You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
TN: Chavannes, Haut Bailly, Doisy-Vedrines, Huet Petillant, Meulenhof
- Thread starter Ian Fitzsimmons
- Start date
originally posted by Keith Levenberg:
Perhaps, but if the inference is unwarranted or untrue in the specific case, then it raises doubts about whether one ought to make the inference generally.originally posted by Oswaldo Costa:
Again, the discussion about process or results oriented wine may have been triggered by a comment about the Chavannes but was not about the Chavannes at all.
No.
originally posted by Oswaldo Costa:
Ah, but it could be the exception that proves the rule (wink).
Yes.
originally posted by VLM:
originally posted by Josh Beck:
The discussion of process or results oriented wine making is pretty laughable, as others have suggested.
Why do you say that? I think it is a pretty handy distinction and a better categorization than anyone else has offered thus far.
I say that because I see conjecture and no actual information, largely.
A discussion of the winemaking philosophies and practices at Chavannes or other producers would be more interesting to me than speculation as to whether they are process or results oriented. Perhaps someone who is concerned should visit the cellar and pose them the question in those terms.
originally posted by Josh Beck:
originally posted by VLM:
originally posted by Josh Beck:
The discussion of process or results oriented wine making is pretty laughable, as others have suggested.
Why do you say that? I think it is a pretty handy distinction and a better categorization than anyone else has offered thus far.
I say that because I see conjecture and no actual information, largely.
A discussion of the winemaking philosophies and practices at Chavannes or other producers would be more interesting to me than speculation as to whether they are process or results oriented. Perhaps someone who is concerned should visit the cellar and pose them the question in those terms.
Oh, I thought you were saying that the process/results wasn't a useful distinction.
I've never had the wines and don't really care if they're good or not, I'm just defending my work.
Oswaldo Costa
Oswaldo Costa
originally posted by Josh Beck:
originally posted by VLM:
originally posted by Josh Beck:
The discussion of process or results oriented wine making is pretty laughable, as others have suggested.
Why do you say that? I think it is a pretty handy distinction and a better categorization than anyone else has offered thus far.
I say that because I see conjecture and no actual information, largely.
A discussion of the winemaking philosophies and practices at Chavannes or other producers would be more interesting to me than speculation as to whether they are process or results oriented. Perhaps someone who is concerned should visit the cellar and pose them the question in those terms.
I have objections to this riposte but am too laudatory towards anyone who has the good taste to pose questions instead of redundantly asking them, so will let the matter rest.