David M. Bueker
David M. Bueker
Check the newsletter on the website.
originally posted by Ian Fitzsimmons:
Interesting; I'd always thought Viognier-based wines were for early drinking.
originally posted by Rahsaan:
originally posted by Ian Fitzsimmons:
Interesting; I'd always thought Viognier-based wines were for early drinking.
You should know by now that there are no rules.
I had a bottle of Steve's 1992 Knight’s Valley Viognier in 2006 and it was a real delight. Sunny goodness with plenty of acidity and in no danger of falling apart. Mature but vibrant. I guess 14 years old is the magic number for these wines.
originally posted by Steve Edmunds:
I read in some famous wine critic's publication once that if you like Viognier more than one or two years old you're a certifiable necrophiliac. You can't make this stuff up!
originally posted by .sasha:
I assume it was the unoaked Jay Miller who left some 1993 Zinfandel Amador in the cellar today. Lovely, resolved stuff; I suspect I would not have liked this as much 10 years ago. A touch of "Amarone" character, sweet cranberry, very nice flow and transparency to the fruit, hints of refreshing cedary spice, very decent length.
originally posted by .sasha:
When did you smell the wine, eastern standard time? The aromas were agreeable just before 7pm.
originally posted by Mr. Doghead:
Can't find ESJ in RI.
Something about corrupt little states seems to offend, is it, Mr. E?