Lunch TNs - C. Bouchard, Arretxea, Joly, Gravner & Lopez de Heredia

Mike Klein

Mike Klein
Had lunch on Saturday with a few friends at the Brasserie in San Diego. As always, the food was great and they put up with our need for an army of stemware like champs.

We started with the NV Bouchard Inflorescence (last year's release). Just like the last bottle, everyone loves this champagne. Very creamy and vinous due to the lower pressure at bottling. All red berries in the mouth and that real sweetness that comes from ripe fruit - not dosage. Interestingly, one of my friends who was visiting from Biarritz (and who is a huge wine guy) had never heard of this -but he liked it very much. I really need to try Bouchard's other champagnes.

With some tuna tartare appetizers we had a bottle of the '06 Arretxea Iroleguy Hegoxuri which is a white Gros Manseng blend (I think). My friend carried this over from France and we were glad he did. This is like bottled liquid sunshine. One of those wines you could drink gallons of. Melons and spring herbs on the nose and refreshing citrus on the palate. I don't have any experience with whites from Iroleguy so I can't say if it is typical or not - but I will say these should get broader exposure in the U.S. if this bottle was representative!

Next up was the '96 Joly Coulee de Serrant which I opened with a little trepidation. Like others, I've had mixed results with Joly's wines - but this one was superb. The nose was all over the place for a half hour or so but sorted itself out nicely with some air. Polish, flint and wool on the nose and the wine really drove across the palate with a ton of energy and lifted citrus acidity. A big, dramatic wine.

I was a little dissapointed with the '02 Gravner Anfora. My first time with this wine and I will give it props for the most unique nose I've ever encountered. Cardomom, cinnamon, tea and other "who knows what". But this wine lacked energy in the mouth. Sort of a wierd combination of exotic scents with uncompromising dryness and a lack of perceptible acidity. I can see why others might like this but it just didn't speak to anyone at the table and was the only bottle that came home half empty.

We then moved on to an interesting wine that was also brought over from France - the '07 Jean-Baptiste Senat Minervois Bois de Merveilles. I didn't catch the full explanation of this one but I think it is a blend of southern rhone grapes. Wildly fruity nose and it tasted like barrel sample. Very pure and had a fresh berry compote/confected quality to it. But the alcohol was literally undectable. Almost like drinking fruit juice. It wasn't my thing but I don't think I've ever had a wine that was so concentrated but had such undectable alcohol.

We finished with the '81 Lopez de Heredia Bosconia Grand Reserva which, to keep it simple, absolutely rocked. The color on this bottle was almost completely bricked but this wine was loaded with broth, leather, tea and perfume on the nose. More of the same on the palate with beautiful fruit and a wonderful elegance. And no lack of density here. Went great with the meat course.
 
originally posted by Mike Klein:
I was a little dissapointed with the '02 Gravner Anfora. My first time with this wine and I will give it props for the most unique nose I've ever encountered. Cardomom, cinnamon, tea and other "who knows what". But this wine lacked energy in the mouth. Sort of a wierd combination of exotic scents with uncompromising dryness and a lack of perceptible acidity. I can see why others might like this but it just didn't speak to anyone at the table and was the only bottle that came home half empty.

An acquired taste, as they say.
Perhaps, you will have the right dish with it and all will be revealed.
Personally, its one of the most compelling wines I have had in years - enough so that it got me to make a skin-fermented white myself.
Best, Jim
 
Nice notes, thanks. When I last drank '81 Bosconia a year back our bottle was almost suspiciously young and vibrant, tasting a decade or more younger than the '81 Tondonia alongside. Lots of variation to be found in these older bottles.

Was the Gravner the Ribolla Gialla or Breg?
 
My kind of lunch!

Sorry about the Gravner. I don't drink a lot of it, but I have noticed that the more recent vintages are wide in the nose and muted on the palate. This wasn't so in older vintages, but I have faith that aging will reward this new gen.
 
Bouchard champagnes are wonderful. try searching for the Roses de Jeane bottling. Wonderful stuff. they are available in Lavinia in Paris

Regarding orange wines, they do not do the trick for me
 
originally posted by Florida Jim:
originally posted by Mike Klein:
I was a little dissapointed with the '02 Gravner Anfora. My first time with this wine and I will give it props for the most unique nose I've ever encountered. Cardomom, cinnamon, tea and other "who knows what". But this wine lacked energy in the mouth. Sort of a wierd combination of exotic scents with uncompromising dryness and a lack of perceptible acidity. I can see why others might like this but it just didn't speak to anyone at the table and was the only bottle that came home half empty.

An acquired taste, as they say.
Perhaps, you will have the right dish with it and all will be revealed.
Personally, its one of the most compelling wines I have had in years - enough so that it got me to make a skin-fermented white myself.
Best, Jim

I think this is the same year that Steve & I had (ribolla). I definately thought it was interesting, but not worth the tariff, nor was it the geek's wet dream either. Personally, I'd prefer a Bea. At least with Bea, you get fruit and aroma, instead of ancient-muffled flavors hiding under a pile of unwashed clothes. That being said, I wouldn't mind seeing how Gravner's style has evolved in the ensuing years...but this is a moving target with him, isn't it?
 
So good to hear a positive note about the 96 Joly. I guess not every bottle of this vintage is a prematurely oxidized train wreck. It showed so much promise when released.
 
Jim, Slaton, Joe & Mark:

The Gravner was the Breg and we tried it with a couple of different courses but it just didn't sing. But then I'm a sucker for high acid whites and this was certainly not that. I can see how it was probably a little closed and further ageing could certainly help that. But the lack of acidity was a problem for me. I'll look forward to trying some others.

Zach,

Guilty as charged on the duplicate post! Then again, I thought the folks here might be a bit more interested in these wines given the notable lack of high octane juice...

Don,

I will absolutely look for the Roses de Jeane champagnes. I wish they got a little more time on the lees before release but I understand these guys have to make a living.

Don,

The Joly really was nice and continued to expand on day 2. I bought this bottle from my local shop several years after release and it really surprised me that it showed so well. The cork was soaked and when we popped it, I had already half-way written it off. Must have been Murphy's law in reverse effect - my expectations were low so the wine outperformed just to make a point!
 
originally posted by Don Rice:
So good to hear a positive note about the 96 Joly. I guess not every bottle of this vintage is a prematurely oxidized train wreck. It showed so much promise when released.
A delicious bottle with the gang last night. In a great place, though the whole cork was wet. (Good fill).
 
originally posted by SFJoe:
originally posted by Don Rice:
So good to hear a positive note about the 96 Joly. I guess not every bottle of this vintage is a prematurely oxidized train wreck. It showed so much promise when released.
A delicious bottle with the gang last night. In a great place, though the whole cork was wet. (Good fill).

Yeah! Don, my last two bottles have been spectacular. Drink and hold.
 
Back
Top