originally posted by Lee Short:
The wine in question is the '72. Schneider's of Capitol Hill. They had 17 bottles remaining when I got off the phone with them.
originally posted by slaton:
I assume he means the Briailles PV. Vineyard is not designated on the website.
Good price, but this comes from a period Coates describes as underperforming for the estate, due to a combination of wide replanting (= very young vines) and neglect.
No personal experience to report, though.
originally posted by Yule Kim:
originally posted by slaton:
I assume he means the Briailles PV. Vineyard is not designated on the website.
Good price, but this comes from a period Coates describes as underperforming for the estate, due to a combination of wide replanting (= very young vines) and neglect.
No personal experience to report, though.
I think Sasha mentioned the same thing; that Briailles didn't really get good until the mid-80s when the family started to take a more active role in the vineyard. It was part of the reason why I was a little leery of buying a bottle for myself.
But, I ended up getting one, if for no other reason but to try a very old burg for a moderate price. Hopefully it will turn out ok.
originally posted by Yule Kim:
But, I ended up getting one, if for no other reason but to try a very old burg for a moderate price. Hopefully it will turn out ok.
originally posted by Rahsaan:
originally posted by Yule Kim:
But, I ended up getting one, if for no other reason but to try a very old burg for a moderate price. Hopefully it will turn out ok.
Open it and put us out of our mysterious curious misery!
originally posted by Ned Hoey:
17 bottles. That sounds like a cellar release rather than from a cellar purchase. In that case it could even be reconditioned. Fresh label? Importer strip?
Each item presents a new case despite Andrew's bad luck. If the bottle is sound, and original, I suspect it will be a bit tight and bound up, then it will open over about 45-60 mins to being correct and pleasant but not distinguished. Light cherry and wild strawberry, sous bois, that kind of thing. That's my prediction.
I hope it's enjoyable anyway.
originally posted by Brian C:
I passed as it seemed like a lot of travel for a questionable wine to start with.
originally posted by Ned Hoey:
originally posted by Brian C:
I passed as it seemed like a lot of travel for a questionable wine to start with.
Is $40 really a gamble for 35 year old Burgundy? Provenance sounds reasonable, shit that's a giveaway.
originally posted by Ned Hoey:
Is $40 really a gamble for 35 year old Burgundy? Provenance sounds reasonable, shit that's a giveaway.
originally posted by .sasha:
originally posted by Yule Kim:
originally posted by slaton:
I assume he means the Briailles PV. Vineyard is not designated on the website.
Good price, but this comes from a period Coates describes as underperforming for the estate, due to a combination of wide replanting (= very young vines) and neglect.
No personal experience to report, though.
I think Sasha mentioned the same thing; that Briailles didn't really get good until the mid-80s when the family started to take a more active role in the vineyard. It was part of the reason why I was a little leery of buying a bottle for myself.
But, I ended up getting one, if for no other reason but to try a very old burg for a moderate price. Hopefully it will turn out ok.
.sasha did say that. What's interesting, however, is how quickly things turned around - for example, 85 Bressandes is already quite wonderful, if not in the same league as 88 or 91.
earliest I've had was the 1990 Clos de Roi. That and the '93 were both certainly of very high quality.
originally posted by Rahsaan:
originally posted by Ned Hoey:
Is $40 really a gamble for 35 year old Burgundy? Provenance sounds reasonable, shit that's a giveaway.
Anything is a gamble if you value your money and have other ways to spend it.
(Not that I'm saying the price is too high)