originally posted by SFJoe:
Neither transaction was so recent.
originally posted by Yixin:
So what happened? When did the Furmint get pulled out, and why? I guess it wasn't phylloxera?
originally posted by SFJoe:
Szepsy was a co-owner of Kiralyudvar in Tokaj with Tony, but I think Tony has bought him out, and he is definitely no longer involved in the winemaking. I had never heard that he was invested in Huet. It would seem implausible that a Hungarian vigneron would have accumulated enough forints by the mid-'90s to be making hard currency investments, just thinking about it.
??originally posted by MLipton:
He did also speculate that it was Szepsy's lingering hostility toward Communism that eroded his relationship with Tony Hwang and led to their eventual falling-out at Kiralyudvar.
originally posted by SFJoe:
??originally posted by MLipton:
He did also speculate that it was Szepsy's lingering hostility toward Communism that eroded his relationship with Tony Hwang and led to their eventual falling-out at Kiralyudvar.
What you take with one hand, you give with the other.
originally posted by Scott Kraft:
Hold on - I thought Tony Hwang was Taiwanese (not Chinese) and a banker. Not exactly pre-conditioned to be pro-Communist. I don't get it.
I hate to torture you with this, but once again we have discrepant understandings. Szepsy was replaced by Zoltan Demeter, who is still winemaker there AFAIK, and a very competent guy he seems to be. Pinguet consults, and visits during the year, but it would be asking a lot for him to be the actual winemaker at two estates that are pretty much a full day's travel apart in each direction and that could have overlapping harvests.originally posted by MLipton:
originally posted by SFJoe:
??originally posted by MLipton:
He did also speculate that it was Szepsy's lingering hostility toward Communism that eroded his relationship with Tony Hwang and led to their eventual falling-out at Kiralyudvar.
What you take with one hand, you give with the other.
Szepsy was forced out as winemaker at Kiralyudvar and replaced by Pinguet. That much you knew, no?
Has anyone considered that Szepsy's alledged behavior (his not being aboveboard) may have been the result of living under the Hungarian communist regime? With communism having nothing to do with Hwang?originally posted by SFJoe:
I hate to torture you with this, but once again we have discrepant understandings. Szepsy was replaced by Zoltan Demeter, who is still winemaker there AFAIK, and a very competent guy he seems to be. Pinguet consults, and visits during the year, but it would be asking a lot for him to be the actual winemaker at two estates that are pretty much a full day's travel apart in each direction and that could have overlapping harvests.originally posted by MLipton:
originally posted by SFJoe:
??originally posted by MLipton:
He did also speculate that it was Szepsy's lingering hostility toward Communism that eroded his relationship with Tony Hwang and led to their eventual falling-out at Kiralyudvar.
What you take with one hand, you give with the other.
Szepsy was forced out as winemaker at Kiralyudvar and replaced by Pinguet. That much you knew, no?
I'll pass over the Communism thing because I don't get it at all. Tony has never seemed very Bolshie to me. And I suspect it's hard to find Hungarians without resentment at the old regime, but there I speak from almost pure conjecture.
Anyhow, there you are.
When I visited Budapest last fall, one of the owners of the B&B had grown up and worked under Communism. (In fact, he was a performer and toured outside of Hungary... which made his Overlords all the more strict and watchful.)originally posted by Tom Glasgow:
Has anyone considered that Szepsy's alledged behavior (his not being aboveboard) may have been the result of living under the Hungarian communist regime?
originally posted by Tom Glasgow:
Has anyone considered that Szepsy's alledged behavior (his not being aboveboard) may have been the result of living under the Hungarian communist regime? With communism having nothing to do with Hwang?
Pure speculation on my part for certain, thus my title.originally posted by SFJoe:
originally posted by Tom Glasgow:
Has anyone considered that Szepsy's alledged behavior (his not being aboveboard) may have been the result of living under the Hungarian communist regime? With communism having nothing to do with Hwang?
Ummmm, no. This would seem to be compounding a series of hypotheticals in parallel to the actual events with actual people and their real motivations, about which we seem to know rather little. I'd rather stay out of it, myself.