Just to clarify, I'm assuming by "parkerized," you mean fruit-forward, heavy bodied, high-alcohol, and oaky? I generally don't like those types of wines...I had assumed Montrose was lighter and more restrained. But maybe I was reading about older Montrose wines. Well, that is disappointing news. Is Bordeaux now basically just Napa, France?
But, it may be the case that I do like those types of wines. I remember drinking a 2004 St. Emilion a couple of months ago and liking it. However, it didn't seem super-fruity to me or overtly new world. A fairly restrained wine, no gobs of fruit or such, albeit it was "clean," smooth, and perhaps "modern" tasting. Maybe the restraint though was just a product of the vintage?
Though I must confess I don't have a full grasp of the terminology. Does "parkerized" = "modern" = "spoofed?" I thought "spoofed" meant bland and generic, industrially processed wine, i.e., wine that tastes like Mondavi California Cab or Yellow Tail (which I don't like). And I assumed, spoofed, modern, and parkerized were fairly interchangeable.
But are the terms "spoofed, modern, parkerized," or what have you broader than that, by which I mean, Bordeaux tastes different from Napa, but Bordeaux has become homogenized into a singular flavor profile indistinguishable from each other, but different from wines from other regions? Or do they mean that Montrose, Talbot, Branaire, et al., taste like Mondavi, Beringer, Yellow Tail, etc.? Or do they mean something else entirely?
Though perhaps I'm overanalyzing everything at this point and should just drink and not worry about it so much.