Michel's birthday dinner

Sharon Bowman

Sharon Bowman
Michel Abood has blown into Paris in a tempest of wine bottles, and festivities pursued their course with a dinner in honor of his birthday, chez Bowman, last night.

1996 Pierre Moncuit VV - Oh dear. I poured a little of this in my glass and smelled: deep, honeyed, nutty nose. On the palate, somewhat oxidized tasting. In the glass, the wine was dark yellow. With time it became a little more balanced, but I was shocked at how quickly this one had slipped away. I bought it a year and a few months ago, at which time it was heady stuff. Time to drink the rest. With people I don't like.

NV Ruinart Ros en magnum - The other side of the coin: this was big and young and tight. Deep pink color. There was a lot going on, raspberries and biscuits and bark. We came back to it at the end of the meal and it was even better, smoother and palate-pleasing.

1993 Niellon Chassagne-Montrachet 1er Cru "Champgains" - Eew. Michel is going to think I don't like him. This started out absolutely disgusting. Fat lemon dreck. In its favor, it was impossibly young-tasting; I would never have guessed it was 15 years old. Over time (we came back to it with the cheese course), it developed a spearmint thing that took over. It lost its angles and gained a more classic Cte d'Or nose, but, weird.

2000 Rousseau Ruchottes-Chambertin - no problem, here. Other than that everyone drank this down so quickly there was no time to linger with it. Lingering with it is what I would do, oh yes. This was pitch-perfect, with a soft Burgundy nose and earthy, cherry, ore, and other mixed fruit and natural phenomena going on.

1973 Caymus Cabernet Sauvignon - there was no question of opening another Burgundy after that tour de force, so we switched entirely to faraway lands and times. The cork on this was intact and only stained maybe a third of the way up. In the glass, it was slightly cloudy with a very dark body. The nose was appealing. On the palate, it seemed younger than it was, good Cabernet of yore balance, yet with the sweet overtone that marks older wines. That sweetness became a little intrusive, and it wasn't really a wine I would enjoy more than a glass of. There remains one glass, and I'm curious to see how it will have evolved, this evening.

NV Didier Tripoz Crmant de Bourgogne - Michel had a dark bag with this dark horse in it. He made me swear up and down I would not peek, and he never believed me when I called Crmant de Bourgogne after we had all deliberated for some time. Michel, I did not peek. This wine was hard to pinpoint at first. It had a lot of body and a bitter cut at the end. It was clearly not a Champagne, but what could it be? Not Chenin, no, maybe a Crmant du Jura. We knew Michel had just been all over France, so that was no help. In the end, once revealed, it was easier to cozy up to it; it overperforms for Crmant, so context is important.
 
Really interesting follow-up: the Caymus was headily delicious on first sip. (By the way, it's 12.5% alcohol.) Fine dark fruit and maybe a dash of tobacco. But then, the sweet finish became cloying again, quickly. So: perhaps the principle of some old-wine lovers' dinners - only a small glass per person.
 
Sharon:

I'm a know-nothing on Champagne, but I thought Mocuit had a pretty good rep, and even I've heard that the 96s are supposed to be about immortal. Might you have had a single bad bottle?

FWIW, we had the 2002 vintage a couple of months ago and it was great.
 
My experience has all been extremely positive, if somewhat limited.

I'm not sure I've had the Champgains, but the 1993s I've had were more in the classic, nervy mold.

I find Moncuit wines to be extremely variable and I don't consider them good candidates for the cellar. (If I were lame enough to cellar Champagne, that is.)
 
Well, it was great hanging out with Sharon, Arnaud and their two lovely friends to celebrate my birthday. I had been a bad boy in the morning, finding the Rousseau for (what I would consider) a steal, and the Ruinart was a very generous gift from some very generous friends.

-1996 Pierre Moncuit VV
Yes, there was a bit of oxydation, and the color had me worried, however the wine itself was quite lively and fresh, with just a hint of the oxydative notes Sharon feared so much (to my palate). I do think this Champagne is on its way down as a 1996 should not look like this, but to say it was ruined is a bit extreme. I think Sharon was being a bit too harsh on this wine as I liked it, as did the others, it disappeared rather rapidly.

-NV Ruinart Ros en magnum
Oof, wow. At first, really tight and dry, but with air this blossomed with really nice raspberries and strawberries and all sorts of other little red berries (luckily, no dingles in there). The biscuity character was really lovely, and this just kept getting better with time. We didn't finish the magnum, so I would love to hear Sharon's thoughts on the wine's performance the next night (unless she and Arnaud waited until we'd left to have some alone time with the bottle...).

-1993 Niellon Chassagne-Montrachet 1er Cru "Champgains"
Again, my notes differ quite a bit from Sharon's. I thought it was lemony at first too, but to me it just needed to open up. I left a glass in front of me, and by the end of the dinner this was just amazing, with lemony hazelnuts and a lovely, crystalline perfume wrapped in almond skins. Really really beautiful, I loved this wine. I did get the spearmint thing, but I'm a sucker for Ramonet's wines so it didn't bother me.

-2000 Rousseau Ruchottes-Chambertin
Well, here we agreed to agree. This was stunning. Amazing. Wow. Pure, heady, haunting beauty in a glass. I still get shivers thinking about this. I hung out with this glass too (by the end of the night I had about 4 glasses of wine in front of me and everyone else's were empty). Gorgeous. After writing this note I'm going out to grab 2 more.

-1973 Caymus Cabernet Sauvignon
Very nice, with some hints of VA and lots of soft cedar and nuts going on, but as it breathed some dark fruits came out of hiding and balanced things out quite nicely, with a dusty undertone that I sometimes get in older CA Cabs. THere was a sweetness to the palate that was nice and I think helped smooth things out, but this was one to drink fast as I doubted it would last long. Too bad they don't make like this anymore.

-NV Didier Tripoz Crmant de Bourgogne
I won't comment on this as I represent it in the US, but I did like it as it's completely different from any other Crmant I've ever had (no dosage added back). Then again, I freely admit I don't drink too many Crmants.

Merci beaucoup to Sharon and Arnaud and the lovely Angela and Ashlee for hosting me on my last few days in Paris and sharing my birthday with me. I haven't laughed like that in a long time, it's been a tough year personnally, so this was a real treat.

OK, enough of this teary-eyed crap,
Cheers!
 
originally posted by Michel Abood:
Merci beaucoup to Sharon and Arnaud and the lovely Angela and Ashlee for hosting me on my last few days in Paris and sharing my birthday with me. I haven't laughed like that in a long time, it's been a tough year personnally, so this was a real treat.

OK, enough of this teary-eyed crap,
Cheers!

I'm going to break out the Klingon pain sticks for your party on your return. You'll be a lot more teary-eyed then.
 
originally posted by Brad Kane:
originally posted by Michel Abood:
Merci beaucoup to Sharon and Arnaud and the lovely Angela and Ashlee for hosting me on my last few days in Paris and sharing my birthday with me. I haven't laughed like that in a long time, it's been a tough year personnally, so this was a real treat.

OK, enough of this teary-eyed crap,
Cheers!

I'm going to break out the Klingon pain sticks for your party on your return. You'll be a lot more teary-eyed then.

Who said I'm coming back?
 
originally posted by Michel Abood:
NV Ruinart Ros en magnum
I would love to hear Sharon's thoughts on the wine's performance the next night

It was gorgeous, still. Great balance, still flush with bubbles, perfectly heady and elegant.
 
So I was in touch with Mr. Panaoitis of Ruinart, and he commented on the oxydized 1996s as well as the Rose. This is reprinted with his permission:

I am glad this magnum was shared among friends. I love the format for a party.... For your information, this Ros NV is a 2005 base, fresh from the cellars (I don't think it has hit the market yet) so I am not surprised that it is still quite tight. Very intense in colour, more than usual I'd say but for some reason the colour didn't drop much during the prise de mousse, less than it normally does, so this explains that...
I am not so surprised myself by the oxidized 1996. This was maybe a great vintage, but not easy to make succesfully. I have seen many 96s (usually more PN based than CH based so it is still a bit of a surprise for a Moncuit) with hints of oxidation even when young. The reason is that 1996 was probably not completely ripe (on a physiological point of view) despite the high sugar levels. So some wines were more sensitive to oxidation. The very best 96 (CdG, DP, SWR, Krug, I hope Dom Ruinart... ) are way up there among the very best champagnes ever, and they will probably survive us, but there are quite a few wines that sort of died before they even developped. They remind me those 75s Bordeaux.... For this reason I think that 88, 90 or even 02 ar better vintages for Champagne overall....
Just my 2 cents ;-)

Well, there you have it, perhaps this explains the Moncuit's naughty behavior the other night. Merci, Frederic, for your input and permission.
Cheers!
 
Cool stuff. Great notes from both of you. I know there is a tendency to wish they'd make California Cabernet like the old '73s. The '73 Mayacamas I opened out of mag for some friends this summer blew away its BDX counterparts. That said, they really are making some fantastic wines out there right now, even if they don't always line up to some people's palates. I think you have to make the conceptual leap to acknowledging that grapes want to be ripe to really enjoy them though. Sweetness is the hallmark of California fruit, IMHO, irrespective of alcohol levels. We'll certanly find out in 10 or 20 years which side is right on that latter issue (i.e., can higher alcohol Cabernets age).

Oh, and Happy Birthday...old...man...
 
originally posted by Ben Sherwin:
We'll certanly find out in 10 or 20 years which side is right on that latter issue (i.e., can higher alcohol Cabernets age).
Don't think we'll have to wait quite that long. Even vintages like '94 are informative.
 
originally posted by Ben Sherwin:
Cool stuff. Great notes from both of you. I know there is a tendency to wish they'd make California Cabernet like the old '73s. The '73 Mayacamas I opened out of mag for some friends this summer blew away its BDX counterparts. That said, they really are making some fantastic wines out there right now, even if they don't always line up to some people's palates. I think you have to make the conceptual leap to acknowledging that grapes want to be ripe to really enjoy them though. Sweetness is the hallmark of California fruit, IMHO, irrespective of alcohol levels. We'll certanly find out in 10 or 20 years which side is right on that latter issue (i.e., can higher alcohol Cabernets age).

Oh, and Happy Birthday...old...man...

I don't think I've ever had a Cabernet from California as good as the '73 Mayacamas, from magnum especially.
 
Happy birthday Michel!

And you can find me on the '70s California bandwagon. Though really I've had numerous bottles from the '80s and even a few from the '90s I've liked very much. Just fewer and fewer producers making wine I like.

From what John has written Mayacamas is still making the same style of wine they made in the '70s, and it will take the same 20-30 years for it show as well.
 
Thanks Jay! You and I have shared quite a few nice old Cabs, care to pop some corks when I get back? Maybe in early December? I might have some leftover somewhere.

Steve, I've never had that wine, but I've had many others from the 1970s that I just love.

As for Ben, well, when I get back someone's getting a spanking. Seriously, though, a 1994 retrospective held a few years back was quite the eye-opener, many of the wines had dried out and were undrinkable. I believe this was where Brad Kane's famous and loud "Ewwww" accompanied by a scrunched-up face became the tasting note du jour.
Cheers!
 
originally posted by Michel Abood:
Thanks Jay! You and I have shared quite a few nice old Cabs, care to pop some corks when I get back? Maybe in early December? I might have some leftover somewhere.

I'd love to but not in early December. Unless you'd like to join one of my San Francisco jeebi? I'll be back on the 10th.
 
Back
Top