originally posted by lars makie:
originally posted by Lyle Fass:
TN: 2005 Overnoy-Houillon PupillinThis is a wine I adore. The nose was fascinating and had all types of non-fruit aromas. Decaying, foresty, some red fruits and some dead/dying flowers on the nose. There was great focus to the aromas and they wafted. The palate on the other hand, was a different story. It seemed like it was fading. The fruit was short, and the finish was short and astringent. Really not a good showing. Apparently the winery held it back and it was just released. Someone else commented that last bottle they had of this (two weeks before) had more of a structure and seemed more alive, but also added it gave the impression of a closed wine. Obviously there is some bottle variation going on here, but this bottle seemed like it would have been better two years ago. Does anybody have experience aging this wine?
Happened to have a bottle of this last night. I agree, for the most part, with what you're saying. The nose, which was lively and forthcoming, gave no indication that the palate would be nearly non-existent; just fell off a cliff. This was how it showed just after opening. I went back to try another taste about an hour or so later and it seemed to have bulked up a touch and gotten a bit deeper in that time. Not a lot mind you, but more so than it showed at first. So, with that, I'm going with SFJoe and holding mine for a just little while. But, what do I know. The only other Overnoy I've had was the '08 red which was markedly better than the '05. I'd definitely keep some of those for a while. Cory, did you try the '08? Was the '09 that much better?