Was there a WLDG note purge?

originally posted by Brad Kane:
originally posted by Jonathan Loesberg:
originally posted by Jeff Grossman:
Rodney King!

Rodney King!
Click to expand...

Hear! Hear!
Click to expand...

Don't look at me. I just asked a simple question. There was no need for the response I got.
Click to expand...

Brad,

You're post as if you have been put upon to some great extent. The whole simple question bit sort of misses the point that you also received simple answers.

And not, until recently, from me. I was actually replying to Mr. Beuker and his question about why it wasn't okay to write about other boards here. But you seem to have missed that, both the fact the question was asked, and that I was replying to him.

I don't really see what your gripe is. Please stop acting like you have been wronged in some way.

I'm aware of my place. Thank you.
 
originally posted by Levi Dalton:
I was actually replying to Mr. Beuker and his question about why it wasn't okay to write about other boards here. But you seem to have missed that, both the fact the question was asked, and that I was replying to him.
Click to expand...

That was in no way obvious, Levi. Might I suggest using the "quote reply" button in the future?

Additionally, as I mentioned, the faq doesn't prohibit discussions about other boards and if it did, it would be a rule that should be ignored. The blurb mentioned in the faq really was put there to prevent haranguing over Parker, and/or, more broadly, to prevent personal gripes and trivial beefs about other boards from becoming a major disruption here. As that certainly wasn't the case in this instance, there was no need for you, or anyone else for that matter, to respond in a manner that came off as both preachy and law enforcement.

That said, my original question has been answered, so let's move along.
 
originally posted by Florida Jim:
When you come to a fork in the road, take it.
-Yogi Berra
Click to expand...
A_fork_in_the_road.jpg
 
originally posted by Brad Kane:
This board, by way of Wine Therapy, owes its existence to the WLDG by way of Robin Garr's actions over there eleven years ago. Many of us here left as a result, haven't looked back and have had zero interaction with that board in years ...

Perhaps if you understood the history of this place and realized the intro was really about RP, aside from the fact that what's mentioned in the faq deals with griping/complaining about somewhere else, not general discussions, you wouldn't blather about trying to enforce rules that you had nothing to do with. It really isn't your place, Levi.
Click to expand...

Wow.

Brad Kane invented Wine Disorder and is the arbiter of its uses.

I am so glad he is back from Wine Berserkers to set everyone straight. And to add that spicy twelve-year-old's logic we see here. It's my fort! I was here first!

Last time you participated, weren't you complaining about the cliquishness and exclusionary attitude you found rampant in these parts?

Your discourse would be laughable, if it weren't so distasteful.
 
originally posted by Sharon Bowman:
originally posted by Brad Kane:
This board, by way of Wine Therapy, owes its existence to the WLDG by way of Robin Garr's actions over there eleven years ago. Many of us here left as a result, haven't looked back and have had zero interaction with that board in years ...

Perhaps if you understood the history of this place and realized the intro was really about RP, aside from the fact that what's mentioned in the faq deals with griping/complaining about somewhere else, not general discussions, you wouldn't blather about trying to enforce rules that you had nothing to do with. It really isn't your place, Levi.
Click to expand...

Wow.

Brad Kane invented Wine Disorder and is the arbiter of its uses.

I am so glad he is back from Wine Berserkers to set everyone straight. And to add that spicy twelve-year-old's logic we see here. It's my fort! I was here first!

Last time you participated, weren't you complaining about the cliquishness and exclusionary attitude you found rampant in these parts?

Your discourse would be laughable, if it weren't so distasteful.
Click to expand...

Wow, look who woke up all persnickity! Methinks you're still weepy that I won't refriend you on facebook.

Talk about a laughable and clueless post! You're winning, Sharon!
 
originally posted by Brad Kane:
Wow, look who woke up all persnickity! Methinks you're still weepy that I won't refriend you on facebook.

Talk about a laughable and clueless post! You're winning, Sharon!
Click to expand...

Where did that come from?

Glad those things matter to you.

We were talking about your bullying and incoherent comments on Wine Disorder, not some idea of "winning" or social networking choices.

I had, though, forgotten that you're made of Teflon and no amount of reason sticks.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top