TN: Seattle Jeebus (July 21, 2011)

Jeff Grossman

Jeff Grossman
7/21/11 Seattle, WA (Eva restaurant)

attendees: Brad Liljequist & Mme L, Lee Short & Melissa, Jay Miller, Bruce Schneier, Marc Davis, Jim Diven, James Hondros ("Mr. Eva")

Bruce, Jay, and I are in Seattle on Feroukian business and the local/near-local Disorderlies have kindly arranged a jeebus. They settle on Eva, an artisanal slice of foodie heaven. Take a look at the menu and the wine list!

The crowd is a mix of old and new faces. Lee & Mel used to live in Minneapolis, which is Bruce's home and where I had a long work stint. Jim is a self-proclaimed newb but he keeps it in check pretty well. Brad asks whether Jay and I met through wine geekdom or D&D and we demonstrate the full force of our G&S roots.

Meanwhile, Marc and Brad are razzing James: not only do we bring our own glasses and wine but Lee passes around samples of his home-cured ham. At this rate, soon we'll just pay for the plates and silverware.

Speaking of the food, Bruce and I share the duck liver mousse and the cherry salad to start and then we grab the last two portions of the pork Stroganoff on house-made pappardella. The citrus dressing on the salad acts as an excellent foil to the rich and fatty mousse. The Stroganoff was luxurious and weighty enough for all the wine it was about to receive.

We did not intentionally organize the wine into flights but that was sorta how things ended up.

Fizz and whites went first:

Gimonnet 1996 Champagne "Fleurons" Brut 1er, Blanc de Blancs - lemon and stones, lots of zip, not at all leesy or creamy; the wine doesn't leap up and call attention to itself but it is persistent and restless; I like this

Dom Closel 1990 Savennieres "Cuvee Speciale" - corked

Chidaine 2002 Montlouis "Clos du Breuil" - unctuous, orange and wax and cooked peach, the acidity is subdued but still drinks well

Chidaine 2002 Vouvray "Le Bouchet" - sweeter, fresher, more green grape than peach; this bottle was cooler than the Montlouis and the acidity was firmer

Tribut 1996 Chablis 1er "Beauroy" - really funky when opened; let this sit a good long time; this is the Gimmonet with cream and without fizz; big strong wine, which is not a bad thing

Chandon de Briailles 2002 Pernand-Vergelesses Blanc "Iles des Vergelesses" - elegant, complex, James says there is a saline note that reminds him of fresh sashimi; this wine is outstanding with the duck liver mousse

Huet 2008 Vouvray Demi-Sec "Le Mont" - kick it up a notch: so much acid, so much sugar, dynamic balance and intensity; thoughtfully brought out to go with the duck liver mousse, it was, actually, too much wine for it, running roughshod over the meltingly delicate spread

A sherry moment:

Equipo Navazos La Bota de Fino #24 - who knows?

The Beaujolais and Thereabouts flight:

Jadot 1992 Beaujolais - BJ likes them old and here's proof; orange pith and charcoal and some vague raspberry aromas; the wine is faint and watery but not feeble (there is still some good zip here); I wouldn't serve this with a steak but OK with a piece of bread

Thevenet 2009 Regnie "Grain + Granite" - a whiff of schoolpaste to start but then gets really meaty, the nose is very ripe but it's still built like the Chrysler building in the mouth; definitely need more of this

Clos Roche Blanche 2001 "Cuvee Cot" - OMG, a cool, deep pool of elemental wine; darkest berry flavors like I would associate with a hot weather clime but no roastiness, no thickness, and harmonious acidity

Tete 2010 Beaujolais Villages - (I normally report wines in the order tasted but it makes more sense to describe this now even though we actually had it just before dessert), from the Ten Liters of Goodness (see pic); it's been open for 3 weeks so I might forgive a slight candied note; in fact, it's pretty clean and tasty

The Burgundy flight:

Fourrier 2008 Gevrey-Chambertin 1er "Cherbaudes" VV - good zing, good balance, very nice to drink even if I get a whiff of diacetyl in the nose (which Jay vigorously and repeatedly denies)

Roumier 1993 Chambolle-Musigny - I think something's wrong with this wine but there's much dissension about it

The Rhone flight:

Allemand 1998 Cornas "Chaillot" - meat (more blood but more mi-cuit than in the Regnie) and blackberries in the expected elegant-rather-than-rustic package; really another OMG wine but Jay thinks it's slightly closed

Jamet 2006 Cote-Rotie - this wine is accompanied by ever so much sniping about the good old days and barrel programs and shark-jumping; meanwhile, the wine is recognizably Cote-Rotie if a bit glossy and a bit low acid (though that last is a vintage hallmark); I'm happy to drink this

Wind Gap 2006 Syrah - presented in a brown paper bag as Myster Wine #1; if I didn't have two Old World exemplars right here I would have said this was Rhone: there was adequate acidity and earthy flavors not buried in jam; and yet it is slightly too simple: it has the right outline but it isn't filled-in properly; I blind-test a couple of people at the table and no one is mistaken

The Nebbiolo flight:

Cantalupo 2000 Ghemme "Collis Breclemae" - (other grapes are allowed but this is 100% nebbiolo); a third OMG wine: uncompromisingly dry, austere, middling tannic; it's true it doesn't have the high-wire tension or complexity of Barolo but like the Cuvee Cot it reminds me of the experience (but not the flavors!) inhaling deeply from a bag of freshly-ground coffee

Sella 1999 Lessona "Omaggio a Quintino" - warmer than the Ghemme, more red-fruited, maybe a whiff of wood (barrel? stems?); for me, more beautiful than thrilling

It's a school night so we don't open any of the other bottles ready to hand, even though there's Overnoy and Monprivato just a few feet away. Twenty seems like enough for now.

Except for one dessert wine:

Huet 1995 Vouvray "Cuvee Constance" - as with the other Huet wine tonight this is flavor and character and grace played fortissimo; the wine shows no hint of anything resembling decay or even maturity but 16 years has modulated the incisive acid edge just a wee bit

I really have to come to Seattle more often if you folks are going to pour like this.

Thank you, one and all, for a warm welcome and a great evening.

(And, Marc, thanks for the eggs!)
 
Brad sportin the beard!

Jeff. those are great notes, thanks. Looks like y'all had a good time (though hard to believe the Overnoy was left unattended to...someone saving it for September?)

Btw, Eva sounds great.
 
The last Omaggio I opened was a touch too oaky for me - But for the Jamet, I might suggest that only time will tell the true story. The glossiness may be just a phase. The 1998 went through a phase where I thought it was going to be not to my taste but it's delicious now. Some wines never shed the oak signature - e.g. Gaillard, Montez to name a couple - but others seem to change over time and end up in nice places. OTOH, I haven't tasted (or purchased) Jamet since the 2005 so maybe there was a major shift - who knows? I do know that the 2004 and 2005 didn't taste fundamentally different as young wines than the 1998 did.

Back to the Omaggio - maybe it's an evolution thing as well? That's what I'm hoping for my bottles.
 
Jamet underwent a huge shift at some point; I'm not sure when. There used to be dirt floors and old demi muids and now there's a spanking new building with lots of new barrels. The 98 (which I adore) is a great example of the old Jamet. I found this 06 to be completely depressing.

Jeff, awesome notes, it was most excellent to meet you guys. The D and D fest sound like a lot of fun, I do miss those days.

BTW, it occurs to me people may have been offended by the title to the other post, if in fact people do get offended on WD. I was actually listening to the DK's when I wrote that and that was the result.

Let us know next time you guys are in town and we'll have fun again.

And by the way Lee, you need to start marketing you ham online or something. It's great!
 
As calibration - Thierry Allemand also has a sparkling new building with a bunch of new barrels as of about 2000 or so. Note that I'm not implying that his wines have or have not changed - just pointing out that new, clean buildings are not necessarily the road to ruin.

On Jamet, my decision on the 2004/2005s will be reached in oh, around (2011-1998+2004=2017) yes, 2017 or so. You are welcome to any conclusion you wish but my view is that your conclusion may be a hasty one. I'll get back to you in 6-7 years.

On edit, I find it interesting that someone who will age Jadot Beaujolais 9 years will complain that a 4-year-old Cote Rotie is too slick. Not trying to be personal, just pointing out a bit of a contradiction in my view.
 
originally posted by mlawton:
As calibration - Thierry Allemand also has a sparkling new building with a bunch of new barrels as of about 2000 or so. Note that I'm not implying that his wines have or have not changed - just pointing out that new, clean buildings are not necessarily the road to ruin.
I think anyone would acknowledge that 2001 Reynard noticed the new barrels.
 
originally posted by SFJoe:
originally posted by mlawton:
As calibration - Thierry Allemand also has a sparkling new building with a bunch of new barrels as of about 2000 or so. Note that I'm not implying that his wines have or have not changed - just pointing out that new, clean buildings are not necessarily the road to ruin.
I think anyone would acknowledge that 2001 Reynard noticed the new barrels.

Again, not agreeing or disagreeing with what you say about the 2001 Reynard - but can you extrapolate that one wine and the appearance of his new facility into a trend?

Not to sound too much like the old fart, but the jury's still out on my 2001 Reynards too. I think the 2000 Reynard might be getting "good" in a few years, I've been tasting that one over time. I'm not going near any of the 2001s for a while - including the sans-soufre. I opened one of them by mistake, thinking it was the 2000. Yeah, that was a mistake.
 
originally posted by mlawton:
As calibration - Thierry Allemand also has a sparkling new building with a bunch of new barrels as of about 2000 or so. Note that I'm not implying that his wines have or have not changed - just pointing out that new, clean buildings are not necessarily the road to ruin.

His wines have gone downhill ever since you brought this to my attention.
 
originally posted by Zachary Ross:
originally posted by mlawton:
As calibration - Thierry Allemand also has a sparkling new building with a bunch of new barrels as of about 2000 or so. Note that I'm not implying that his wines have or have not changed - just pointing out that new, clean buildings are not necessarily the road to ruin.

His wines have gone downhill ever since you brought this to my attention.

See, this is why blind tasting is good!
 
originally posted by mlawton:
[C]an you extrapolate ... the appearance of his new facility into a trend?
Dressner would say yes.

I'm not sold on the concept that Jamet has sold out. The 2006 was nice at the MaV and at Eva.
 
We visited Jamet in 2000 and again in 2008. It was as if we had visited two completely different domaines. It wasn't just about the building, it was everything. Visit one was to a farmer making extremely traditional wine (dirt floors, ancient barrels, rascaly dog nipping at heels) and visit two was to a slick production (I believe taken over by sons) complete with American style landscaping, new barrels filling a hall, and a lot of pride over Parker points.

In my experience it's a rare wine with predominantly new oak that can get past it through aging.

The 92 Jadot was mostly a joke that I picked up off Winebid for $5. I figured it was the perfect setting for it! I actually was surprised it was drinkable and somewhat enjoyable.
 
originally posted by mlawton:
originally posted by SFJoe:
originally posted by mlawton:
As calibration - Thierry Allemand also has a sparkling new building with a bunch of new barrels as of about 2000 or so. Note that I'm not implying that his wines have or have not changed - just pointing out that new, clean buildings are not necessarily the road to ruin.
I think anyone would acknowledge that 2001 Reynard noticed the new barrels.

Again, not agreeing or disagreeing with what you say about the 2001 Reynard - but can you extrapolate that one wine and the appearance of his new facility into a trend?

Not to sound too much like the old fart, but the jury's still out on my 2001 Reynards too. I think the 2000 Reynard might be getting "good" in a few years, I've been tasting that one over time. I'm not going near any of the 2001s for a while - including the sans-soufre. I opened one of them by mistake, thinking it was the 2000. Yeah, that was a mistake.
No, I own 2001 Reynard and I have hopes for it. I think there was a bit of a one-time bolus of new wood, and it was the '01 that took it on the chin. I don't think he's turning over the cooperage every year or any such. More recent wines are less marked.
 
originally posted by BJ:
We visited Jamet in 2000 and again in 2008. It was as if we had visited two completely different domaines. It wasn't just about the building, it was everything. Visit one was to a farmer making extremely traditional wine (dirt floors, ancient barrels, rascaly dog nipping at heels) and visit two was to a slick production (I believe taken over by sons) complete with American style landscaping, new barrels filling a hall, and a lot of pride over Parker points.
I sympathize. If presented these three doors, I know which one has the goat and a year's supply of Rice-a-Roni: one, two, three.

That giggled said, my palate was not offended by the actual wine, as you were.
 
Speaking of Seattle my Art of Eating subscription paid for itself by bringing the cannele at Honore Artisan Bakery to my attention. IMO better than the ones at the late lamented Bouley Bakery. On the other hand their macarons were a bit to sweet. Great pain au chocolat.
 
originally posted by Jay Miller:
Speaking of Seattle my Art of Eating subscription paid for itself by bringing the cannele at Honore Artisan Bakery to my attention.
By the time I got to the box there was only a half-eaten one remaining. It was good but presumably was better when fresher and not previously mauled.
 
Back
Top