Remache Reminisce

Levi Dalton

Levi Dalton
Eddie Remache was my college roommate. Eddie was a confident guy. And a Counter. He used to count the looks he would get from female passersby. As in "1 that girl just looked at me 2 that lady just glanced at me 3 she is pretending not to look at me." We would walk down the street and Eddie would be counting along "One, two, three, four..." as he made his tally. I would be talking about Jackson Pollock or Nietzsche (I used to talk a lot about Nietzsche) or some movie I had just seen, and Eddie would half pretend to listen. Those kind of concerns were of little consquence to Eddie. The Goodfellas spoof in Swingers is so funny! "Five." Keep the ice cubes cold, I love it! "Six." Vince Vaughan is a pale dude, though. "Seven and Eight!"

Eddie wasn't interested in movies. Eddie was interested in second looks, glances back. It wasn't like the guy ever pursued any of these leads. Dude had a girlfriend. And half the time I think he was throwing in extra numbers just to needle me, because he knew I didn't get too many looks. One time I was like "Hey Eddie, that girl was just staring at me" and he said well, you know, it could be because you're goofy looking. Eddie was a nice guy like that. But I think a lot now about how Eddie used to be, because he was interested in interest. Hesitant, furitive, sidelong, up and down second looks.

I realize now that this is mostly kid's stuff. Kids are always checking each other out. The older you get, the more the blinders go on. You mostly keep to yourself in the hopes that you will be bothered less as a result. It's too bad, the way folks become bored with a world around them. So it goes.

But I like to think about Eddie and his second looks. Because I like to take second looks myself. Deep inhale, long gazes back at a something. These days it is usually wine. After all, I now have a girlfriend myself. I leave the flirty eyes bit to other dudes. Mostly I gaze back over wines. It is amazing how little we really have to say about the wines that we have enjoyed. Sometimes I think we don't know them at all, that we have only our own interest as an explanation of their merit. The why or what for of them is usually a mystery. It is like somebody said of geniuses: their uncles and neighbors know nothing about them. Promixity alone doesn't bring an understanding of subjects like terroir or vine biology, or fermentation equations.

Flaws I know. Cooked, corked, oversulphured, overoaked. If it makes different wines taste the same, then I can pick it out and tell you the trouble. Because that is what a flaw is: it makes individual wines taste the same, it chases away, covers up, renders mute and makes shy the difference. Shadows on a dark pavement.

But a great wine, an articulate wine, a layered wine: well, I don't have too much to say about it. Why try to talk over it anyway? But I do love to have a look. A sniff, an inhale, a tight swirl and tilt. I love to examine what we have here, something special. And I look to go back and think about it in new ways.

Going back is key. Taking a second look, and listening to the wine, instead of the talk. I sell a lot of wines from Italy. Each time we open a bottle of something we serve by the glass, somebody on the staff tastes it, and makes sure it isn't corked before it goes out on the floor. A lot of times that person is me. Do you know how much an Italian white wine from the Campania changes over the course of 6 months? 9 months? A lot. Usually that wine is drinking at its best right about the time it is sold out from the distributor. About 9 months in to the country. That is when the layers are there, when the precision has started to show, when the texture starts to curve. Those are the good times.

Labels lie. They make you think you are tasting what you tasted before. Maybe. Usually not. There is difference. Often I think labels should say 2008 Producer's Greco di Tufo -1. -1. And then -2, and -3. Because it isn't the same bottle, and there should be some small notation to remind you of that. The message inside will be different today, the live show without the recording. But we do what we can to take another look, and to understand, and we assume change from a starting point. We create our own thread.

Mostly I'm startled by how little I know about wine. Really not much at all. But I see chances to engage with what has been wrought, and I find myself returning to favorites like old friends. What will happen on this day with this bottle? I like to take a second look. Three. Four.
 
Fucking brilliant. You have no fucking right to write something so brilliant.

This joint was described to me just yesterday as having a "preponderence of hipster ITBers that often get tired of the wine focus and enjoy flexing their intellects." A more convincing rejoinder is hard to imagine. Intellects flex because they are, appreciate fine things because they're there. Natural like breathing, no ennui required.

Yawn.
 
originally posted by SFJoe:
Do we really have that many ITB folks? Doesn't seem that way from here.
That's what I was wondering.

Oh, and very nice read Levi. I'll be curious to hear the observations that your new job will bring.
 
You have a nice turn of phrase, Levi, thank you.

If I end up buying a few bottles of a given wine these days, half the long-term interest is in learning how the wines have developed, half in how my tastes and sensitivities have. A bit like re-reading a favored books after a couple of years.
 
Joe, you are secretly the only one who's not ITB. Why do you think Coad was silenced? All of that non-ITB nonsense.

But don't tell VLM I told you.

ETA: For all those of you who haven't received my 27.3% off Big Discount Hipster Unsulfured Whine Catalog, please e-mail.
 
originally posted by SFJoe:
Do we really have that many ITB folks? Doesn't seem that way from here.

I don't think that we have that many trust fund babies either, but I can recall our being labeled with that tag, too, in the not-so-distant past.

And what's up with all this hipster hate, anyway? Most of us are too young for the original definition and too old for the PoMo meaning, apart from Slaton, that is. Then there's the more basic problem of attitude.

Mark Lipton
 
It is like somebody said of geniuses: their uncles and neighbors know nothing about them...

Or doctors who sexually abuse their young patients or biology professors who shoot their colleagues...yep, a whole bunch of things nobody knew anything about.
 
originally posted by Jeff Grossman:
Big living spaces with almost no furniture, no pictures, no fabrics, and often no windows. What are they thinking?

Yeah, most of them are from a magazine called Dwell, which apparently prints them in earnestness. Snarky captions supplied by Unhappy Hipsters.
 
originally posted by MarkS:
or biology professors who shoot their colleagues...

Oh, I think somebody heard.

Though the best quote was in a New York Times article just after it happened. They talked to a student there, and he said, "Now that we realize that it was a faculty person that committed the crime, no students were injured and no students were targeted or anything like that, theres more shock than there is fear.

As a friend of mine put it, "Well, as long as they're only shooting professors..."
 
originally posted by Sharon Bowman:
originally posted by MarkS:
or biology professors who shoot their colleagues...

Oh, I think somebody heard.

Though the best quote was in a New York Times article just after it happened. They talked to a student there, and he said, "Now that we realize that it was a faculty person that committed the crime, no students were injured and no students were targeted or anything like that, theres more shock than there is fear.

As a friend of mine put it, "Well, as long as they're only shooting professors..."

This story is a warning to all faculty never to serve on committees of tenure and promotion, or if so serving, to vote only in favor of granting tenure. Alternatively, if serving on a hiring committee, never hire someone with a Harvard degree.
 
originally posted by Jonathan Loesberg:

This story is a warning to all faculty never to serve on committees of tenure and promotion, or if so serving, to vote only in favor of granting tenure. Alternatively, if serving on a hiring committee, never hire someone with a Harvard degree.

I question the long-term survival of the tenure system as we know it. Between awful incidents like this one and the growing problem of keeping outside letters of evaluation confidential, I cannot see how we can continue to operate. I know of several departments that have had to dispense with letters from external evaluators because their University lawyers had declared that they couldn't assure the letter writers that their letters would be kept confidential. The upshot was that the letters were so namby-pamby in their critiques that they were no longer of any real use.

Sad, sad,
Mark Lipton
 
Back
Top