Recent notes

Florida Jim

Florida Jim
2008 Dom. Chiroulet, Cotes de Gascogne Cuvee Classique:
Merlot, cabernet sauvignon, tannat and cab. franc; the tannat is clearly discernible on the nose and palate but its normal tannic load is softened by the blend, medium weight, juicy, some complexity, concentrated, satiny and lightly drying on the finish. By itself, I thought it interesting, with burgers, stellar. A wine made to be enjoyed with red meat or its equivalent. And enjoyable it was. Thanks Brad.

2006 Drystack Cellars, Sauvignon Blanc Maries Block:
Fruit filled, low acid (feeling) and medium bodied SB; no relation to New Zealand types, this is all about the fruit; its luscious and broad in the mouth. Something different but very good.

2005 Luneau-Papin, Muscadet Clos des Allees:
Crisp aromas with white fruit, bleach and sea-shore; much the same in the mouth but with a texture that belies its AOC - round but bright, soft but focused - really, my epitome of Muscadet. Lovely wine with or without food and showing well now.

1997 Mt. Veeder, Cabernet Sauvignon:
Dark fruit, green bell pepper, some spice; thick and rich in the mouth, concentrated, flavors follow the nose, grippy tannins. No real development here but a fair version of mountain cab. Others found it more earthy than I.

2004 Filippo Gallino, Roero Superiore:
Good, rustic nebbiolo; varietal character, nothing overdone, grippy tannins and a good food wine - if you want Barbaresco, pay more - this is just a solid, very drinkable nebbiolo for $18.

2007 D. Ventura, Ribeira Sacra Vina do Burato:
Cesspool nose and not much better on the palate - there may be something redeeming here but Im not sticking around for it. Awful stuff - DNPIM. Tried twice, same deal.

2005 Puffeney, Arbois Poulsard M:
A nice drink and very much like a good Overnoy poulsard but more abbreviated, rustic and less complex; no finesse here, just a solid delivery of the varietys individual character. Good, not great for $28.

2009 Schnaitmann, Evoe (Rose):
80/20 pinot and trollonger; some RS here and not to my liking; also a very slight spritz which I could do without the RS but with it makes the wine seems soda-pop-ish. 11% alcohol and about $16 - not my style.

2005 Dom. de lEcu, Muscadet Expression de Granite:
Call it power of suggestion but this wine gives the impression of being made in granite; somewhat closed but still ample depth and precision, complex, juicy and very long. A pretty stunning bottle and I suspect, only in its infancy. 12% alcohol.

1999 Lafarge, Volnay Vendages Selectionees:
Dark, tannic and brooding; bone dry, deep but the structure is dominant. I dont know if the fruit will live as long as the tannins - still, a wine with character and appeal. No doubt its Beaune, some finesse but more like a pinot from Cornas.

Best, Jim
 
originally posted by Florida Jim:
2007 D. Ventura, Ribeira Sacra Vina do Burato:
Cesspool nose and not much better on the palate - there may be something redeeming here but Im not sticking around for it. Awful stuff - DNPIM. Tried twice, same deal.

Was this flawed or just crappy wine?

2005 Dom. de lEcu, Muscadet Expression de Granite:
Call it power of suggestion but this wine gives the impression of being made in granite; somewhat closed but still ample depth and precision, complex, juicy and very long. A pretty stunning bottle and I suspect, only in its infancy. 12% alcohol.

That's great to hear. I had not-so-good experiences with 2006-7-8. When these wines are good, they are stunning.

1999 Lafarge, Volnay Vendages Selectionees:
Dark, tannic and brooding; bone dry, deep but the structure is dominant. I dont know if the fruit will live as long as the tannins - still, a wine with character and appeal. No doubt its Beaune, some finesse but more like a pinot from Cornas.

Beaune is for savages. Pinot from Cornas is aclassic. I'm going to use that.
 
Re: the Ventura; I took back the first bottle it was so bad. The second was its match.
I'm guessing it was either a bad case or that the wine is in trouble.
Best, Jim
 
I think it had to be a bad case of the D. Ventura. My experience with it was extremely positive, just a great, aromatic, refreshing drink. But, in fairness, it was several months ago.
 
2005 Puffeney, Arbois Poulsard M:
A nice drink and very much like a good Overnoy poulsard but more abbreviated, rustic and less complex; no finesse here, just a solid delivery of the varietys individual character. Good, not great for $28.

Tough judge! (Although I agree that price is a teeny tad on the high side. I think I was happier buying it closer to $22-24).

I sort of see what you're saying about it being more abbreviated and rustic in comparison to Overnoy, but I'm not sure I would say this is less 'complex' or lacking in 'finesse'.

As such, I think Thor's award-winning comment on Jura Poulsard from the other thread is relevant:

Its the nervous trembling to the fruit, the sense of air and space within the wine, the organoleptic version of a musical silence that permits and encourages such close examination

He wrote that for Tissot but it resonated with my Puffeney experiences as well. I often think of Overnoy as more electric and energetic but Puffeney as more stable yet also more textured. Difficult to put all this stuff in words.

But lucky us to have all these great wines.
 
When I was working everyday in the wine store I didn't drink as many wines as you seem to on a regular basis. Is this a backlog of notes or are your kidneys on the verge of collapse?
 
Lou,
One must remember that these are tasting notes not drinking notes.
Not that I don't enjoy a good buzz but not every night.
Best, Jim
 
originally posted by Lou Kessler:
My God ManWhen I was working everyday in the wine store I didn't drink as many wines as you seem to on a regular basis. Is this a backlog of notes or are your kidneys on the verge of collapse?
Hey on that basis Fla Jim is a teetotaler compared to the Norseman.
 
originally posted by Florida Jim:
Lou,
One must remember that these are tasting notes not drinking notes.
Not that I don't enjoy a good buzz but not every night.
Best, Jim
What the hell does that mean? You're tasting samples? How do you manage that?
Let's hear it! The truth will out.
 
Lou,
Mostly IV's.

Well, not really . . . usually, I open a bottle or two and Diane and I have a glass of each over dinner. We may try it again the following night or, occasionally, with lunch the next day.
Sometimes we drink an entire bottle over the evening and, very occasionally, two.
But we often entertain or go out to places where bringing wine is appropriate. Then we are sharing a bottle or bottles with friends and acquaintances. We also have very good neighbors and often open something for them as well as us.

Almost always, my notes are derived from having the wine over an extended period (an evening, a couple days) with food.
When that is not the case, I call them quick notes or impressions and they are generally short.

BTW, for those keeping score, I don't write anything down - its all from memory. That uses a lot of the hard-drive so if you ask me directions to your house or VLM's middle name, I'll have to go look it up. We all have our priorities; yes?

TMI?
Best, Jim
 
Back
Top