spelling?

(I couldn't remember and wasn't in the mood/condition for long google-verification sessions. Plus I'm no expert on these effete and elite Ca wines..)
 
originally posted by Thor:
Mayacamas.

Caymus.

Sorta like calling a wine Musignydooker.

Thanks. Will edit. I'm not sure Maya=Musigny in any cultural framework I'm familiar with. But the general point is well taken.
 
originally posted by Thor:
Maya≠Musigny. But neither does Mayacamas=Caymus.

Lest the shade of Charlie Wagner smite you in your sleep, let me add that the gulf 'twixt Caymus and Mayacamas -- at least in '91 -- was in no way as great as that in the analogy you drew.

Mark Lipton
(self-appointed fact checker)
 
originally posted by Ian Fitzsimmons:
I'm just curious whether Nathan, strutting on his home turf, brings guns to the offlines to show around between glasses.
No strut, no unconcealed firearms and no glasses.
We drink from the bottle here in the south.
Still curious?
Best, Jim
 
originally posted by Florida Jim:
originally posted by Ian Fitzsimmons:
I'm just curious whether Nathan, strutting on his home turf, brings guns to the offlines to show around between glasses.
No strut, no unconcealed firearms and no glasses.
We drink from the bottle here in the south.
Still curious?
Best, Jim

Are there rafting trips involved, too?
 
originally posted by Don Rice:
So for the Druet, drink and/or hold?
(Hesitant to dig in to my supply just yet)

To my tastes it was showing well with air but probably still has plenty of years left, depending on personal preferences.

I don't know what Nathan thinks, because he's been following it over the years?
 
originally posted by Florida Jim:
originally posted by Ian Fitzsimmons:
I'm just curious whether Nathan, strutting on his home turf, brings guns to the offlines to show around between glasses.
No strut, no unconcealed firearms and no glasses.
We drink from the bottle here in the south.
Still curious?
Best, Jim
Nathan wears his gun outside his pants
For all the honest world to feel

I heard an interesting radio program last week where they discussed the antique American expression "above his raising." It described a person assuming higher status than that to which they're entitled, but as it happens, it indicated someone whose pomposity prevented them from drinking from the common jug. They rather insisted on their own glass.

I'm glad we don't have those sorts of pompous characters around here.
 
originally posted by SFJoe:
originally posted by Florida Jim:
originally posted by Ian Fitzsimmons:
I'm just curious whether Nathan, strutting on his home turf, brings guns to the offlines to show around between glasses.
No strut, no unconcealed firearms and no glasses.
We drink from the bottle here in the south.
Still curious?
Best, Jim
Nathan wears his gun outside his pants
For all the honest world to feel

I heard an interesting radio program last week where they discussed the antique American expression "above his raising." It described a person assuming higher status than that to which they're entitled, but as it happens, it indicated someone whose pomposity prevented them from drinking from the common jug. They rather insisted on their own glass.

I'm glad we don't have those sorts of pompous characters around here.

Fuckin' A.
Best, Jim
 
Back
Top