originally posted by Nicolas Mestre:
originally posted by Lyle Fass:
Been called a lot of things but Fox News is great. Jesus and Fox News in the same thread. You'd think I was carrying a bible around Scottsdale driving in my pickup truck asking brown-looking people for their immigration papers? By the time I get to Arizona . . . .
What Mr. Mestre seems to be saying is he likes what he likes. No surprise there as this is a wine board where people give their opinions on wines. Isn't that how this thread was started? As my opinion might be new to him, it is possibly viewed as threat, which is just human nature. I don't fret over these things anymore. Call it the brave new wine board Lyle. So I'm not going to even bother to defend my own opinions. I've tasted X amount of '08 Beaujolais. More have not been good rather than good. There seems to be a lightness to them I don't find appealing, plus many show alcohol, grit in the middle and the end, and don't seem to have the balance I look for in Beaujolais and wine in general.
There is really not much to taste in Beaujolais to asess a vintage anyway as most people nuke their vineyards and then when the wine is limping around blindly, they finish it off with a sawed-off shotgun to the face in the cellar. There is what, 20 guys that we all give a shit about? Am I being too kind? Producer is important, I agree, but sometimes vintage character does dominate. 2003 Beaujolais is a great example. And for me, I think 2008 is similar in that there is a vintage stamp to the wines.
Lyle, no need for such formality. Call me nicolas.
It appears that you haven't quite gotten the gist of my criticism, which wasn't directed at your aesthetic sensibilities at all. I don't give a shit whether or not you like Foillard.
My qualm is with statements like: "Seems pretty terrible at the low end." in reference to the 2008 vintage in Burgundy.
I take issue with this because you assume that the people reading this post are complicit with however you have decided to define the word "terrible" as it applies to a given wine region in relation to your impressions of the wines you have tasted. But as you have seen with the ensuing dialog regarding the 2008 Foillard CDP, each person's notion of "terrible" or "good" or what constitutes a "flaw" or whatever is not uniform.
Reducing a vintage to a single descriptive word is irresponsible. That is what I take issue with.