A little riesling horizontal

Oswaldo Costa

Oswaldo Costa
Some friends went to Germany recently and didnt bring back any wine. As punishment, I put together a tasting, featuring a 2007 from each the four main winegrowing regions, and an older auslese to crown the affair.

Rheinhessen: 2007 Gysler Weinheimer Riesling Kabinett 8.5%
Screwcap, no reduction. Lovely aromas of tangerines, white flowers, wet stones, honey, sodium bicarbonate and a whiff of kerosene. Satisfying body, light sweetness. Delicious.

Rheingau: 2007 Leitz Rdesheimer Klosterlay Kabinett 10.0%
Screwcap, no reduction. Aromatics similar to the preceding, but more muted, with lemon instead of tangerine. A little chunkier and sweeter, with a pleasant bitter finish. Very nice.

Nahe: 2007 Dnnhoff Riesling 10.0%
Natural cork. Aromas are less lively, with a little bit less of everything (and no petrol), but the mouth feel is the most satisfying so far. Thicker, denser, drier. Great harmony between nose and mouth sensations. Lovely.

Mosel-Saar-Rwer: 2007 Van Volxem Saar Riesling 12.0%
Natural cork. Even more muted white flower & mineral aromatic profile, with a smokey note of burnt sugar. This is markedly different from the three preceding wines, much drier and, paradoxically perhaps, coming off as riper. Might have shown better if placed first, but seemed a bit surly after the previous three.

1995 Joh. Jos. Prm Wehlener Sonnenuhr Auslese 7.5%
Wow aromatics of petrol, thyme, rosewater, lemon, musk and crushed mint leaves. I dont think Ive ever encountered so much chlorophyll in a wine. Perfect acid/sweet balance, the sweetness quite austere. Still a teenager, and a pleasingly ascetic one for protestant palates.

The auslese was indisputably the wine of the night, but when I asked for votes on the other four, the Gysler got four nods, the Dnnhoff two and the Van Volxem two (harrumph, I think the Leitz was much better than this suggests).

From such a limited sample, I dont think anyone learned anything, really, about how the regions differ, but the aspect I found most intriguing was how aroma was inversely proportional to alcohol, when I might have expected the opposite.
 
originally posted by Oswaldo Costa:
Mosel-Saar-Rwer: 2007 Van Volxem Saar Riesling 12.0%
Natural cork. Even more muted white flower & mineral aromatic profile, with a smokey note of burnt sugar. This is markedly different from the three preceding wines, much drier and, paradoxically perhaps, coming off as riper.
No, it's most probably riper than the others. Most of the Van Volxem wines are picked pretty late and fermented to a point of near-dryness.
 
originally posted by Oswaldo Costa:

Delicious.

Very nice.

Lovely.

i understand because i do this all the time. sometimes a single word sticks out and simply must be used to describe a certain wine. but, i'd love to have a precise system that sets out the distinctions between delicious, very nice and lovely.
 
Salil, exactly my impression. But why wait to pick riper if you're going to vinify so dry? The only consequence I saw in this one was more alcohol and stewed fruit flavors.
 
originally posted by scottreiner:
originally posted by Oswaldo Costa:

Delicious.

Very nice.

Lovely.

i understand because i do this all the time. sometimes a single word sticks out and simply must be used to describe a certain wine. but, i'd love to have a precise system that sets out the distinctions between delicious, very nice and lovely.

Only thing clear is that lovely and delicious both mean more than very nice, and may be equivalent.
 
originally posted by Oswaldo Costa:
But why wait to pick riper if you're going to vinify so dry? The only consequence I saw in this one was more alcohol and stewed fruit flavors.

This is not just a problem/issue for Volxem/German riesling. I would think that they like the more advanced flavors and weight they get from the ripeness. Although I agree it is tricky. (Of course I haven't tasted their wines since the 06 vintage and I'm sure 07 and 08 have a better chance of tasting 'balanced'.)
 
originally posted by Oswaldo Costa:
Salil, exactly my impression. But why wait to pick riper if you're going to vinify so dry? The only consequence I saw in this one was more alcohol and stewed fruit flavors.
I haven't had that particular wine, but most of the Van Volxem Rieslings I've had showed really impressive depth, aromatics and a textural richness/slight creaminess that I really liked. As far as vinifying dry: some of the bottlings from sites that lend themselves to more ripe wines (like the Goldberg and Gottesfuss) tend to show a bit more residual sugar than the entry level wines, and I've found those the most enjoyable and balanced.

Rahsaan, missed the 06 Van Volxems but really enjoyed his 08s (07s were also very good, though I only tried a few of those wines.)
 
I was at least wondering what happened to the Pfalz. Of course the Mittlerhein has falen off the map. Franken wines are not yet getting the recognition they deserve, nor are wines from Baden, though lack of availability outside Germany hurts both regions.

Now 7 or 8 vintages in for my own tasting, I still do not get van Volxem. I can admire the wines, but they never seem to attain the precision that I look for in Saar Riesling.
 
originally posted by David M. Bueker:
Of course the Mittlerhein has falen off the map.
Actually, it's currently the most exciting region in Germany. Not Roter Hang, but inland, the former trash dump, with Wittmann, K-P Keller, Groebe, Battenfeld-Spanier, Wagner-Stempel, et al.
 
originally posted by David M. Bueker:
Claude - I said Mittelrhein, not Rheinhessen (though I did not spell it correctly the first time).
Ooops. Sorry about that -- I just didn't focus.. I'm not sure Mittelrhein ever really was on the map.
 
Geez, Oswaldo, remind me to piss you off some time, so you can punish me.

We opened a '96 Prum WS AL at an offline in D.C. a couple of months ago that was nice but underwhelming. Maybe less well-stored than your '95.

Perhaps the Mittelrhein has 'falen' off to the west.
 
originally posted by scottreiner:
originally posted by Oswaldo Costa:

Delicious.

Very nice.

Lovely.

i understand because i do this all the time. sometimes a single word sticks out and simply must be used to describe a certain wine. but, i'd love to have a precise system that sets out the distinctions between delicious, very nice and lovely.

very nice indeed ?
 
Back
Top