Saina Nieminen
Saina Nieminen
Vincent Gaudry Sancerre La Tournebride 2008
I am usually indifferent to Sauvignon Blanc: it is a boring grape and even the best wines very rarely transcend its inherent limitations. Yet I have had a handful of examples that made me sniff the glass again and again. This is one of the few.
It has all those typical, pleasantly greenish aromas mixed with citrus and mineral that are expected; but there is a depth to it that I have rarely seen in this grape. It is complex - and this is a word I have hardly ever used with this grape.
But the marvel of this wine isn't its unusually complex nose, but the palate. It starts out rich - more so than I expected from this year - but an almost tannic sensation ensues that really perks up the mid-palate. After this initial richness, the end becomes more and more elegant and mineral and citric. But it is wrong to call it the end or finish, because it doesn't.
It is surely ok to say positive things about a small, "real wine" producer like Gaudry, but just to publicly humiliate myself I have write about another Sancerre that I recently tried and liked.
Henri Bourgeois (shall I stop here already?) Sancerre Le MD de Bourgeois 2008 where the MD stands for Les Monts Damns.
The other Bourgeois I have had have seemed like NZ Sauvignons with their mix of over- and under-ripe aromatics. This seemed to me mineral, ripe but not tropical, delightfully grassy; crisp, greenish (smells like peas to me) but still full bodied for Loire SB - yet it manages to still be moreish. Like the Gaudry, it seems to me almost tannic with its grippy structure. I liked it.
But I do admit that generally I still dislike this grape (even in the Loire) and that my positive experiences with these two might simply be due to inexperience.
I am usually indifferent to Sauvignon Blanc: it is a boring grape and even the best wines very rarely transcend its inherent limitations. Yet I have had a handful of examples that made me sniff the glass again and again. This is one of the few.
It has all those typical, pleasantly greenish aromas mixed with citrus and mineral that are expected; but there is a depth to it that I have rarely seen in this grape. It is complex - and this is a word I have hardly ever used with this grape.
But the marvel of this wine isn't its unusually complex nose, but the palate. It starts out rich - more so than I expected from this year - but an almost tannic sensation ensues that really perks up the mid-palate. After this initial richness, the end becomes more and more elegant and mineral and citric. But it is wrong to call it the end or finish, because it doesn't.
It is surely ok to say positive things about a small, "real wine" producer like Gaudry, but just to publicly humiliate myself I have write about another Sancerre that I recently tried and liked.
Henri Bourgeois (shall I stop here already?) Sancerre Le MD de Bourgeois 2008 where the MD stands for Les Monts Damns.
The other Bourgeois I have had have seemed like NZ Sauvignons with their mix of over- and under-ripe aromatics. This seemed to me mineral, ripe but not tropical, delightfully grassy; crisp, greenish (smells like peas to me) but still full bodied for Loire SB - yet it manages to still be moreish. Like the Gaudry, it seems to me almost tannic with its grippy structure. I liked it.
But I do admit that generally I still dislike this grape (even in the Loire) and that my positive experiences with these two might simply be due to inexperience.