Obey ye the rule of fifteen!

  • Thread starter Thread starter BJ
  • Start date Start date

BJ

BJ
Every eighteen months or so, we open a bottle of 95 Chave Offerus. Year in, year out, we say something like:

"Gee, this is nice, but it is pretty structured and tight. I wonder if it'll come around at some point. Seems like it's drying."

and then friends we have it with say, "Gee it seems like it might be over the hill."

The rule of fifteen years.

Tonight we do our regular opening. A different deal. Lush, meaty, salty, nice acids, floral, gardenias. Relaxed. Special. Secondaries transitioned to early tasty tertiaries.

Remember, ye people, the rule of fifteen, with regards to good Northern Rhones.
 
I think maybe Chapoutier 1992 Cote Rotie peaked in 2000. Or maybe it was just local midwestern stocks that did. Is there a standard derivation?
 
originally posted by Putnam Weekley:
I think maybe Chapoutier 1992 Cote Rotie peaked in 2000. Or maybe it was just local midwestern stocks that did. Is there a standard derivation?

He said good northern Rhones.
 
originally posted by Jay Miller:
originally posted by Putnam Weekley:
I think maybe Chapoutier 1992 Cote Rotie peaked in 2000. Or maybe it was just local midwestern stocks that did. Is there a standard derivation?

He said good northern Rhones.

ba da ta!
 
originally posted by BJ:
originally posted by Marc D:
JLL recommends 15 years for St J and CH?

Heck yeah, check it out!

I drank the '98 Chave estate St Joseph two weeks ago, and it seemed like it was drinking perfectly and maybe at peak. More advanced and less tight than the bottle we shared a year ago.
 
originally posted by Putnam Weekley:
I think maybe Chapoutier 1992 Cote Rotie peaked in 2000. Or maybe it was just local midwestern stocks that did. Is there a standard derivation?

The proof is a little complicated, involving some category theory as it does, but I'm sure Brad would be happy to post it on request.
 
Back
Top