Foothill

Thor

Thor Iverson
Romano Levi Grappa (Piedmont) A little girl label on this one. I think most would call this fruity, but Im not sure thats itthe fruit is somewhat impressionistic, or perhaps even abstract. Not cubist. It roils with tactile complexity, as much textural as aromatic, and despite the typically cauldronesque warmth of grappa, theres so much to both the texture and the aromatics that the heat goes almost unnoticed. Until later, at least. Definitely on the richer, more luxuriant side of Levi grappas, yet whats most surprising is that this isnt expressed alongside concomitant gravity, but instead with delicious weightlessness. Succulent and, reviewed in summary, majestic. (5/10)

Le Piane 1984 Boca (Piedmont) Clinging. Sharp acidity and dusty, brown, eroded roses with alpine minerality and thin shafts of bone sticking out everywhere. This was probably better a little while ago, but theres still quite a bit of life to it. Its just a creaky, arthritic life. (6/10)

Produttori del Barbaresco 1996 Barbaresco Pora Riserva (Piedmont) A recent purchase. Citrus, chalky tannins, gravel soup, and old woods harboring a memory of animal inhabitants long passed. (Not old wood. Old woods. Like an elderly forest.) A little worse for its wear. Intact bottles could be better, and if so perhaps not yet ready. (5/10)

Vajra 2006 Langhe Rosso (Piedmont) Very pretty. Crushed, partially dried old roses, dark and a little dusty, but still pure. Soft earth. Gorgeous texture. And all for an absurdly low price. Hard to beat, really. (5/10)

Ascheri 2005 do ut des il Gusto della Solicariet Verduno Pelaverga (Piedmont) Fruit with a bite, partially due to acidity but also thanks to an angular pink-purple sharpness all its own. Plum, raspberry, and razor blade. Very interesting. (5/10)

Ferrando Erbaluce di Caluso Cuve del Fondatore (Piedmont) Sparklingand yes, thats really how they print the accent on the label. Dark-fruited for a white sparkler, with the expected herbs. Bitter, fierce, and wild. Not easy to likebut nonetheless, I do, very much. I think. (5/10)

Bellotti Cascina degli Ulivi 2006 Monferrato Bianco Montemarino (Piedmont) Semi-oxidative and deliciously so, bringing wax, rinds, peels, and light green herbs together in a heady-yet-light broth. (5/10)

Roagna 2005 Dolcetto dAlba (Piedmont) Starts off difficult and overstructured, though of course this is a very early moment to be drinking such a wine. A lot of air andwell, the tannin doesnt subside, but the acidity shows a little brighter, and the dark, chewy fruit lumbers into the background. This is by any measure a heavy, muscular wine, and it will require a fair number of years to peel away the layers of difficulty. (6/10)

Cappellano 2005 Dolcetto dAlba Gabutti (Piedmont) Where do I start with the flaws? Ill need extra ink. I dont know if the problem is with the wine, the shipment, or just this bottle. But pretty much everything except refermentation and TCA that could go wrong with this wine, has gone wrong. Yuck. (6/10)
 
originally posted by Thor:
Produttori del Barbaresco 1996 Barbaresco Pora Riserva (Piedmont)
I am drinking the 2008 Langhe Nebbiolo now. Lightweight, crisp but not too sharply acidic, bitter cherries and maybe a rose or two, no blatant earth or minerals. Great QPR. So easy to drink. $23. (I'm on the road for work and it's always a pleasure to know that there's a great geeky little store near the hotel and a bottle of nebbiolo waiting for me in the room fridge.)
 
Vajra 2006 Langhe Rosso (Piedmont) Very pretty. Crushed, partially dried old roses, dark and a little dusty, but still pure. Soft earth. Gorgeous texture. And all for an absurdly low price. Hard to beat, really. (5/10)

You must try their Albe if you haven't already. 7 minutes of heaven.
 
originally posted by MarkS:
Vajra 2006 Langhe Rosso (Piedmont) Very pretty. Crushed, partially dried old roses, dark and a little dusty, but still pure. Soft earth. Gorgeous texture. And all for an absurdly low price. Hard to beat, really. (5/10)

You must try their Albe if you haven't already. 7 minutes of heaven.

I have had some pretty crazy VA problems on the Langhe.
 
I am drinking M di Gresy 2008 Langhe "Martinenga" now. A bit "lifted" nose -- by which I mean, just a hint of the smell of vinyl and maybe even a whiff of chlorine -- and altogether tarter, leaner than the Produttori. Might work better with food than as a night-time sipping wine.
 
originally posted by Thor:

Produttori del Barbaresco 1996 Barbaresco Pora Riserva (Piedmont) A recent purchase. Citrus, chalky tannins, gravel soup, and old woods harboring a memory of animal inhabitants long passed. (Not old wood. Old woods. Like an elderly forest.) A little worse for its wear. Intact bottles could be better, and if so perhaps not yet ready. (5/10)

'96 Produttori Monte Stefano Riserva at Oliveto in Oakland (and hence, i think direct from the Produttori library) on this past Sunday night was in beautiful shape: cool and dense, with wonderful mix of dried flowers and dense dark wild blueberry-like fruit; just a hint of tar and clean earth to bind it all together. Seemed to me that it was continuing to improve as the decanter emptied (prob no more than 1.5 hours). Lovely to drink now, but if I owned any -- and I don't -- I wouldn't be in a hurry to open them.
 
As I noted: a recent purchase, and so provenance unknown. I'd say your result is much more likely to be representative...vineyard differences aside.
 
originally posted by Thor:
As I noted: a recent purchase, and so provenance unknown. I'd say your result is much more likely to be representative...vineyard differences aside.

Understood, and, although probably not as well phrased in the post as it should have been, that was the main point that I was supporting: variation due to poor (or good) storage is likely to be more significant than vineyard terroir.
 
Back
Top