'02 Huet Petillant question

originally posted by twaldmann:
originally posted by Ian Fitzsimmons:
originally posted by twaldmann:
Yes I have. I don't find an answer to the question of what the difference between the two non-reserve labels is. Hence, the post.

You didn't say anything, so who's to know?

Fwiw, I don't think I've ever seen the one w/o an H on it, text only.

Also, Jeff merits reasonable respect. People say 'fuck' here quite a lot.

So, telling me to "fuck off" is ok, but calling someone a fuckwad is not? Is is strictly a verb/noun thing? In that case, I guess an apology is in order.

I apologize for the behavior of my geriatric co-posters. I can solve this label mystery for you. I will arrange for the pickup of the bottles and upon closer inspection get back to you with some details. Let me know when I can pick them up.
 
originally posted by SFJoe:
64_pet.jpg

Will you still need me,
will you still feed me,
when I'm sixty-four?
 
originally posted by Jonathan Loesberg:
originally posted by twaldmann:
originally posted by Ian Fitzsimmons:
originally posted by twaldmann:
Yes I have. I don't find an answer to the question of what the difference between the two non-reserve labels is. Hence, the post.

You didn't say anything, so who's to know?

Fwiw, I don't think I've ever seen the one w/o an H on it, text only.

Also, Jeff merits reasonable respect. People say 'fuck' here quite a lot.

So, telling me to "fuck off" is ok, but calling someone a fuckwad is not? Is is strictly a verb/noun thing? In that case, I guess an apology is in order.

Yes, this is not in the FAQ's, but telling someone to fuck off in answer to a first post is the accepted way of welcoming warmly here. If no one had told you to fuck off, it would have amounted as dissing you. Your reponse, however, was manifestly impolite and out of order. Of course, that may have made it disorderly, in which case it was eponymous and doesn't require an apology. But that would be a matter of judging your intention. If indeed, you recognized the convention and meant to reply in kind, then you would both have failed as a matter of convention and yet have meant to have been in order. That I think would require two apologies. So you owe Jeff either no apology or two apologies, depending on how you construe what you said.

Oh, and just to add my welcome, fuck you.

Three apologies submitted, just in case. I'm still unclear on the verb/noun question though.
 
originally posted by Bryan Garcia:
originally posted by twaldmann:
originally posted by Ian Fitzsimmons:
originally posted by twaldmann:
Yes I have. I don't find an answer to the question of what the difference between the two non-reserve labels is. Hence, the post.

You didn't say anything, so who's to know?

Fwiw, I don't think I've ever seen the one w/o an H on it, text only.

Also, Jeff merits reasonable respect. People say 'fuck' here quite a lot.

So, telling me to "fuck off" is ok, but calling someone a fuckwad is not? Is is strictly a verb/noun thing? In that case, I guess an apology is in order.

I apologize for the behavior of my geriatric co-posters. I can solve this label mystery for you. I will arrange for the pickup of the bottles and upon closer inspection get back to you with some details. Let me know when I can pick them up.

Monday, 9:12 am.
 
originally posted by twaldmann:
originally posted by Jonathan Loesberg:
originally posted by twaldmann:
originally posted by Ian Fitzsimmons:
originally posted by twaldmann:
Yes I have. I don't find an answer to the question of what the difference between the two non-reserve labels is. Hence, the post.

You didn't say anything, so who's to know?

Fwiw, I don't think I've ever seen the one w/o an H on it, text only.

Also, Jeff merits reasonable respect. People say 'fuck' here quite a lot.

So, telling me to "fuck off" is ok, but calling someone a fuckwad is not? Is is strictly a verb/noun thing? In that case, I guess an apology is in order.

Yes, this is not in the FAQ's, but telling someone to fuck off in answer to a first post is the accepted way of welcoming warmly here. If no one had told you to fuck off, it would have amounted as dissing you. Your reponse, however, was manifestly impolite and out of order. Of course, that may have made it disorderly, in which case it was eponymous and doesn't require an apology. But that would be a matter of judging your intention. If indeed, you recognized the convention and meant to reply in kind, then you would both have failed as a matter of convention and yet have meant to have been in order. That I think would require two apologies. So you owe Jeff either no apology or two apologies, depending on how you construe what you said.

Oh, and just to add my welcome, fuck you.

Three apologies submitted, just in case. I'm still unclear on the verb/noun question though.
Being disorderly means never having to say you're sorry.
Best, Jim
 
After all, who could know that the tribal greeting involves expletives?

Wow, I'm being so nice.

"She's the nice one," they'll tell you.

ETA: If this does not provoke mirthful laughter, I will have to sharpen my smaller weaponry.
 
originally posted by Sharon Bowman:
After all, who could know that the tribal greeting involves expletives?

Wow, I'm being so nice.

"She's the nice one," they'll tell you.

ETA: If this does not provoke mirthful laughter, I will have to sharpen my smaller weaponry.

Shut up, woman!
 
I see your gambit, and being zen is costing me. Yep. No response. Being zen.

There was a flower that started to blossom on my neighbor's balcony.

Etc.
 
Back
Top