Some newish Musars

Saina Nieminen

Saina Nieminen
Musar disappeared from the Finnish market some time ago, but I splurged and ordered a few bottles of recentish vintages to try. Next month, I hope I shall be able to make a slight detour from my Syrian trip, to visit Lebanon as well to get more precise bearings on the recent years of this property I usually love.

First up was an astonishingly good Hochar Pre & Fils 2003 - astonishing because the numerous "second" (or third or fourth) wines have always seemed drearily inferior to the Chteau wine - this has so far been the only Hochar P&F that has shown a clear family resemblance to the Chteau wine. It is a single vineyard wine from the village of 'An, some 10km or so south of Chtoura (where the famous Ksara winery is). IIRC, 2003 wasn't a heat-wave in the Biq'-valley, but was a bit cooler than usual. But it was also drier and sunnier than normal, and this weather maybe is the reason why this wine combines both sweetness of fruit and a general "southern", warm feel to brightness and vivacity? Lovely stuff.

The we had the Chteau Musar Blanc 2001, a blend of Marwah and Obaideh, from the last of four consecutive heatwave vintages. But maybe due to the influence of altitude - this is from some of the highest vineyards I have heard of, at c.1200m - this didn't seem like a hot year wine (unlike the '01 red I have previously had, which did show a bit too much influence from the sun). But it is a fruity wine by Musar Blanc's standards, so much so that the oxidative notes which are there have to be actively searched for! It smells wonderfully like apricots and earth; rich and full bodied despite only 12,5% abv. The acidity for the white tends to be about 4,5-5 g/l, so it is technically a low acid wine, but it is still refreshing. Unending aftertaste, of wonderfully pure, mineral and apricotty fruit. A truly wonderful wine.

And finally we opened the Chteau Musar Rouge 2002 which might just be the most exciting young Musar I have had. But since it has been a while since this wine has been available (or affordable) in Finland, there is a possibility that my emotions make this seem greater than it really is.

The year started out abnormally cool, but the end of the growing season was hot, but not so hot (or not hot long enough) that the acidity would have plummeted. It is a year with much of everything: fruit, alcohol (14%), acidity, tannins - and amazingly enough with such a combination, nuance and elegance, too. There is nothing raisiny or overripe as there was with the red 2001, yet it has the ripe, sexy, funky, savoury style of the 1991. Wonderful grip. I have previously thought of Musar's structure as more acid than tannin driven, but this has almost Nebbiolo-like palate-cleansing tannins. The wonderful acidity makes this very moreish. I always thought that having much fruit, much alcohol, much acidity and much tannin was a combination that made wine difficult to drink, but this wine proves me wrong. Lovely stuff.
 
Thanks for the notes, Otto. Considering your expertise in this area, any thoughts on the 2000 Musar? It is available locally for a very good price.
 
I assume you mean the red? It is only middling. IMO only the 1990, 1996 and 1998 for reds have been worse (but those are awesome years for the white). I wouldn't say no to a glass or six, however - but I think it might be a year where you need to both like Musar and to have some experience of it to understand what is going on.

That said, it is not in any way a funky or challenging year for Musar, so I don't think many people will find it unpleasant - I just think neophytes will find it difficult to understand why the wine provokes such extremes of emotion. If I may be a bit rude, it is the Chateauneuf-du-Pape of Musars: sweet and ripe and easy. It is a good wine. But no more. And not representative of Musar's spirit.
 
I've only tried the '97 and '99 vintages of the red, although I've had several bottles of each. I'll grab a single bottle of '00 for shits and giggles, and I'll keep on the lookout for others...
 
In my limited experience, the '99 rouge is much more brutish and animal, with one of the most crazy earth-driven noses I've ever had, as well as a huge weight on the palate. The '00 that I recently had was really delicate, almost ethereal and Burgundian...definitely a big difference.
 
John, let me know how (or if) you enjoy the '00. Come to think of it, the '00 was another great year for their white. Hmmmm. Strange correlation that whenever the red is crap the white is fucking awesome. Though as we all know, correlation doesn't necessarily imply causation (except in the case of pirates and global warming, obviously).

Morgan, strange you say the '00 was Burgundian. It seemed to have so much sunny Southernness to it that I felt it was more like a S. Rhne than anything else.
 
Thanks for posting the notes Otto. Your experience with Musar apparently greatly exceeds my own.

A few years ago I was fortunate enough to taste a vertical of maybe 6 bottles due to the generosity of some friends, though I don't recall the vintages.

I hadn't tasted any Musar in almost 20 years before that and was surprised by the amount of VA showing in some of them. Someone told me that's not unusual for Musar, but you don't seem to mention it. Have you found high amounts of VA in them - I am just talking about the reds? Would you say that was not unusual? There were a couple bottles with less it seemed to me.
 
I have found Musars lifted but not to such an extent that I would call it overly volatile. What I have found is that from the mid '90s they have become a bit cleaner in style, less rustic. I wonder if I just have high tolerance for VA since so many people mention it. Or is it something that less than ideal shipping temperatures can cause? I ask because I always sense from American notes that Musar would be funkier, dirtier and more volatile than my experiences have led me to think. And I know the Finnish importer transports and stores them well; and in Lebanon I have bought them straight from Musar so here there are no temperature issues. But is that also true for the States?
 
originally posted by Otto Nieminen:
I have found Musars lifted but not to such an extent that I would call it overly volatile. What I have found is that from the mid '90s they have become a bit cleaner in style, less rustic. I wonder if I just have high tolerance for VA since so many people mention it. Or is it something that less than ideal shipping temperatures can cause? I ask because I always sense from American notes that Musar would be funkier, dirtier and more volatile than my experiences have led me to think. And I know the Finnish importer transports and stores them well; and in Lebanon I have bought them straight from Musar so here there are no temperature issues. But is that also true for the States?

Lifted and not *overly* volatile is how I generally describe them. But there are people very sensitive to that lifted element.
 
As the board VA hypochondriac, the wonder of Musar is that sometimes they're undrinkably volatile and other times they're more or less OK (I mean in terms of the volatility; the wine can, of course, be wonderful). Sorta like late-harvest zin, except better.
 
So, wait...they used to be more dirty/rustic? That's crazy...I have no experience with this, that is to say old-old Musar.

As to the Burgundian note, Otto, it was more in terms of the size and density of the wine that I was speaking to, as well as the general earthiness. But yes, I do see what you mean about the '00s similarities to cooler vintage southern Rhone stuff. I had '08 or 06 VT Le Crau (can't remember which, but a cooler, younger vintage) recently, and there was definitely some overlap.
 
Don't worry, Otto, you are not alone. I just opened a 2002 and it is stunning. There is a surprising amount of weight and density here, but also acidity, tannin, and subtle funk. I dare say that the wine is "accessible," although it doesn't seem to be making any concessions to anyone.

Definitely one to seek out and sit on.
 
I loved the 2001 White! Didn't have to search for the oxidative side at all, but there was much more to it - a very generous wine. I hadn't thought of it, but it could have been the pirates, now that you mention it.
 
Back
Top