nwr - high fructose corn syrup

originally posted by VLM:

Keith is being disingenuous. He was saying exactly what you thought he was saying and thinks that "sociological observation" is a clever way out.
Wrong and wrong.

I don't look for a "way out" of *anything* I say.
 
originally posted by Vincent Fritzsche:
originally posted by Keith Levenberg:
I agree they taste different with different sweetness perceptions but I submit the difference is the result of glass bottles vs. cans, not corn syrup vs. sugar. I think you'll find if you taste Passover Coke (sugar in 2-liter plastic) it is vastly inferior to any corn-syrup Coke out of aluminum or glass. I guess to have a complete taste test one would have to include the "Christmas" Coke bottling (corn syrup Coke in glass).

That just blew my goy mind. Passover Coke? I never heard of such a thing. But I'm going to arrange a tasting of as many as I can find...at some point any way. Might be instructive. I still think the HFCS is the key. But really, who knows.
Corn isn't kosher for Passover.(*) You can also buy Passover Heinz ketchup with real sugar.

(*) According to rabbinical consensus I have never been able to discern the basis of.
 
originally posted by VLM:

My gripe with Pollan is much the same as my gripe with Diamond, namely, that they tend to make the same point repeatedly. ...

Hey, some of us would like to make just one important point.
 
originally posted by Scott Kraft:

As a fine lady at Glenn Beck's revival meeting said, we believe in Jesus Christ" & He "would oppose redistribution of wealth."

Amen.

Why am I thinking about rich men, camels & the eye of the needle?
 
originally posted by David M. Bueker:
originally posted by Scott Kraft:

As a fine lady at Glenn Beck's revival meeting said, we believe in Jesus Christ" & He "would oppose redistribution of wealth."

Amen.

Why am I thinking about rich men, camels & the eye of the needle?[/quotes]

Because camel hair coats are so expensive these day?
 
I've been pondering the one on removing the beam from your own eye before decrying the mote in someone else's. "Demonstrating membership in a superior social caste" is dicey basis for complaint from anyone who puts wine tasting notes on the web.
 
originally posted by Ian Fitzsimmons:
I've been pondering the one on removing the beam from your own eye before decrying the mote in someone else's. "Demonstrating membership in a superior social caste" is dicey basis for complaint from anyone who puts wine tasting notes on the web.

Pierre Bourdieu has written extensively (and, to me, persuasively) on the use of taste as a kind of social plumage. I, too, dislike the superior v. inferior value judgments involved, but perhaps we can agree that it would be naive to deny that it's playing in theaters everywhere. Perhaps we can rephrase it as "Demonstrating membership in a social group that, through access to money and/or education*, demonstrates that access through their consumption choices."

*the latter usually following from the former, though not necessarily
 
originally posted by Ian Fitzsimmons:
I've been pondering the one on removing the beam from your own eye before decrying the mote in someone else's. "Demonstrating membership in a superior social caste" is dicey basis for complaint from anyone who puts wine tasting notes on the web.

So true - not that it stops us.
 
originally posted by Keith Levenberg:
originally posted by VLM:

Keith is being disingenuous. He was saying exactly what you thought he was saying and thinks that "sociological observation" is a clever way out.
Wrong and wrong.

I don't look for a "way out" of *anything* I say.

My bad, you are a cruelly misunderstood genius. Thanks for tracking down these secrets for us.
 
Back
Top