originally posted by Brad Kane:
originally posted by VLM:
originally posted by Brad Kane:
originally posted by Florida Jim:
originally posted by Brad Kane:
Neither bacon, nor blt's are a Southern invention, monkey boy.
We'uns will try to control our collective skepticism of you yankees when you make such statements.
Best, Jim
The Romans certainly had bacon and blt's have their roots in Victorian era tea sandwiches.
Have any citations? Sounds like pure unmitigated bullshit to me. The cured meats of roman times were more akin to salted pork AIUI, not bacon. You are going to have some facts to back that shit up because I don't think anyone here believes you.
This quote comes from foodtimeline.org.
"Hams and bacon were either dry-salted or barrelled in their own brine. The Romans recognized ham (perna) and shoulder bacon (petaso) as two separate meats, and different recipes for preparing them for the table. According to Apicius both were to be first boiled with dried figs, but ham could then be baked in a flour with paste, while bacon was to be browned and served with a wine and pepper sauce...Bacon fat or lard was in particular favour among the Anglo-Saxons who used it for cooking and also as a dressing for vegetables...[Medieval] Country folk ate their bacon with pease or bean pottage or with 'joutes'."
---Food and Drink in Britain: From the Stone Age to the 19th Century, C. Anne Wilson [Academy Chicago:Chicago] 1991 (p. 74, 77 & 88) "