Was there a WLDG note purge?

[Lou Kessler]

Never have so many said so much about so little. Shakespeare or was it Coad?

 

[Oswaldo Costa]

This thread should be encased in a concrete tomb.

 

[lars makie]

originally posted by Oswaldo Costa:
This thread should be encased in a concrete tomb.

If it disappears, I think I'll know where to go ask about it.

 

[Kay Bixler]

Hey, lets keep on track. The argument is wether or not wine disorder is the right place to ask questions about the search function of the WLDG.

We've still got a ways to go before it's officially settled.

 

[Rahsaan]

originally posted by Lou Kessler:
observationNever have so many said so much about so little.

Oh, I think there is plenty of competition for that prize.

 

[Jonathan Loesberg]

originally posted by Kay Bixler:
Hey, lets keep on track. The argument is wether or not wine disorder is the right place to ask questions about the search function of the WLDG.

We've still got a ways to go before it's officially settled.

Kay's right. Taken as a matter of a pure philosophical puzzle, this could be an interesting question. Of course, to answer it properly, we would have to know what kind of place wine disorder is, what its essence or its purpose is. With proper conclusions to that question, we could surmise whether it is A right place to ask about the search function on WLDG. This would not of course show that it was THE right place. To show that, we would have to have some basis for concluding that not only WLDG but also any other possible internet site (as an arbitrary narrowing of categories) was not also A right place. Of course, perhaps concluding that wine disorder is A right place would be sufficient. But that is another question yet.

I think there is serious intellectual work to do here. Let's get started people.

 

[Cliff]

No, no, no! That will make my head hurt. We need a multiple-choice test.

 

[lars makie]

originally posted by Cliff:
No, no, no! That will make my head hurt. We need a multiple-choice test.

It just hit me! We need one of those poll thingys.

 

[Jeff Grossman]

originally posted by lars makie:
It just hit me! We need one of those poll thingys.

Hit it back. Then grab a coffee and let's get cracking.

 

[maureen]

wow, I was in St Joseph, Mo, for three days, away from TV and internet - so glad this was the first wine board thread I opened.

thanks for the humor, professor.

 

[David M. Bueker]

I rest my case.

 

[Lou Kessler]

originally posted by Jonathan Loesberg:

originally posted by Kay Bixler:
Hey, lets keep on track. The argument is wether or not wine disorder is the right place to ask questions about the search function of the WLDG.

We've still got a ways to go before it's officially settled.

Kay's right. Taken as a matter of a pure philosophical puzzle, this could be an interesting question. Of course, to answer it properly, we would have to know what kind of place wine disorder is, what its essence or its purpose is. With proper conclusions to that question, we could surmise whether it is A right place to ask about the search function on WLDG. This would not of course show that it was THE right place. To show that, we would have to have some basis for concluding that not only WLDG but also any other possible internet site (as an arbitrary narrowing of categories) was not also A right place. Of course, perhaps concluding that wine disorder is A right place would be sufficient. But that is another question yet.

I think there is serious intellectual work to do here. Let's get started people.

I'm sure there will be many more profound observations in regards to this thread. Jonathan do you think if all the writings were assembed & collated this work might qualify for an addition to The Great Books series? Sf Joe and other participants on this board know Patchen a wine geek who is a prof at the University of Chicago and this might give us an opportunity to make the big time.

 

[Ian Fitzsimmons]

I nominate Jonathan for party secretary.

 

[Steve Guattery]

originally posted by Ian Fitzsimmons:
I nominate Jonathan for party secretary.

How fast can he type?

 

[Kay Bixler]

originally posted by Jonathan Loesberg:

originally posted by Kay Bixler:
Hey, lets keep on track. The argument is wether or not wine disorder is the right place to ask questions about the search function of the WLDG.

We've still got a ways to go before it's officially settled.

Kay's right. Taken as a matter of a pure philosophical puzzle, this could be an interesting question. Of course, to answer it properly, we would have to know what kind of place wine disorder is, what its essence or its purpose is. With proper conclusions to that question, we could surmise whether it is A right place to ask about the search function on WLDG. This would not of course show that it was THE right place. To show that, we would have to have some basis for concluding that not only WLDG but also any other possible internet site (as an arbitrary narrowing of categories) was not also A right place. Of course, perhaps concluding that wine disorder is A right place would be sufficient. But that is another question yet.

I think there is serious intellectual work to do here. Let's get started people.

Agree on all issues Jonathan. There are a lot of unanswered questions.

Honestly if someone had asked me two days ago if Wine Disorder were the right place to ask about the search function of the WLDG I would have said no, absolutely not, go to the WLDG for that. But now that Brad has asked the question here and received the correct answer my world view has changed. Dramatically. Now I feel there may not be any query boundaries on the Internet at all. Could one go to Wikipidia and ask about Google? Probably, I just don't know anymore.

 

[David M. Bueker]

If you Google Wikipedia you will open a rift in the space-time continuum, thereby destroying the universe. Or maybe you will destroy Will Smith. I can never quite remember.

 

[Yule Kim]

originally posted by David M. Bueker:
If you Google Wikipedia you will open a rift in the space-time continuum, thereby destroying the universe. Or maybe you will destroy Will Smith. I can never quite remember.

Nope.

You just get this:

Loading…

www.google.com

 

[Oswaldo Costa]

The level of toxic radioactivity has escalated to a point where even concrete will prove insufficient. Where is that poll thingie?

 

[Jeff Grossman]

The poll thingies are busy praying for Bueker. Ask again later.

 

[Levi Dalton]

originally posted by Jonathan Loesberg:

originally posted by Kay Bixler:
Hey, lets keep on track. The argument is wether or not wine disorder is the right place to ask questions about the search function of the WLDG.

We've still got a ways to go before it's officially settled.

Kay's right. Taken as a matter of a pure philosophical puzzle, this could be an interesting question. Of course, to answer it properly, we would have to know what kind of place wine disorder is, what its essence or its purpose is. With proper conclusions to that question, we could surmise whether it is A right place to ask about the search function on WLDG. This would not of course show that it was THE right place. To show that, we would have to have some basis for concluding that not only WLDG but also any other possible internet site (as an arbitrary narrowing of categories) was not also A right place. Of course, perhaps concluding that wine disorder is A right place would be sufficient. But that is another question yet.

I think there is serious intellectual work to do here. Let's get started people.

Honestly, this is hilarious.