Snakebit in Chicago

originally posted by Kay Bixler:
originally posted by Jay Miller:
It was a TCA infected mess./quote]

Oh well. Can we argue about the '90 Les Picasses then?

I'm really up for a good wine debate and I'm not getting anywhere with Nathan.

The 1990 Les Picasses on the other hand was clearly corked.
 
Had the '97 CFE just a few weeks ago. Some signs of pre-ox, but still showing pretty well IMO...and the wine had some developing secondary that I really liked.
 
originally posted by Kay Bixler:
originally posted by Jay Miller:
It was a TCA infected mess.

Oh well. Can we argue about the '90 Les Picasses then?

I'm really up for a good wine debate and I'm not getting anywhere with Nathan.

The 90 Picasses is clearly over the hill and musty, not merely corked.
 
originally posted by VLM:
originally posted by Kay Bixler:
originally posted by Jay Miller:
It was a TCA infected mess.

Oh well. Can we argue about the '90 Les Picasses then?

I'm really up for a good wine debate and I'm not getting anywhere with Nathan.

The 90 Picasses is clearly over the hill and musty, not merely corked.

Marc D and I shared a bottle of this a couple months ago and it was drop dead gorgeous. One of the best bottles I had all year. So, um, if you've got any I'll happily unburden you...
 
originally posted by Brian C:

Oh well. Can we argue about the '90 Les Picasses then?

I'm really up for a good wine debate and I'm not getting anywhere with Nathan.

The 90 Picasses is clearly over the hill and musty, not merely corked.

Marc D and I shared a bottle of this a couple months ago and it was drop dead gorgeous. One of the best bottles I had all year. So, um, if you've got any I'll happily unburden you...

The '89 was very good too, but not as open or friendly as the 1990 that night.
 
Back
Top