originally posted by Sharon Bowman:
originally posted by Oswaldo Costa:
I meant abstraction in art. Surrealism was locked in a power struggle with rival isms like De Stijl, etc.
But I was railing against the popularity of the Surrealist visual arts vs. the sooty obscurity of brilliant Surrealist literature.
Apples v. oranges, non? Visual arts engage the senses and, only isofar as we desire, the intellect. In contast, surrealist literature engages the senses only insofar as it's needed to impart the image of the print to the visual cortex and then on to the language-processing centers. Appreciation for surrealist literature almost entirely arises from our sense of language, a cognitive element. I'd posit that fewer people derive pleasure from that activity than from the playfulness of visual surrealism.
Merdre!
Mark Lipton