Lifestyles of the Rich and Not Famous

Oswaldo Costa

Oswaldo Costa
Spent the weekend at a beautiful 1,500 hectare farm in the interior of So Paulo. The hosts, friends of my sister and brother-in-law, were people of considerable means, unpretentious and generous. The six of us were graced with a fair amount of distinguished blue chips, an interesting contrast to our daily fare.

1988 Chateau Latour Pauillac
Two bottles with Friday dinner one with Saturday dinner, showing consistent flavors. Oak vanilla, sage, tar and prunes. Good acidity, resolved tannins, rather light bodied at (excessive) serving temperature. Second and third bottles had a bit more body, but similar aromatics. Classy and pleasurable, but no epiphany.

2000 Chateau Calon-Sgur St. Estphe
Two bottles with Saturday lunch, the first as described, the second heat cooked. Oak vanilla, blackberries, leather and eucalyptus. Decent acidity, good weight, good balance, pleasant tannins. Textbook Bordeaux and a bit boring in its Platonic exemplariness. My, how we have become spoiled.

2007 Louis Jadot Corton-Charlemagne Grand Cru 13.5%
One bottle with Saturday dinner. Lovely bright mineral (wet slate) and anis aromas. Marcia got peach blossom, honey and almonds, and preferred nose to mouth. Good weight, good acid/sweet balance, judicious oak, light final bitterness. Classy and textbook, but not boring.

1983 Chteau Ptrus Pomerol
One bottle with Sunday lunch. Tar, prunes, leather and bay leaves. Exquisitely balanced, refined, wearing a three piece pin-striped suit, not one hair out of place. Like a high society Zen Master who has nothing to prove. Exceptionally fine, but, given the outlandish reputation, no cigar box.

1993 Chteau dYquem Sauternes 14.0%
Half of a previously opened bottle with Sunday lunch. Apricots, honey, botrytis, and a strong note of mothballs. Unctuous, fine acid/sweet balance, seamless. The mothballs, ordinarily not something to savor, here prevented it from becoming good boy dull, pushing it into more than the sum of its parts terrain.

1997 Chteau Climens Barsac 14.0%
Half of a previously opened bottle with Sunday lunch. Apricots and honey. Seemed dilute after the Yquem, but otherwise fine and delicious.

1996 Chteau Guiraud Sauternes 13.5%
Half of a previously opened bottle with Sunday lunch. More apricots and honey, but thick and sweet, veering towards flabby, needs more acid.

It was fascinating to dive into a prelapsarian state for 48 hours, but it was also good to confirm that what we drink at home, while not up to such pedigreed standards, makes up for it in terms of quirkiness and investigative interest. Tons of money, especially in other peoples hands, are not a prerequisite for wine epiphanies, but it was interesting to note how the other side often leads a more predictable and boring life.
 
Tons of money, especially in other peoples hands, are not a prerequisite for wine epiphanies, but it was interesting to note how the other side often leads a more predictable and boring life.

But surely having tons of money does not preclude drinking Ptrus and Poulsard.

Sounds like an interesting weekend.
 
originally posted by Rahsaan:But surely having tons of money does not preclude drinking Ptrus and Poulsard.

No, the wealthy that I've met here seem mostly brand driven and unadventurous in their wine choices - nearly 100% red Bordeaux and white Burgundy, with the odd DRC or La Tache -, and maybe that applies to some extent to the rich everywhere. At the other end, maybe there is some correlation between not having much money and having to ferret out unheralded gems to maximise meager dollars.
 
originally posted by Oswaldo Costa:
2000 Chateau Calon-Sgur St. Estphe
My, how we have become spoiled.
You got mice in your pockets?
Exquisitely balanced, refined, wearing a three piece pin-striped suit, not one hair out of place. Like a high society Zen Master who has nothing to prove.
A Zen master in a suit - I'll have to think about that one.

I have, upon occasion, drunk with prosporous folks and discovered that I don't much care for most Bordeaux, no matter its pedigree or vintage.
Most, not all.
Best, Jim
 
originally posted by Oswaldo Costa:
1983 Chteau Ptrus Pomerol
One bottle with Sunday lunch. Tar, prunes, leather and bay leaves. Exquisitely balanced, refined, wearing a three piece pin-striped suit, not one hair out of place. Like a high society Zen Master who has nothing to prove. Exceptionally fine, but, given the outlandish reputation, no cigar box.

Your bottle was better-behaved than one I tasted a year ago in London:

1983 Petrus - a crazy nose of cigar box and dirty spice and rotten leafy stuff (rotten tobacco), then a tacky persistence with licorice and a lot of acidity on the palate.

Whenever I go to wealthy people's homes, I like to start with a Montrachet kir.

To be less snarkaholic, I'll just say that Bordeaux and white Burgundy are also the stock-in-trade of very middle-of-the-road folk in certain countries (such as this one).
 
originally posted by Oswaldo Costa: maybe that applies to some extent to the rich everywhere. At the other end, maybe there is some correlation between not having much money and having to ferret out unheralded gems to maximise meager dollars.

The social scientist in me says that there is probably a lot more mileage in that second correlation between not having much money and being forced to find unheralded gems.

So that means that there is some correlation between having a lot of money and being able to easily buy the obvious Big Name choices. But, I think you'd need a lot of other factors besides just money (age, manner of obtaining wealth, education, palate, personality, friends, other hobbies, etc, etc) to make any solid connection with drinking preferences.
 
originally posted by SFJoe:
One has to wonder how many of the bottles that say '83 Petrus also contain that wine?

Because of the famous London restaurant story, I examined the cork carefully and it looked legit. Of course, my Ptrus cork expertise only goes so far...
 
originally posted by Rahsaan:
So that means that there is some correlation between having a lot of money and being able to easily buy the obvious Big Name choices. But, I think you'd need a lot of other factors besides just money (age, manner of obtaining wealth, education, palate, personality, friends, other hobbies, etc, etc) to make any solid connection with drinking preferences.

Time for research on the drinking preferences of second generation immigrants who receive massive windfalls.
 
originally posted by Oswaldo Costa: Time for research on the drinking preferences of second generation immigrants who receive massive windfalls.

I'd settle for research on young professors named Rahsaan who receive massive windfalls.
 
Thanks, Osvaldo. I agree that it is interesting to see that the well-to-do have very splendid labels but the wine isn't really that much more splendid....
 
originally posted by SFJoe:
No, the '83 is the famous one IIRC.

???? I thought that it was the '82 that merited the PPP (Perfect Parker Points) and instantly went stratospheric in pricing. Let's check... yep, the '82 is selling for ~$2K per 750 whereas the '83 is lagging behind at ~$1200 per 750. Silly prices, both, but my point's still valid.

Mark Lipton
 
originally posted by MLipton:
originally posted by SFJoe:
No, the '83 is the famous one IIRC.

???? I thought that it was the '82 that merited the PPP (Perfect Parker Points) and instantly went stratospheric in pricing. Let's check... yep, the '82 is selling for ~$2K per 750 whereas the '83 is lagging behind at ~$1200 per 750. Silly prices, both, but my point's still valid.

Mark Lipton
Forgive me.

faded memories.

I don't drink enough Petrus.
 
originally posted by Sharon Bowman:
You're so right to use it for your braises.

I personally prefer it mixed with coke.

Moi aussi. Then boiled in a spoon over an open gas flame and injected straight into my radial artery.
 
Back
Top