Form-fitting Russian currency

Thor

Thor Iverson
Bouland 2009 Chiroubles (Beaujolais) Really, really, really good. In fact, you math geeks put a bar over that really. It does, however, bear marks of its birth year; the fruit tastes perfectly in-form, all rolling cherries with a hefty contribution of violet-tinged fruit, but its big. No, big isnt quite the right word. Lush? Expansive? Microbursting? Fractal? Oh, I dont know. Its a serious mouthful of simultaneously serious and unserious wine, though, with the texture of rough suede and powerful vibrancy. Ill take a foudre of this, please. (11/10)

Coudert Clos de la Roilette 2005 Fleurie (Beaujolais) The precise nature of the maturation here is a little difficult to describe. Perhaps a fist, just starting to unclench and letting a little light shine through the interstitials, is the best analogy. Its not exactly generous, but its generously fruited, and the softness that the wine had always brought to an otherwise fairly structured package has not changed; all the development has been wrought within the wines structure. There is so far from any hurry to get to this wine. (9/10)

Coudert Clos de la Roilette 2009 Fleurie (Beaujolais) I really dont like this, and the reason isnt immediately identifiable, other than the fact it doesnt taste like much aside from a very basic notion of Beaujolais. Undoubtedly not right in some fashion, and another bottle is required. (8/10)

Cheveau 2007 Beaujolais-Villages Or Rouge (Beaujolais) Cherries and apples, with the succulent tang that characterizes the more straightforward genre of Beaujolais, the most ardent fans of which are much more enraptured by the complexities of the crus these days. But theres a lot of value in these deft, well-turned short storieschief among them the incredible cut and barb they provide in counterpoint to food. (9/10)

Lapierre 2007 Morgon (Beaujolais) Always light, getting lighter. Its not quite scrawny yet, though the bones are just beginning to protrude. Im not sure this has a future thats better than its present or its past, but Ive been wrong about this wine before. (8/10)

Chermette 2009 Beaujolais Ros Les Griottes (Beaujolais) Yearning. Not quite acquiring whatever its in the mood for, though. Simple cherry analog, tarragon analog, dust analognothing really seems entirely present here. Theres no obvious sign of damage, and yet I wonder. (8/10)

Villa Ponciago 2009 Fleurie la Rserve (Beaujolais) I dont even know where to start with the name, so lets do the wine instead. Where the hell is all this mint (peppermint, mostly) coming from? And why is it in my Fleurie? Theres a little sweet violet fruit lurking way in the background, acting like it was jacked in the playground by mint bullies and left to cower behind the jungle gym until just before the next bell rings, after which it will sprint to class and hope to avoid further violence. Theres plenty of tannin, and were this wine at all pleasant, Id say its a candidate for aging. Maybe it is, maybe it isnt, but I sure dont care for how it tastes now. (11/10)
 
Something about 14% abv Beaujolais nags at the back of my mind, like a bit of dental floss caught between my back teeth. Probably just prejudice, instilled by reading Kermit Lynch too many times.
 
I've decided to stop Quixote-ing against climate, though that's obviously not the entirety of the story here, but I know what you mean.
 
Coudert Clos de la Roilette 2009 Fleurie (Beaujolais) I really dont like this...

Don't have a problem with that, more for us folks who simply LUV the wine!

...and another bottle is required.

More like case quantities, unless you really don't like Beaujolais.
 
originally posted by Thor:
More like case quantities, unless you really don't like Beaujolais.
As the note says, I don't think the bottle was intact.

SFJoe just posted that Coudert Tardive is not half the fun it was 9 months ago, so maybe the regular is not far behind. I'll be opening one as part of a Beaujolais tasting 10 days from now. Hope the southern hemisphere is kinder.
 
Although I know at least one very experienced and sophisticated taster who can't drink Coudert.

I think it's like the cilantro or the pyrazines things, or the 100 others that we haven't yet identified. Different alleles.
 
originally posted by SFJoe:
Although I know at least one very experienced and sophisticated taster who can't drink Coudert.

I think it's like the cilantro or the pyrazines things, or the 100 others that we haven't yet identified. Different alleles.
Well I hope I don't have that issue, opened the CT today and with a 5 hour decant it still seemed closed.
 
originally posted by Oswaldo Costa:
originally posted by Thor:
More like case quantities, unless you really don't like Beaujolais.
As the note says, I don't think the bottle was intact.

SFJoe just posted that Coudert Tardive is not half the fun it was 9 months ago, so maybe the regular is not far behind. I'll be opening one as part of a Beaujolais tasting 10 days from now. Hope the southern hemisphere is kinder.

I had the regular on Thanksgiving - it was very nice, but tight. The next day the remaining glass was much more open, yet still pretty shy. Thor's note above carries a date of 8/10 - doesn't sound like the bottle I just had which was clearly right yet too young.

Thor, are you sure the Panciago wasn't vinified in Napa Valley?
 
originally posted by Tom Glasgow:
opened the CT today and with a 5 hour decant it still seemed closed.
That is the consistent showing of the wine these days. There is really no reason to open one for years.

IMO, of course.
 
originally posted by SFJoe:
originally posted by Tom Glasgow:
opened the CT today and with a 5 hour decant it still seemed closed.
That is the consistent showing of the wine these days. There is really no reason to open one for years.

IMO, of course.

2005 or 2009? The answer is probably both, of course. Empire state of min and all that.
 
Well, as noted I'm in no hurry to open the rest of the 2005s. As for the 2009s, this wasn't my bottle and I do own some, but it sounds like I'd be wasting my time by opening another one to see about that previous note. So I won't. I do, as a rule, love Coudert, which is why this performance was odd.
 
Back
Top