some Pacalet's 06

originally posted by Ian Fitzsimmons:

You seem like a nice guy, lucertoran, thank you for posting notes. Claude and Sharon are pretty nice folks, too. My feeling is that they were mainly trying to understand your abbreviations so they could try to respond. I had difficulty with the abbreviations, too; nothing personal. Talking about Burgundy, more so than elsewhere, you can reasonably ask for a bit of precision, without being pedantic.

Welcome aboard.
Oh, Ian....

And, hey, when did 'welcome aboard' become a way to welcome someone new-ish here?
 
originally posted by lucertoran:
originally posted by Claude Kolm:
originally posted by Sharon Bowman:

It's as though I said, "I have a rodent as a pet."
Not even. Because if you have a mouse, it is accurate to describe it as a rodent. If you have a Charmes-Chambertin, technically, it is not correct to describe it as a Gevrey-Chambertin unless it has been declassified, in which case it no longer is a Charmes-Chambertin (but you can use the lieux-dit "Charmes" or "Mazoyres", as the case may be, on the same label with Gevrey-Chambertin for the declassified wine).

See, those of us who aren't religious had to have something to do to fill in for that lack of ridiculous specificity.
You should file a complaint form and send it to the politburo.
It is a shame that they accepted such an uneducated person(me) to post here.

Yeah, fucking politburo. Hundred flowers, not hundred weeds.

Fuck off.
 
I've learned nothing about Pacalet in this thread. I hear his wines are really good for the Christmas season.
 
originally posted by .sasha:
I've learned nothing about Pacalet in this thread. I hear his wines are really good for the Christmas season.
[/quote man,come over we will drink some.
It is quite hard to get feed back on pretty much any subject approached over here.
I still consult the board 30 times a day!!!!!!!
 
originally posted by Ian Fitzsimmons:
originally posted by lucertoran:
originally posted by Claude Kolm:
originally posted by Sharon Bowman:

It's as though I said, "I have a rodent as a pet."
Not even. Because if you have a mouse, it is accurate to describe it as a rodent. If you have a Charmes-Chambertin, technically, it is not correct to describe it as a Gevrey-Chambertin unless it has been declassified, in which case it no longer is a Charmes-Chambertin (but you can use the lieux-dit "Charmes" or "Mazoyres", as the case may be, on the same label with Gevrey-Chambertin for the declassified wine).

See, those of us who aren't religious had to have something to do to fill in for that lack of ridiculous specificity.
You should file a complaint form and send it to the politburo.
It is a shame that they accepted such an uneducated person(me) to post here.

You seem like a nice guy, lucertoran, thank you for posting notes. Claude and Sharon are pretty nice folks, too. My feeling is that they were mainly trying to understand your abbreviations so they could try to respond. I had difficulty with the abbreviations, too; nothing personal. Talking about Burgundy, more so than elsewhere, you can reasonably ask for a bit of precision, without being pedantic.

Welcome aboard.oh,la,la,la....private club over here? New-ish, Lurkers....
I wish I knew how much Gallons a day people over are drinking!
It will help on reconsidering the New-ish terminology.
 
originally posted by lucertoran:
originally posted by Ian Fitzsimmons:
originally posted by lucertoran:
originally posted by Claude Kolm:
originally posted by Sharon Bowman:

It's as though I said, "I have a rodent as a pet."
Not even. Because if you have a mouse, it is accurate to describe it as a rodent. If you have a Charmes-Chambertin, technically, it is not correct to describe it as a Gevrey-Chambertin unless it has been declassified, in which case it no longer is a Charmes-Chambertin (but you can use the lieux-dit "Charmes" or "Mazoyres", as the case may be, on the same label with Gevrey-Chambertin for the declassified wine).

See, those of us who aren't religious had to have something to do to fill in for that lack of ridiculous specificity.
You should file a complaint form and send it to the politburo.
It is a shame that they accepted such an uneducated person(me) to post here.

You seem like a nice guy, lucertoran, thank you for posting notes. Claude and Sharon are pretty nice folks, too. My feeling is that they were mainly trying to understand your abbreviations so they could try to respond. I had difficulty with the abbreviations, too; nothing personal. Talking about Burgundy, more so than elsewhere, you can reasonably ask for a bit of precision, without being pedantic.

Welcome aboard.oh,la,la,la....private club over here? New-ish, Lurkers....
I wish I knew how much Gallons a day people over are drinking!
It will help on reconsidering the New-ish terminology.
I MEANT OVER HERE!!!! SEE I AM DRINKING
 
originally posted by lucertoran:
Joe why did you not came wizz' us.
that 08' was showing great,way more precise that 05'06'&07'.

Work, work, work.

Glad to hear, will have to buy one from you guys when you're back in action.
 
Back
Top