Westcoast tastes

Florida Jim

Florida Jim
A week in CA and a few wines tasted; here are some impressions:

1998 G. Conterno, Barolo:
A beautiful wine with layer after layer of scent and flavor; still quite young but not too tannic to drink. Years to go and a fine future ahead.

2002 Peter Michael, Les Pavots:
A Bordeaux blend that was completely open, well-balanced with clear, moderately complex fruit and a good finish. At or near peak and very nice with steak.

1995 Pride, Claret:
Also a Bordeaux blend; much too sweet and oaky to be enjoyable (for me); this is not my style.

2010 Bevan Cellars, Sauvignon Blanc Monica’s Cuvée:
Another exceptional effort from this producer, perhaps even better than the 2009 and alcohol of less than 13%. No grass or cat pee but rather lovely citrus and papaya/mango flavors with excellent cut.

2010 Argot, Rosé (375 ml):
Some RS and considerable acidity, good fruit and a nice color. I like it best at or near room temp. and the idea of rosé in 275 I find rather appealing.

2009 Porter-Bass, Pinot Noir:
Very nice wine and certainly more in the Pommard style than the Dijon style. Rich and vibrant.

Three just bottled wines:

2009 Ceritas, Pinot Noir Escarpa Vineyard:
Under 14% alcohol; about as impressive a new pinot as I have tasted. A Sonoma Coast vineyard that really shows the maritime influence and is sort of wild and feral while at the same time being well-balanced and deep. This will take a decade to be ready but everything is there to make it a potential Grand Cru. John Raytek, former assistant at Copain, is owner and winemaker. Really impressive, albeit pricey at $55/bottle.

2009 Ceritas, Chardonnay Ritchie Vnyd.:
Another under 14% wine, this is quite acidic, sulpherous and closed at the moment; More like a Chablis then a CA chard. Judgment reserved.

2009 Ceritas, Chardonnay Porter-Bass:
Under 14% and shows the signature of the vineyard even while being somewhat closed and sulpherous. I suspect this will be ready sooner but will still last longer then most CA chards.

A few others:

2005 Pepière, Granite de Clisson:
Magnificent no other way to put it. Crystalline but deep, bright but full, complex but complete; a great wine that may last decades but tastes wonderful now.

2006 Overnoy/Houillon, Arbois-Pupillin:
Utterly charming; most any other wine on the table is just not as interesting and so, despite its pale color, all else pales. Poulsard at its most complex and ethereal.

1995 Edmunds St. John, Syrah Durrell Vineyard:
When first opened, quite thin and dominated with spearmint/menthol aromas; in the decanter over several hours the texture broadened and thickened, and the aromas included smoked bacon, meat, dark fruit and earth. The menthol aspect never went away and, frankly, I did not like it, but the wine is still sound and good. I have other bottles so I will see if this is a single bottle phenomenon or a general characteristic of the wine in the coming weeks.

I tasted a number of other cabs. and pinots from CA and some other wines that really didn’t make enough impression to write about.

Keep an eye on Ceritas; these are really different from the mainstream and show a lot of potential.

Best, Jim
 
originally posted by Florida Jim: Westcoast tastes2002 Peter Michael, Les Pavots:A Bordeaux blend that was completely open, well-balanced with clear, moderately complex fruit and a good finish. At or near peak and very nice with steak.

Jim, Thanks!

I just bought some of this bottling in the 2007 vintage for a group I'm with. Any thoughts on the 2007?

. . . . . . Pete
 
originally posted by Florida Jim:
Westcoast tastesA week in CA and a few wines tasted; here are some impressions:

2005 Pepière, Granite de Clisson:
Magnificent no other way to put it. Crystalline but deep, bright but full, complex but complete; a great wine that may last decades but tastes wonderful now.

I just opened a bottle of this last Sunday. Your note pretty much sums it up. Even Mr. Cartwright (hater of aged Muscadet) really liked this. I'm not so sure I'll let my remaining bottles age as long as you suggest. Perhaps one as a science experiment.
 
originally posted by Peter Creasey:
originally posted by Florida Jim: Westcoast tastes2002 Peter Michael, Les Pavots:A Bordeaux blend that was completely open, well-balanced with clear, moderately complex fruit and a good finish. At or near peak and very nice with steak.

Jim, Thanks!

I just bought some of this bottling in the 2007 vintage for a group I'm with. Any thoughts on the 2007?

. . . . . . Pete
Winemaker has changed since 2002 and I have not tried the 2007.
Best, Jim
 
I am having a hard time swallowing that note on Les Pavots 2002, but admittedly it has been years since I tried that vintage of that wine.
 
Levi,
Actually, I understand.
I have not been a fan of the house; not for any of their wines. And perhaps it was the comparison - The Pride against the PM.
But then, the Conterno was on the same table, so I guess that's not it.
Even a blind squirrel, I suppose . . .
Best, Jim
 
originally posted by Larry Stein:
originally posted by Florida Jim:
Westcoast tastesA week in CA and a few wines tasted; here are some impressions:

2005 Pepière, Granite de Clisson:
Magnificent no other way to put it. Crystalline but deep, bright but full, complex but complete; a great wine that may last decades but tastes wonderful now.

I just opened a bottle of this last Sunday. Your note pretty much sums it up. Even Mr. Cartwright (hater of aged Muscadet) really liked this. I'm not so sure I'll let my remaining bottles age as long as you suggest. Perhaps one as a science experiment.

thanks for reminding me to try a bottle soon.
I've heard everything from "as good as it will get, drink now" to "drink now or sometime over the next 15 years" on this one.

But a more interesting question is how this wine will behave with oysters. A bottle of 09 Pepiere last weekend provided for one of the greatest food/wine matches I am yet to encounter.
 
originally posted by Levi Dalton:
Also, we all knew Cory would see the aged muscadet light one day. He is too intelligent not to.

The reason he liked it is because it hadn't developed that cheesy note that many aged Muscadets acquire.

.sasha, I think it'll be fine with oysters.
 
originally posted by SFJoe:
You wouldn't really call 2005 "aged" at this point.

Especially not the Granite de Clisson, which is a prodigious wine. You gotta start people like Cory off gently, though, something I've learned from years of getting Jean past her aged white wine phobia.

Mark Lipton
 
originally posted by Florida Jim:
Levi,
Actually, I understand.
I have not been a fan of the house; not for any of their wines. And perhaps it was the comparison - The Pride against the PM.
But then, the Conterno was on the same table, so I guess that's not it.
Even a blind squirrel, I suppose . . .
Best, Jim

I do remember the 2002 Les Pavots being significantly less huge-a-fied than the 2001 Les Pavots, which is the one that got the significant press at the time. But I still remember a lot of purple-osity. Still, as I mention, it has been years.
 
Back
Top