U
Unknown
Guest
originally posted by Cole Kendall:
Was Contador's move to lose Kloeden as stupid as it seemed?
total bonehead, no matter how you look at it
seriously pissed me off
originally posted by Cole Kendall:
Was Contador's move to lose Kloeden as stupid as it seemed?
Yes, thoroughly jingoistic, VLM. Bravo for your insight. But... what were the jingoistic features in my discourse, please? I didn't quite catch them myself. Perhaps you would like to point them out to me? It's just my bad journalistic habit: before we use an offensive adjective, we like to have enough facts at hand to justify its use...Victor and his jingoistic support of Contador
originally posted by .sasha:
originally posted by Cole Kendall:
Was Contador's move to lose Kloeden as stupid as it seemed?
total bonehead, no matter how you look at it
seriously pissed me off
originally posted by VS:
Yes, thoroughly jingoistic, VLM. Bravo for your insight. But... what were the jingoistic features in my discourse, please? I didn't quite catch them myself. Perhaps you would like to point them out to me? It's just my bad journalistic habit: before we use an offensive adjective, we like to have enough facts at hand to justify its use...Victor and his jingoistic support of Contador
Anyway, I'll try to make amends on my own. Here's an attempt at avoiding jingoism:
Contador was passable today in the time trial.
OK? Or is that still too strident?
originally posted by VS:
It was such a sweet parting potshot by Bruyneel: he covered the time trial with his car behind - his Tour-leading team leader? No, of course. He followed his buddy Armstrong.
By the way, former Formula One champ Fernando Alonso announced yesterday he intends to form a new cycling team around Contador. His buddy.
originally posted by VS:
It was such a sweet parting potshot by Bruyneel: he covered the time trial with his car behind - his Tour-leading team leader? No, of course. He followed his buddy Armstrong.
originally posted by Cole Kendall:
As a recovering empiricist (albeit in matters far from cycling) I have to admit that I found the following quite fascinating:
http://www.sportsscientists.com/2009/07/tour-2009-contador-climb.html
And me, thinking that I had just proven my objectivity here by providing lists of truly horrible Spanish wines... :-)originally posted by VLM:
Victor, you are way too sensitive.
This was in reference to your supposed defense of all things Spanish.
originally posted by VLM:
originally posted by Cole Kendall:
As a recovering empiricist (albeit in matters far from cycling) I have to admit that I found the following quite fascinating:
http://www.sportsscientists.com/2009/07/tour-2009-contador-climb.html
Interesting. The gradient factor is the black box here. How it is calculated doesn't make much sense to me. Linearizing something that is clearly non-linear is fraught with problems.