originally posted by Levi Dalton:
And I think, however wrong I may be, that usually winemakers aren't the most wonderful at providing context for other folks' wines. That is what the writers and importers and wannabes (like myself) are good at.
But Levi, did I said a word about the wines?
Believe me or not, I 100% trust you about the quality of these wines.(You were the guy who introduce me to COS, and this means something, no?)
And I will definitely taste them as soon as I see them.
My concern is the use of naturalness
Natural Selection Theory. Live Natural Wine
or
9 eggs made to natures own specifications
though the whole process and artistic intentions are a thousand times more important to the whole thing, than the way the raw material was produced.
The aesthetic aspect is very, very interesting and inovative. But natural?
Talking about carbon footprint...
If natural now means "different" or "new" or "revolutionary" or "creative", then these wines are, and I don't need to taste them or know how and where the raw material was grown.
If natural is in the acceptance of Chauvet's words then let's go back to what he said to winemakers and vignerons through Andras Keller (Vinum Magazine) in 1985:
"Chacun doit accepter ses vins comme ils sont en ralit, et non comme il se les imagine*"
then the importance of the process and intention is soooo huge for the personality of these wines that I hardly can think of them as natural in this acceptance.
*This is my favorite definition of naturalness for wine.
A translation could be : one has to accept her/his wines as they are, not as she/he thinks they should be.
Feel free to correct this, of course.
Eric