Here is the full coverage from both the orderly and Disorderly, including everything Cory included in his post.
Mostly, the wines have been a horror show. Some exceptions, of course, and yesterday's Monferrato focus was definitively better than anything before or since. Too much/syrupy/fake-tasting fruit and overly aggressive tannin are, for me, as much of a problem than the wine-obliterating wood, but of course the tannin issue does partially follow from the wood. A lot of wines are surprisingly low-acid for barbera, which is just a travesty.
Cory's right that they're not giving us any time to blog in more than summary form, which is odd since it's why we're here...but then, it
is a junket, so they can schedule it as they like, I suppose.
But if the wines have been the lowlights, the arguments have been the highlights. Some real aggression and hostility from the winemakers. And alternatively, a lot of very confused ideology.
Also, I don't recommend any producer self-identified as "natural" or lovers of said wines attempt to defend the word or any technique that might be used (or not used) if they're here. "Stupid," "idiotic," and "insane" have been applied maybe a dozen times to various concepts.
And there's some bewildering dialogue aside from that. The no-sulfite guy micro-oxidizes the results, for example, while claiming that he can't micro-oxidize his other barbera (to which 20% dried grape wine has been added "for the reduction of tannins") because "no one has any idea what micro-oxidation does to polyphenols." And yet he uses it on the no-sulfur wine.
I just don't know.