originally posted by Claude Kolm:
originally posted by Ned Hoey:
originally posted by Claude Kolm:
most, but not all, producers who switch to biodynamie really do get an improvement in their wine.
But switch from what? Conventional farming? Lutte raisone? Sustainable? Lowly generic 'organic'?
Organic farmers can not follow the Steiner program but still follow lunar phases. While organic is not a narrowly defined term and BD is, I think it's wrong for so many to automatically assume that BD is
the highest form of organic.
Claude, I acknowledge that you're just the messenger and my questions aren't directed at you. I pose them generally.
Ned -- Obviously the greatest difference one sees in the conversion from conventional farming.
Aubert de Villaine ran experiments at Domaine de la Romane-Conti for many years comparing organic and biodynamic and said that he saw little difference. The estate has now converted fully to biodynamic; Aubert told me that it was because it was more expensive to run a split operation than an entirely biodynamic one not because he believed in the superiority of biodynamie, although others have reported that he was convinced by its superiority.
Some others who have been organic for a long time and converted to biodynamie, such as Clemens Busch, have also told me that they saw little difference and that they are convinced that the major change is from conventional farming to organic, whether biodynamic or not.