More notes

Florida Jim

Florida Jim
2007 Le Colombier, Vacqueras Tradition:
13.5% alcohol, about $15, retail; 70% grenache, 20% syrah, 10% mourvèdre, 30 year old vines, élevage in cement; shy but clean nose of brined meat and dust, little fruit when first opened, later its all dark cherry scents; more generous in the mouth with raw meat, garrigue and wild cherry fruit; focused and firm but not tannic; medium length. With Rancho Gordo® Christmas bean soup, excellent.

2008 Erath, Pinot Noir:
13% alcohol, screwcap and about $16; translucent in appearance, transparent in delivery; smells like Oregon pinot without artifice or enhancement; tastes of clean red fruit, crisp and of its place; good sustain. Not a complex wine but as feminine and easy to drink as one could ask. With braised pork butt, excellent.

2008 Adelsheim, Pinot Noir Willamette Valley:
13.3% alcohol and about $20; much darker in both appearance and delivery than the foregoing wine, slightly sharp but otherwise a pleasant but forgettable wine. Not in the same league as the Erath.

N/V Cedric Bouchard, Champagne La Parcelle:
For Valentine’s Day; I have written glowingly about this several times previous so . . . over the course of the evening, the following stages were observed: mmmm, sigh, gush and swoon. Me, that is.

2009 Jadot, Beaujolais-Villages:
13% alcohol and about $9; firm and reticent at first but opens over 30 minutes to become a complete, fairly deep, beautifully focused Gamay with a mineral backbone and juicy fruit that the cru producers would be proud of. If there is a better $9 bottle of red on your wine store shelf, I’d love to try it. Outstanding with burgers and oven fries.

Best, Jim
 
Agree on the 09 Jadot Beaujolais-Villages, which we've been enjoying as a mid-week house red. Better the second day from an opened bottle, imho - there's a bit of sweetness in the first hours after opening that doesn't wear well.

Is it Purcelle or Parcelle?

Colombier seems to be a good source for well-priced wines from the Rhone.

Thank you.
 
The few I've tasted seemed to have good potential but always seem to have some sort of problem, like tasting a little green. Could this be success just because it's an excellent vintage?
Our selection of Oregon pinot is limited but a few places have carried Erath in the past.
 
Steve,
I don't remember ever having an Erath wine before so I can't help you with historical context.
As for this one, I will buy more (Diane also enjoyed it).
Best, Jim
 
2008 Adelsheim, Pinot Noir Willamette Valley:
13.3% alcohol and about $20; much darker in both appearance and delivery than the foregoing wine, slightly sharp but otherwise a pleasant but forgettable wine. Not in the same league as the Erath.

Perhaps closed or just having a bad day? His 2007 "regular" was very fine about 6 months ago.
 
I tried the Erath Pinot Noir 2007 tonight since the '08 sounded intriguing. Sadly, it wasn't all that interesting. Smells of PN, leans more to fruit than structure though it is a pleasantly light wine. Lacks acid: sweet and soft. Was '08 a cool year? Would there be better acidity in it?
 
originally posted by Otto Nieminen:
I tried the Erath Pinot Noir 2007 tonight since the '08 sounded intriguing. Sadly, it wasn't all that interesting. Smells of PN, leans more to fruit than structure though it is a pleasantly light wine. Lacks acid: sweet and soft. Was '08 a cool year? Would there be better acidity in it?
2008 is the year that supposedly had everything right - cool summer, warm Fall, long slow ripening giving a small crop of flavorful grapes with moderate sugars and good acid. 2007 was a rained-on vintage dismissed by the pointy-headed as dilute and unripe. I've had some thin, simple 2007s, but the better ones are delightful, positively Volnayish in elegance and length. I would imagine that a heavy crop bloated by rain might produce a low acid 2007, but the ones I've had were not lacking in acid.
 
Back
Top