Jeff Connell
Jeff Connell
A very interesting hunt indeed. Of course, I'm not a reasonable wine drinker, and possibly I'm a bit contrary. I thought that the standard advice for any Corbires that you like (important proviso - any reasonable wine drinker would only keep a wine they like) was "drink in its youth or age for 5 to 8 years". So eight years, nine years, close enough - it's not such a long time for a wine with the structure of a decent Corbires.originally posted by Sharon Bowman:
Aging things you're not supposed toThis weekend I had a minor Corbires from 1999, and damn if the thing wasn't beautifully smooth and unctuous. This got me to thinking that, of course, any reasonable wine drinker would not have kept a minor (I'm talking entry level whatnot from someone no one knows) wine of such an appellation for nearly ten years. Yet it was good! Better than good!
Which reminded me of a superannuated Aligot I had in Issoudun once (don't ask). Beautiful, curious wine.
I am now on the hunt for other stories of this ilk. Anyone else had great overold surprises?
It's a question of expectations. One great surprise for me was the Tondonia Ros 1988 that we had in 2002 I think it was. It was the current release at the time, and a beautiful, beguiling wine. For me it had an appeal similar to, say, Haut-Brion blanc (properly aged, of course). That was just the first time my expectations regarding ageability of a pink wine were confounded.
Another interesting example is Hanzell 1981 Chardonnay, which I also had in 2002. The first sip confirmed my expectations that California Chardonnay does not have an aptitude for aging. The wine was clearly DOA, madeirised. Except 30 minutes later, airing out in the glass, the wine came to life. It was glorious, rich, complex, golden-fruited, and long. Since then I have learned that there are indeed several California Chardonnays that age very well. It seems to depend on the combination of a good site and a winemaker who believes in the value of ageability.
I recently found a few bottles of a 1996 St.-Joseph from Perret, which I don't even remember buying. Today this pure, fruit-driven wine is clearly at maturity, but seems to be holding reasonably well.
I'm curious, though, why would Southern wines be more ageable than Northern wines? I would have thought the opposite. And when did Xinomavro and Mondeuse lose their ageability? (Their expectation of ageability, that is.) Dolcetto, a 1996 G. Conterno that blew us away in 2006 notwithstanding, still lacks that expectation. But, Keith, when I come to share your Xinomavro and Mondeuse, I will gladly be educated in Dolcetto at the same time.
And what the hell is "minor" wine, anyway?