Claude Kolm
Claude Kolm
Jeux de mots jets mous.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Recent lessons
- Thread starter VLM
- Start date
You say that now. Join us. Let's test that theory.I would love to attend anything paid for by anybody at which there was wine given to me for free.
My grammatical world is all turvy-topsy.I don't necessarily, however, try to get there wine imported.
Joe Dressner
Joe Dressner
originally posted by Thor:
Certainly he accepts gratuitous quantities of free grenache (it would be fine if it was poulsard, but grenache...), and also French translations of German philosophers' texts, and to then turn around and say negative things about the wines on the internet is just gosh-darn rude. On the other hand, to say negative things about the philosophers is an ethical gray area.
Thor:
People always offer us samples of wines we know we won't like. Free wine.
I tell them not to send them.
Not because it would be impolite to accept free wines and then not like them or perhaps write about about them on my blog or here.
But because it would be infantile and boorish.
Joe
Tom Glasgow
Thomas W Glasgow
I thought this was the place for infantilism and boorishness. But seriously why no love for the Talking Heads on this board?originally posted by Joe Dressner:
originally posted by Thor:
Certainly he accepts gratuitous quantities of free grenache (it would be fine if it was poulsard, but grenache...), and also French translations of German philosophers' texts, and to then turn around and say negative things about the wines on the internet is just gosh-darn rude. On the other hand, to say negative things about the philosophers is an ethical gray area.
Thor:
People always offer us samples of wines we know we won't like. Free wine.
I tell them not to send them.
Not because it would be impolite to accept free wines and then not like them or perhaps write about about them on my blog or here.
But because it would be infantile and boorish.
Joe
Kevin Roberts
Kevin Roberts
originally posted by Tom Glasgow:
This must be the place.I thought this was the place for infantilism and boorishness. But seriously why no love for the Talking Heads on this board?originally posted by Joe Dressner:
originally posted by Thor:
Certainly he accepts gratuitous quantities of free grenache (it would be fine if it was poulsard, but grenache...), and also French translations of German philosophers' texts, and to then turn around and say negative things about the wines on the internet is just gosh-darn rude. On the other hand, to say negative things about the philosophers is an ethical gray area.
Thor:
People always offer us samples of wines we know we won't like. Free wine.
I tell them not to send them.
Not because it would be impolite to accept free wines and then not like them or perhaps write about about them on my blog or here.
But because it would be infantile and boorish.
Joe
I'll send some Talking Heads love.
The name of the band is Talking Heads...
Cheers,
Kevin
originally posted by Tom Glasgow:
I thought this was the place for infantilism and boorishness. But seriously why no love for the Talking Heads on this board?
Infantilism, perhaps, but boorishness, never. And how did we veer into Talking Heads territory? I'll profess some love, even unto my love for "King's Lead Hat." (it will come, it will come, it will surely come)
Mark Lipton
Tom Glasgow
Thomas W Glasgow
You allege that no one has posted here while intoxicated? See http://winedisorder.com/comment/56/3295/ for the safe harbor area.originally posted by MLipton:
originally posted by Tom Glasgow:
I thought this was the place for infantilism and boorishness. But seriously why no love for the Talking Heads on this board?
Infantilism, perhaps, but boorishness, never. And how did we veer into Talking Heads territory? I'll profess some love, even unto my love for "King's Lead Hat." (it will come, it will come, it will surely come)
Mark Lipton
Jonathan Loesberg
Jonathan Loesberg
originally posted by Thor:
You say that now. Join us. Let's test that theory.I would love to attend anything paid for by anybody at which there was wine given to me for free.
My grammatical world is all turvy-topsy.I don't necessarily, however, try to get there wine imported.
Actually, it's your orthographic world.
Christian Miller (CMM)
Christian Miller
originally posted by MLipton:
originally posted by Tom Glasgow:
I thought this was the place for infantilism and boorishness. But seriously why no love for the Talking Heads on this board?
Infantilism, perhaps, but boorishness, never. And how did we veer into Talking Heads territory? I'll profess some love, even unto my love for "King's Lead Hat." (it will come, it will come, it will surely come)
Mark Lipton
Much much love for the tour that followed Remain in Light.
It's not, because of the turvying. The topsying would agree with you.Actually, it's your orthographic world.
originally posted by Christian Miller (CMM):
originally posted by MLipton:
originally posted by Tom Glasgow:
I thought this was the place for infantilism and boorishness. But seriously why no love for the Talking Heads on this board?
Infantilism, perhaps, but boorishness, never. And how did we veer into Talking Heads territory? I'll profess some love, even unto my love for "King's Lead Hat." (it will come, it will come, it will surely come)
Mark Lipton
Much much love for the tour that followed Remain in Light.
And Talking Heads '77 tour, also.
Jeff Grossman
Jeff Grossman
Why A Big Suit?
originally posted by Bwood:
originally posted by Christian Miller (CMM):
Much much love for the tour that followed Remain in Light.
And Talking Heads '77 tour, also.
I saw them on both tours and the change was astounding. On the '77 tour, David Byrne looked ready to die from stage fright and the instrumental skills of the rhythm section were questionable at best. By the Remain in Light/Stop Making Sense tour, they not only were far better stage performers and musicians but they'd assembled some quality studio musicians (like Bernie Worrell) to turn their sparse '77 sound into a funk-infused New Wave act. Had the band name not given it away, it might have otherwise been difficult to associate the band of the '83 tour with that of the '78 tour. Both concerts were damn fun, though.
Mark Lipton
originally posted by MLipton:
originally posted by Bwood:
originally posted by Christian Miller (CMM):
Much much love for the tour that followed Remain in Light.
And Talking Heads '77 tour, also.
I saw them on both tours and the change was astounding. On the '77 tour, David Byrne looked ready to die from stage fright and the instrumental skills of the rhythm section were questionable at best. By the Remain in Light/Stop Making Sense tour, they not only were far better stage performers and musicians but they'd assembled some quality studio musicians (like Bernie Worrell) to turn their sparse '77 sound into a funk-infused New Wave act. Had the band name not given it away, it might have otherwise been difficult to associate the band of the '83 tour with that of the '78 tour. Both concerts were damn fun, though.
Mark Lipton
Agree. The transformation from TH '77 to Remain in Light is remarkable. Although I still enjoy both.
Have you listened to the new David Byrne CD yet?