DC and Champans. Plus More Wine, Food, Fun, People, Etc.

Rahsaan

Rahsaan
I found myself in DC this weekend for my wifes exhibition opening and of course I had to arrange a little wine-and-food get together with some folks. Maureen and Bob and a few others were kind enough to organize a lovely evening with amazing food and more than enough choices of wine. What could be better!

When I arrived it was the time to sip 1998 Maximin Grnhuser Herrenberg Riesling Kabinett which was a lively way to awaken the taste buds. Stern crisp refreshing and delicate although I might be tempted to let this age further to see if it starts picking up any additional characteristics? (Not that it matters because I dont own any)

As we sat down to Bobs delightful onion tart with black garlic, we debated pairings with the 1993 Pieropan Recioto di Soave Le Colombare and the 1998 Zind Humbrecht Clos Windsbuhl Riesling Vendanges Tardives. Personally, I thought the Recioto was a better match because of its delightfully rich yet firm and savory palate that was very deep and hugged the edges of the creamy onion tart like a dream. Fun wine. Others preferred the ZH, which was no slouch either, but for me it was still a bit loose when we opened it. I much preferred it later in the evening when it had firmed up and integrated better, although it was always carrying a firm juicy dollop of sugar. A sturdy off-dry wine with fine points inside. Also plenty of fun!

As we transitioned to the main course it was time to play a Burgundy Game. The centerpiece of the game was three unmarked decanters holding 1999 Comtes Lafon Volnay Champans, 1999 Joseph Voillot Volnay Champans, and 1999 dAngerville Volnay Champans. There was also a decanter of 2006 Pousse dOr Volnay Les Caillerets just to see if anyone would get fooled.

Once all the wines were poured the 2006 Caillerets was easy to pick because it was the one that didnt seem as similar to the others! But it showed more elegantly than I think many of us expected. At first it was gentle and crisp and delightfully delicate but then it stretched out with air and began to do things that were more difficult to read.

Among the 99s, there was a universal preference for the decanter holding what turned out to be the dAngerville (although there was not universal agreement about what was in that decanter!) It was the most integrated and the silkiest and the most nuanced. It was lovely. A few of us thought the Lafon was too big toasty and brash (from the oak?). For my tastes, the Voillot had more pleasure than the Lafon, but others complained of volatility and lack of fruit. Admittedly, it changed a lot with air and I liked it best at the end of the evening when it had gotten its act together and firmed up and begun silking onto the palate. There was pleasure to be had from these wines but I think the universal (and somewhat predictable) consensus was that they would show better in a few years. Regardless, it was good fun.

Of course we were still not finished. And aside from various parlor activities related to various guests interests, there was cheese and then dessert! We went back to the white wine for this progression of tastes, and began passing around 1998 JJ Prm Wehlener Sonnenuhr Riesling Kabinett and 2008 Vollenweider Krover Steffanisberg Riesling Sptlese. The Prm was harder to get a read on at this point because it was speaking very softly and gently while my palate and senses were being bombarded with so many things. It will probably give more joy to whoever took the remains home at the end of the evening. The Vollenweider was easier to drink because of the sugar and it was a pretty and gentle wine in its own right. Refreshing 2008 Sptlese.

But we were not to be sated with gentle and refreshing. We needed something bigger and bolder for the delightful walnut-studded carrot cake. After rummaging through all the choices we decided to start with the 1989 Bongran Macon-Cless Cuve Tradition Spciale Botrytis that had somehow managed to survive in Bobs cellar. It was really more of a joke than anything, because it was a difficult mouthful of limp aging botrytis with all the brown appley notes I did not want to drink. But the mission of Opening was accomplished.

We then settled into the table with 2002 Pierre Bise Quarts de Chaume and 1995 Baumard Quarts de Chaume, both of which offered plenty of pleasure. The Pierre Bise was full-on lip-smacking unctuous liquoreux sticky pleasure when opened, but it calmed down and showed some nuance with air. The Baumard was obviously further along its path towards mellowness but still with plenty of vibrant tingling fruit and I hope someone is enjoying the remnants of that bottle today!

Lots of fun. Thanks again to everyone!
 
originally posted by Rahsaan:
DC and Champans. Plus More Wine, Food, Fun, People, Etc.I found myself in DC this weekend for my wifes exhibition opening and of course I had to arrange a little wine-and-food get together with some folks. Maureen and Bob and a few others were kind enough to organize a lovely evening with amazing food and more than enough choices of wine. What could be better!

Your wife is doing exhibitions, now? Last I heard she was in the urban planning biz. Has this changed, or is this some 21st C form of urban planning?

1998 Zind Humbrecht Clos Windsbuhl Riesling Vendanges Tardives. [...] A sturdy off-dry wine with fine points inside.

And lots of them!!

Among the 99s, there was a universal preference for the decanter holding what turned out to be the dAngerville (although there was not universal agreement about what was in that decanter!) It was the most integrated and the silkiest and the most nuanced. It was lovely. A few of us thought the Lafon was too big toasty and brash (from the oak?). For my tastes, the Voillot had more pleasure than the Lafon, but others complained of volatility and lack of fruit. Admittedly, it changed a lot with air and I liked it best at the end of the evening when it had gotten its act together and firmed up and begun silking onto the palate. There was pleasure to be had from these wines but I think the universal (and somewhat predictable) consensus was that they would show better in a few years. Regardless, it was good fun.

No surprise there about the d'Angerville. I have yet to be wowed by a red Lafon, even after his '88 Champans, among a few others.

It sounds like a fun time. Thanks for the notes!
Mark Lipton
 
originally posted by MLipton:
Your wife is doing exhibitions, now? Last I heard she was in the urban planning biz. Has this changed, or is this some 21st C form of urban planning?

Her first degree was urban planning but her second degree was photography. When we had dinner in London I think she was still straddling the urban planning and the art world, but that was back in early 07 and she pretty much made a strong turn to commit fully to the art world later that year.

Although her interest in urban planning still carries over into the photos as the subject is often space and its use.

1998 Zind Humbrecht Clos Windsbuhl Riesling Vendanges Tardives. [...] A sturdy off-dry wine with fine points inside.

And lots of them!!

Does it really have lots of points?

It wasn't a blockbuster but it wasn't too delicate. It was a nice inbetween wine.
 
originally posted by MLipton:
originally posted by Rahsaan]

Among the 99s, there was a universal preference for the decanter holding what turned out to be the dAngerville (although there was not universal agreement about what was in that decanter!) It was the most integrated and the silkiest and the most nuanced. It was lovely. A few of us thought the Lafon was too big toasty and brash (from the oak?). For my tastes, the Voillot had more pleasure than the Lafon, but others complained of volatility and lack of fruit. Admittedly, it changed a lot with air and I liked it best at the end of the evening when it had gotten its act together and firmed up and begun silking onto the palate. There was pleasure to be had from these wines but I think the universal (and somewhat predictable) consensus was that they would show better in a few years. Regardless, it was good fun.

No surprise there about the d'Angerville. I have yet to be wowed by a red Lafon, even after his '88 Champans, among a few others.

It sounds like a fun time. Thanks for the notes!
Mark Lipton

Same here.

I've never had red Lafon wines more than 10-15 years old, but I have never been a fan of the wines I've tried. Easy choice between d'Angerville and (red) Lafon for me.
 
our host wanted us to taste the volnays blind and guess which was which - it was easy to discern the pousse d'or from the others as the three champans were darker and deeper (but the pousse d'or was delightful). It was also easy to tell the lafon from the other two as it was darker from more new oak and the temperature of the wine was slightly higher (due to our host's tendency to bring his bottles up from the cellar earlier than I do). Ascertaining which was the voillot vs. the d'angerville was complicated for me by the fact that I'd had the two against each other a couple of years ago and in that showdown, the voillot was much more approachable than the d'angerville and hence more enjoyable. Not so Saturday night - the d'angerville was more accessible that evening.

The Z-H was quite good - underrated by those usually posting on this board - but take it from a Trimbach lover, Z-H usually makes very good wines from certain sites and riesling from Windsbuhl is one of them.
 
Lafon does not use a lot of new wood. If I recall correctly, he did use stems in 1999 (my notes aren't here right now) - d'Angerville didn't and I suspect Voillot didn't.

Count me as a fan of Lafon's reds (as well as the whites). His three Volnays (Santenots-du-Milieu, Champans, and the lacy Clos des Chnes) are each quite different and reflective of their respective appellations.
 
well, in any event it was darker and not as attractive saturday night as the other two - I do recall that you were quite enthusiastic re lafon's 99 chamapans in your newsletter - perhaps next time I have it, I will be too.

I generally like stems in the winemaking so perhaps the issue saturday was temperature - or just where it was in its evolution.
 
Maureen -- Temperature could have a lot to do with it.

Keep in mind, too, that Champans gives a fleshy, round wine. It ideally is a fun and gratifying wine to drink but it is not anywhere near as distinguished as a Caillerets, a Taillepieds, or a Clos des Ducs (which one readily sees at d'Angerville because the estate owns vines in all four vineyards). I can easily see that for many, the more elegant interpretation by d'Angerville of those characteristics would be a more attractive expression of Champans than that of Lafon.
 
Claude, really, you shouldn't dis the facile charm of Champans. I have been hankering for one since the start of this thread. We can't all be impeccably bred.

It hasn't the distinction of the other clos mentioned, but, as I once (baroquely) put it, "Le Volnay Champans bat rouge comme ton cur" or some such.
 
originally posted by Sharon Bowman:
Claude, really, you shouldn't dis the facile charm of Champans. I have been hankering for one since the start of this thread. We can't all be impeccably bred.

It hasn't the distinction of the other clos mentioned, but, as I once (baroquely) put it, "Le Volnay Champans bat rouge comme ton cur" or some such.
Sharon -- Not dissing, and I like your description of Champans. A vineyard need not be top tier (and I consider Champans to be at or near the head of the second tier of Volnay vineyeards - still high praise as I am a Volnayphile) to be a wonderful experience if you appreciate it for its characteristics and in the right context. Although ultimately one can achieve a ranking of vineyards (e.g., La Tche is greater than Latricires-Chambertin) or composers (Bach is greater than Rameau) or whatever, I deplore the thought that such rankings, as opposed to individual characteristics, should be a guide to what to experience at any particular moment.
 
originally posted by Claude Kolm: Keep in mind, too, that Champans gives a fleshy, round wine...I can easily see that for many, the more elegant interpretation by d'Angerville of those characteristics would be a more attractive expression of Champans than that of Lafon.

That is probably the answer and in fact during dinner I was thinking of some previous experiences with Champans and then reading I had done about the round character of the vineyard.

But thoughts (and tastes) were flying fast..
 
originally posted by Rahsaan:
originally posted by Claude Kolm: Keep in mind, too, that Champans gives a fleshy, round wine...I can easily see that for many, the more elegant interpretation by d'Angerville of those characteristics would be a more attractive expression of Champans than that of Lafon.

That is probably the answer and in fact during dinner I was thinking of some previous experiences with Champans and then reading I had done about the round character of the vineyard.

But thoughts (and tastes) were flying fast..
Keep in mind that a more attractive expression of the vineyard does not automatically make for a more valid expression.
 
originally posted by Claude Kolm:Keep in mind that a more attractive expression of the vineyard does not automatically make for a more valid expression.

yeah, yeah, yeah - quit trying to defend your overly enthusiastic opinion of lafon's champans....:)
 
originally posted by maureen:
originally posted by Claude Kolm:Keep in mind that a more attractive expression of the vineyard does not automatically make for a more valid expression.

yeah, yeah, yeah - quit trying to defend your overly enthusiastic opinion of lafon's champans....:)
Hey, you won't find me turning down d'Angerville; but I even know people in the trade who say that they think Lafon's reds are better than his whites -- I'm not prepared to go that far (although the reds may be more consistent than the whites, in part due to weather factors).
 
Back
Top